한국 성인의 영양위험군 진단을 위한 식생활진단표의 개발과 타당성 검증에 관한 연구

Development and Validation of Mini Dietary Assessment Index for Koreans

  • 김화영 (이화여자대학교 식품영양학과) ;
  • 조미숙 (배화여자대학 식품영양과) ;
  • 이현숙 (한림대학교 생명과학부 식품영양전공)
  • 발행 : 2003.01.01

초록

Improving dietary patterns, na, in turn, improving nutritional status, is now viewed as a key to improve public health and to prevent chronic diseases. There has been a peat needs to assess diet quality to identify nutritional risk group, however, little research has been done on methods to assess overall diet quality. The purpose of this study was to develope a mini dietary assessment (MDA) index for evaluation of overall dietary quality. A 10-component system was devised based on dietary guidelines and food Tower for Koreans. The system contained 4 food elements of which use is encouraged, such as milk, meat, vegetables, fruits, and 3 food elements of which use is limited, such as fat, salt, or sugar. Also the included were elements on dietary regulation and variety. A subject is to check one of ‘always' 'generally'seldom', which has score of 5, 3, and 1, respectively, so the total possible index score is 50. This index is to use without dietary survey and is to use even by non-nutritionist. A sample of 432 healthy males and females in their 30's and 40's contributed diet intake data based on 24-hour recall for the validation of MDA. The mean MDA score was 31.34 of a possible 50 points. The main nutrients for each MDA component was correlated very well with the results of 24-hour recall. Also, very good correlation was found between healthy eating index (HEI) score and MDA score. However, some of MDA components were needed a modification of term or/and statement. So the Uh was revised and another effort for validation was made with new sample of 169 subjects and even better correlation was found. The revised MDA could be used with minor modification to assess diet quality and to screen nutritional status. (Korean J Nutrition 36(1): 83-92, 2003)

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Report on 1998 National Health and Nutrition Survey Korea Health Industry Development Institute
  2. Goal and strategy for Korea's national health promotion Byeon JW;Kim HR.
  3. Kor J Community Nutrition v.5 no.2S Relationship between the number of different food consumed and nutrient intakes Lee JW;Hyun WJ;Kwak CS;Kim CI;Lee HS.
  4. Kor J Community Nutrition v.5 no.3 Comparison of Priorities in Health Center Nutrition Service Needs between Provider and Consumer Chang KH;Kim YO.
  5. Ministry of Health & Welfare. Report The health eating index (HEI) and mini nutritional assessment (MNA) for nutrition and health promotion Kim WY;Jung JE;Cho MS;Lee HS.
  6. Eur J Clin Nutr v.48 no.1S Nutritional influences on linear growth: a general review Allen LH.
  7. Kor J Community Nutrition v.5 no.2S Analysis of methods on dietary quality assessment Oh SY.
  8. Kor J Community Nutrition v.5 no.3 Development of a simple screening test for identifying Korean elderly at risk of undernutrition Kim KN;Hyun TS;Lee JW.
  9. J Am Diet Assoc v.96 no.7 Dietary quality and dietary diversity in France: Implications for the French paradox Drewnowski A;Henderson SA;Shore AB;Fischler C;Preziosi P;Hercberg S. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8223(96)00185-X
  10. J Am Diet Assoc v.97 no.3 The dietary variety score: assessing diet quality in healthy young and older adults Drewnowski A;Henderson SA;Driscoll A;Rolls BJ. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8223(97)00070-9
  11. Food Nutr Bull v.13 no.2 Relationships among dietary quality, children's appetites, growth stunting, and efficiency of growth in poor populations Golden BE;Golden MHN.
  12. J Am Diet Assoc v.99 no.6 The diet quality index revised: a measurement instrument for populations Hains PS;Siega-Riz AM;Popkin BM. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8223(99)00168-6
  13. J Am Diet Assoc v.96 no.8 Indexes of overall dietary quality: a review Kant AK. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8223(96)00217-9
  14. J Am Diet Assoc v.95 no.10 The health eating index: design and application Kennedy ET;Ohls J;Carlson S;Fleming K. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8223(95)00300-2