Journal of the Computational Structural Engineering Institute of Korea (한국전산구조공학회논문집)

Computational Structural Engineering Institute of Korea (한국전산구조공학회)
권호 표지

Comparison of Energy Demand in Multi-Story Buckling Restrained Braced Frame and Equivalent SDOF System

다층 비좌굴 가새골조와 등가 단자유도계의 에너지 요구량의 비교

  • 김진구 (성균관대학교 건축공학과) ;
  • 원영섭 (성균관대학교 건축공학과)
  • Published : 2003.06.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In equivalent static nonlinear analysis and in energy-based design, the structures are generally transformed into an equivalent SDOF system. In this study the seismic energy demands in multi story structures, such as three-, eight-, and twenty-story steel moment-resisting frames(MRF), buckling restrained braced frames(BRBF) and a damage tolerant braced frame(DTBF), are compared with those of equivalent single degree of freedom(ESDOF) systems. Sixty earthquake ground motions recorded In different soil conditions, which are soft rock, soft soil, and neat fault, were used to compute the input and hysteretic energy demands in model structures. In case the modal mass coefficient is less than 0.8, the effects of higher modes are considered in the process of converting into ESDOF According to the analysis results, the hysteretic and input energies obtained from 3 story and 8 story MRF and DTBF agreed well with the results from analysis of equivalent SDOF systems. However in the 20 story BRBF the results from ESDOF underestimated those obtained from the original structures.

비선형 정적해석 및 에너지를 이용한 설계방법에서는 구조물을 등가의 단자유도계로 치환하여 해석하는 것이 일반적이다. 본 연구에서는 지진하중에 의한 3층, 8층, 20층 철골 모멘트저항골조(MRF), 비좌굴 가새골조(BRBF)와 힌지접합 비좌굴 가새골조 (DTBF) 구조물의 에너지 요구량을 등가 단자유도계 시스템(ESDOF)의 에너지 요구량과 비교하여 등가단자유도계로 치환하는 방법의 타당성을 검토하였다 입력에너지와 이력에너지를 산정하기 위하여 연암 지반, 연약한 토사, 단층 근처의 지반에서 계측된 60개의 지진을 사용하였으며, 모드 질량계수가 0.8보다 작은 경우 ESDOF로 변환할 때 고차모드의 효과를 고려하였다. 연구결과에 따르면 3층과 8층 MRF와 DTBF에서의 이력에너지와 입력에너지는 ESDOF의 해석결과와 비교적 잘 일치하였다. 그러나 20층 BRBF에서는 ESDOF의 결과가 본 구조물의 결과를 과소평가하는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Chopra, A.K., and Goel, R.K., 'Direct displacement-based design:Use ofinelastic vs. elastic design spectra', Earthquake Spectra, Vol.17, No.1, 2001, pp.47-64 https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586166
  2. Priestley, M.J.N., and Kowalsky, M.J., 'Direct displacement-based seismicdesign of concrete buildings', Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, Vol.33, No.4, 2000, pp.421-444
  3. Housner, George, Limit design of structures to resist earthquakes, Proceedings of the First World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Berkeley, California, 1956
  4. Zahrah, T., and Hall, J., 'Earthquake energy absorption in SDOF structures', Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol.110, No.8, 1984, pp.1757-1772 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1984)110:8(1757)
  5. Uang, C.M., and Bertero, V.V., “Use of energy as a design criterion in earthquake-resistant design”, Report No. UCB/EERC-88/18, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California at Berkeley, 1988
  6. Chou, C.C., and Uang, C.M., 'Evaluation of site-specific energy demand for building structures', Seventh U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Boston, Massachusetts, 2002
  7. Somerville, P., Smith, H., Puriyamurthala, S., and Sun, J., 'Development of Ground Motion Time Histories for Phase 2 of the FEMA/SAC Steel Project', SAC Joint Venture, SAC/BD- 97/04, 1997
  8. Chopra, A.K., Dynamics of Structures, Prentice Hall, 1995
  9. Huang, Y.H., Wada, A., Sugihara, H., Narikawa, M., Takeuchi, T., and Iwata, M., Seismic performance of moment resistant steel frame with hysteretic damper, Proceedings of the Third International Conference STESSA, Montreal, Canada, 2000
  10. Yamaguchi, M., Yamada, S., Wada, A., Ogihara, M., Narikawa, M., Takeuchi, T., and Maeda, Y., Earthquake resistant performance of moment resistant steel frames with damper. Proceedings of the Third International Conference STESSA, Montreal, Canada, 2000
  11. Clark, P.W., Aiken, I.D., Tajirian, F.F., Kasai, K., Ko, E., and Kimura, I., Design procedures for buildings incorporating hysteretic damping devices, Int. Post-SmiRT Conf. Seminar on Seismic Isolation, Passive Energy Dissipation and Active Control of Vibrations of Structures, Cheju, South Korea, 1999
  12. ATC, 'Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings', ATC-40, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California, 1996
  13. Valles, R.E., Reinhorn, A.M., Kunnath, S.K., Li, C., and Madan, A., 'IDARC 2D version 4.0 : A computer program for the inelastic damage analysis of buildings', Technical Report NCEER -96-0010, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, State University of New York at Buffalo, 1996
  14. Mahin, S.A. and Lin, J., 'Inelastic response spectra for single degree of freedom systems', Dept. of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, 1983
  15. Tsai, K.C., and Li, J.W., 'DRAIN2D+, A general purpose computer program for static and dynamic analyses of inelastic 2D structures supplemented with a graphic processor', Report No. CEER/R86-07, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, 1997