Verification of the Theoretical Model for Analyzing Dynamic Behavior of the PIG from Actual Pigging

  • Published : 2003.09.01

Abstract

This paper deals with verification of the theoretical model for dynamic behavior of Pipeline Inspection Gauge (PIG) traveling through high pressure natural gas pipeline. The dynamic behavior of the PIG depends on the differential pressure across its body. This differential pressure is generated by injected gas flow behind the tail of the PIG and expelled gas flow in front of its nose. To analyze the dynamic behavior characteristics such as gas flow in pipeline, and the PIG position and velocity, not only the mathematical models are derived, but also the theoretical models must be certified by actual pigging experiment. But there is not any found results of research on the experimental certification for dynamic behavior of the PIG. The reason is why the fabrication of the PIG as well as, a field application are very difficult. In this research, the effectiveness of the introduced solution using the method of characteristics (MOC) was certified through field application. In-line inspection tool, 30" geometry PIG, was fabricated and actual pigging was carried out at the pipeline segment in Korea Gas Corporation (KOGAS) high pressure system, Incheon LT (LNG Terminal) -Namdong GS (Governor Station) line. Pigging is fulfilled successfully. Comparison of simulation results with experimental results show that the derived mathematical models and the proposed computational schemes are effective for predicting the position and velocity of the PIG with a given operational conditions of pipeline.

Keywords

References

  1. Azevedo, L. F. A., Braga, A. M. B., Nieckele, A. O., Naccache, M. F. and Gomes, M. G. F. M., 1996, 'Simple Hydrodynamic Models for the Prediction of Pig Motions in Pipelines,' Proceedings of the 1996 Offshore Technology Conference, TX., USA, pp.729-739
  2. Cordell, J. and Vanzant, H, J., 1999, All About Pigging, On-Stream Systems Limited and Hershel Vanzant & Associates
  3. Fox, J. A., 1977, Hydraulic Analysis of Unsteady Flow in Pipe Networks' John Wiley & Sons Pub.
  4. Hodge, B. K. and Koenig, K., 1995, Compressible Fluid Dynamics with Personal Computer Applications, Prentice-Hall, Inc., pp.435-488
  5. Kentfield, J. A. C., 1993, Nonsteady, One-Dimensional, Internal, Compressible Flows: Theory and Applications, Oxford University Press, pp.33-118
  6. Korea Gas Corporation, March 2000, The First Stage of Development of Intelligent PIG for Low Pressure Pipeline
  7. Lima, P. C. R., Petrobas, S. A. and Yeoung, H., 1999, 'Modeling of Pigging Operations,' Proceedings of SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, TX., USA, pp. 563-578
  8. Nguyen, T. T., Yoo, H. R., Rho, Y. W. and Kim, S. B., 2001, 'Modelling and Simulation for PIG Flow Control in Natural Gas Pipeline,' KSME International Journal, Vol. 15 No.8, pp.1165-1173 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03185096
  9. Out, J. M. M., 1993, 'On the Dynamics of Pig-Slug Tranis in Gas Pipeline,' OMAE, Vol. V, Pipeline Technology, ASME, pp. 395-403
  10. Price, G. R., McBrien, R. K., Rizopoulous, S. N. and Golshan, H., May 1999, 'Evaluating the Effective Friction Factor and Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient During Unsteady Pipeline Operation,' Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, ASME, Vol. 121, pp. 131-136 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2830078
  11. Sim, W. G. and Park, J. H., 1997, 'Transient Analysis for Compressible Fluid Flow in Transmission Line by the Method Of Characteristics,' KSME International Journal, Vol. 11. No.2, pp.173-185 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02944891
  12. Tannehill, J. C., Anderson, D. A. and Pletcher, R. H., 1997, Computational Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer, Taylor & Francis Pub.
  13. Tiratsoo, J. N. H., 1992, Pipeline Pigging Technology, 2nd ed., Gulf Pub.
  14. White, F. M., 1999, Fluid Mechanics, McGraw-Hill Pub.
  15. Wylie, E. B., Streeter, V. L. and Suo, L., 1993, Fluid Transients in Systems, Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  16. Zwillinger, D., 1996, Standard Mathematical Tables and Formulae, CRC Press, pp. 716-717