The Effects of Genotype, Density and Irradiance on the Growth and Mortality of the Brown Seeweed serratus Germlings

  • Choi, Han-Gil (Faculty of Biological Science and Research Institute for Basic Science, Wonkwang University)
  • Published : 2003.06.01

Abstract

Effects of genotype, settlement density and irradiane on the growth, mortality and population structure of Fucus serratus germlings were examined in the laboratory. The growth of F. serratus germlings was influenced by genotype of parent plants, which is likely to occur by microclimatic differentiation of substrata. The growth of germlings were greater at lower densities than higher densities indicating that intraspecific competition between germlings occurred within three weeks. Also, the growth of F. serratus germlings was better at $120\mumol\;m^-2/s^-1$ than at $60\mumol\;m^-2/s^-1$. However, mortality of germlings was determined by settlement density rather than irradiance. In population structure, skewness was increased at low irradiance and high density indicating that population structure could be changed by intraspecific competition. Thus, it is concluded that genotypic differentiation of F. serratus germlings occurred in a microgeographic scale, and the experimental density and irradiance level affected the growth of germlings.

Keywords

References

  1. Ang PO, Jr, and DeWreede RE (1992) Density-dependence in a population of Fucus distichus. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 90: 169-181 https://doi.org/10.3354/meps090169
  2. Arrontes J (1993) The nature of the distributional boundary of Fucus serratus on the north shore of Spain. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 93: 183-193 https://doi.org/10.3354/meps093183
  3. Bendel RB, Higgins SS, Teberg JE, and Pyke DA (1989) Comparison of skewness coefficient, coefficient of variation, and Gini coefficient as in equality measures within populations. Oecologia 78: 394-400 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379115
  4. Bullock JM, Mortimer AM, and Begon M (1994) The effect of clipping interclonal competition in the grass Holcus lanatusa response surface analysis. J Ecol 82: 259-270 https://doi.org/10.2307/2261294
  5. Chapman ARO (1995) Functional ecology of fucoid algae: twenty-three years of progress. Phycologia 34: 1-32 https://doi.org/10.2216/i0031-8884-34-1-1.1
  6. Creed JC, Norton TA, and Harding SP (1996a) The development of size structure in a young Fucus serratus poplution. Eur J Phycol 31: 203-209 https://doi.org/10.1080/09670269600651391
  7. Creed JC, Norton TA, and Kain JM (1996b) Are neighbours harmful or helpful in Fucus vesiculosus populations? Mar Ecol Proq Ser 133: 191-201 https://doi.org/10.3354/meps133191
  8. Creed JC, Norton TA, and Kain JM (1997) Intraspecific competition in Fucus serratus germlings: The interaction of light, netrients and density. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 212: 211-223 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0981(96)02748-7
  9. Dawes CM, Bird K, and Hanisak MD (1988) Physiological responses of transplanted populations of Sargassum pteropleuron Grunow in Florida. Aquat Bot 31: 107-123 https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3770(88)90042-3
  10. De Silva MWRN and Burrows EM (1973). An experimental assessment of the status of the spices Enteromorpha intestinalis (L.) Link and Enteromorpha compressa (L.) Grev. J Mar Biol Ass UK 53: 895-904 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315400022554
  11. Deysher LE and Dean TA (1986) In situ recruitment of sporophytes of the giant kelp, Macrocystis pyrifera (L.) C.A. Agardh: effects of physical factors. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 103: 41-63 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(86)90131-0
  12. Dixon PM (1993) The bootstrap and jackknife: describing the precision of ecological indices, In: Scheiner SS and Surevitch J (eds), Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments. Chaoman and Hall, New York, pp. 290-318
  13. Ellstrand NC and Roose ML (1987) Patterns of genotypic diversity in clonal plant species, Am J Bot 74: 1371-1380 https://doi.org/10.2307/2444338
  14. Figueiredo MAdeO, Kain JM, and Norton TA (1996) Biotic interactions in the colonization of crustose coralline algae by epiphytes. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 199: 303-318 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(96)00018-4
  15. Innes DJ (1987) Genetic structure of asexually reproducing Enteromorpha linza (Ulvales: Chlorophyta) in Long Island Sound. Mar Biol 94: 456-467 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00428253
  16. Innes DJ (1988) Genetic differentiation in the intertidal zone in populations of the alga Enteromorpha linza (Ulvales: Chlorophyta). Mar Biol 97: 9-16 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00391240
  17. Innes DJ and Yarish D (1984) Genetic evidence for the occurrence of asexual reproduction in populations of Enteromorpha linza (L.) J. Ag. (Chlorophyta, Ulvales) from Long Island Sound. Phycologia 23: 311-320 https://doi.org/10.2216/i0031-8884-23-3-311.1
  18. Jenkins SR, Hawkins SJ, and Norton TA (1999b) Interaction between a fucoid canopy and limpet grazing in structuring a low shore intertidal community. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 233: 41-63 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0981(98)00128-2
  19. Kain (Jones) JM (1964) Aspects of the biology of Laminaria hyperborea Ⅲ. Survival and growth of gametophytes. J Mar Biol Ass UK 44: 415-433 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315400024929
  20. Kendrick GA (1994) Effects of propagule settlement density and adult canopy on survival of recruits of Sargassum spp. (Sargassaceae: Phaeophyta). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 103: 129-140 https://doi.org/10.3354/meps103129
  21. Kendrick GA and Walker DI (1991) Dispersal distance for propagules of Sargassum spinuligerum (Sargassaceae: Phaeophyta) measured directly by vital staining and venturi suction sampling. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 79: 133-138 https://doi.org/10.3354/meps079133
  22. Knight M and Parke M (1950) A biological study of Fucus vesiculosus L. and F. serratus L. J Mar Biol Ass UK 29: 439-514 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315400055454
  23. Law R and Watkinson AR (1987) Response surface analysis of two species competition: an experiment on Phleum arenarium and Vulpia fasciculata. J Ecol 75: 871-886 https://doi.org/10.2307/2260211
  24. Loveless MD and Hamrick JL (1984) Ecological determinants of genetic structure in plant populations. Ann Rev Ecol System 15: 65-95 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.15.110184.000433
  25. Sideman EJ and Mathieson AC (1983) Ecological and genecological distinctions of a high intertidal dwaf form of Fucus disticus (L.) Powell in New England. J Exp Mar. Biol Ecol 72: 171-188 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(83)90142-9
  26. Underwood AJ (1997) Experiments in Ecology: Their Logical Design and Interpretation Using Analysis of Variance. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge
  27. Vadas RL, Johnson S, and Norton TA (1992) Recruitment and mortality of early post-settlement stages of benthic algae. Br Phycol J 27: 331-351 https://doi.org/10.1080/00071619200650291
  28. Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical Analysis. 2nd Ed. Prentice-Hall, London.