대한가정학회지 (Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association)

  • 제41권10호
  • /
  • Pages.149-171
  • /
  • 2003
  • /
  • 1225-0937(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-2818(eISSN)
대한가정학회 (The Korean Home Economics Association)
권호 표지

가정과 교육과정 구성을 위한 가정과의 성격, 내용구조, 가정과교육을 통하여 갖추어야 할 소양에 대한 기초 연구(I): 델파이 조사연구

A Basic Study for The Development of secondary Home Economics Curriculum on Characteristics and Contents Structure of Home Economics, Literacy through Home Economics Education(I): A Delphi Study

  • 유태명 (경상대학교 가정교육과, 과학교육연구센터)
  • Yoo, Tae-Myung (Depart. of Home Economics Education, Science Education Research Center, Gyeongsang National University)
  • 발행 : 2003.10.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study was carried out as a basic fundamental research to propose a theoretical framework for Home Economics curriculum. This research employed the Delphi Method to reach a consensus with the experts in each related educational field of study for putting forth a newly proposed theoretical framework of a Home Economics curriculum. The finally proposed theoretical framework will definitely play a crucial role in establishing a standard framework for educational goals and curriculum content for Home Economics curriculum since it is put forth with a strong agreement from a high proportion of the expert groups. Results on the nature and characteristics of, structural framework of curriculum contents, and literacy through Home Economics were drawn from the 3-round Delphi survey: 1. Home economics has a liberal and practical-critical nature and it promotes enhancement of quality of life through a practical problem-solving process in maintaining family life. 2. The structural framework of the home economics curriculum contents is organized with three-dimensional components of content area (dimension 1), process area (dimension 2), focus of organizing content (dimension 3). 3. One's empowering capability through home economics education is proposed: inquiring knowledge and understanding phenomena for future society, solving practical problems in family life, developing higher order thinking skill, cultivating a positive attitude and a values system toward life.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 교육부(1999). 중학교 교육과정 해설(III)
  2. 교육인적자원부(2001). 초 중 고등학교 실과(기술 가정) 교육과정 기준(1946-1997)
  3. 김경미(1993). 우리나라의 가정학 본질 규명에 관련된 근본 개념들에 관한 분석적 연구. 이화여자대학교 석사학위 논문
  4. 류상희(1999). 가정과 교사들의 가정과 교육과정 관점에 대한 선호도와 관련 변수. 한국가정과교육학회지, 11(2), 1-11
  5. 소경희, 채선희, 정미경(2000). 교육과정 교육평가 국제비교 연구(II) -주요국의 학교 교육과정 교육평가 운영 실태 분석. 한국교육과정평가원
  6. 소경희, 이화진(2001). 지식기반사회에서의 학교 교육과정 구성을 위한 기초 연구(II). 한국교육과정평가원
  7. 윤지현(1998). 가정과교육의 목표 설정을 위한 기초로서의 생활의 개념에 대한 연구. 중앙대학교 박사학위논문
  8. 이수희(1999). 중등 가정과 교육과정 개발에 관한연구. 중앙대학교 박사학위논문
  9. 이윤미 외(2001). 주5일제 수업에 대한 국제적 동향. 한국교육개발원
  10. 이종성(2001). 델파이 방법. 교육과학사
  11. 이춘식(2002). 미래 기술과 교육목표와 교육기준의 방향. 2002년 한국기술과교육학회 학술대회 자료집
  12. 이춘식, 최유현, 유태명(2001). 실과(기술.가정) 교육 목표 및 내용체계 연구(I). 한국교육과정평가원
  13. 이춘식, 최유현, 유태명(2002). 실과(기술.가정) 교육목표 및 내용체계 연구(II). 한국교육과정평가원
  14. 장명욱(1993). 가정학원론. 교문사
  15. 조용진(2000). 가정교과의 자유교육적 성격. 중앙대학교 박사학위논문
  16. 허경철, 강창동, 소경희(2000). 지식기반사회에서의 학교 교육과정 구성을 위한 기초 연구(I). 한국교육과정평가원
  17. 石川實(1999). 일본에서의 가정과교육의 방향. 한국가정과교육학회 초청강연 자료집
  18. Baldwin, E. E.(1990). Home economics curriculum: Purpose, problems, possibilities. Illinois teacher of home economics, 34(2). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 415 983)
  19. Brown, M. M.(1978). A Conceptual Scheme and Decision-rules for the Selection and Organization of Home Economics Curriculum Content. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 179 757)
  20. Brown, M. M.(1980). What is Home Economics Education? (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 199 546)
  21. Brown, M. M.(1985). Philosophical Studies of Home Economics in the United States. Vol 1 & Vol. 2. Michigan State University
  22. Brown, M. M.(1986). Home Economics: A Practical or Technical Science? In Laster, J. E. & Dohner, R. E.(Ed). Vocational Home Economics Curriculum: State of the Field. Teacher Education section. AHEA
  23. Brown, M. M.(1993). Philosophical Studies of Home Economics: Basic Ideas by Which Home Economists Understand Themselves. Michigan State University
  24. Brown, M. M. & Paolucci, B.(1979). Home Economics: A Definition. AHEA
  25. California State Department of Education(1984) Essential Living Skills. Consumer and Homemaking Education Guide to Proficiencies and Performance Indicators for the Occupation of Homemaking. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 252 717)
  26. Curriculum Corporation(1996). Home Economics in Secondary Schools.
  27. East, M.(1980). Home Economics: Past, Present, and Future. Allyn and Bacon, Inc
  28. Home Economics Institute of Australia Inc.(1999). A Curriculum Framework for Home Economics in the Junior Secondary School
  29. Indiana State Department of Education(2000). Family and Consumer Science Education
  30. International Technology Education Association (1996). Technology for all Americans
  31. Kendall, J. S.(1997). Content knowledge. A compendium of standards and benchmarks for k-12 education. Second Edition.(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 414 303)
  32. MacGregor, & Goldsmith E. B.(1998) Expanding our understanding of quality of life, standard of living, and well-being. Journal of Family and Consumer Science. Summer
  33. Minnesota State Department of Education(1989). Minnesota plan for Family and Consumer Science Education: A planning guide
  34. NASAFACS(1998). Family and Consumer Science Education National Standards. The Author
  35. Qualification and Curriculum authority(1999). Design and Technology: The National Curriculum for England
  36. Schwab, J. J.(1970). The Practical: A Language for Curriculum. National Education Association
  37. Sizer, T.(1994). Horace's Hope. What works for the American high school. Boston: Houghton Mifflin
  38. Tyler, R. W.(1949). Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. University of Chicago Press
  39. Yoo, T. M.(1991). The need for a reconceptua1ization of a core curriculum in undergraduate home economics education: A the oretical-critical examination of major historical issues and practical concerns in the field. Ph. D Dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University
  40. Walker, D.(1971). The process of curriculum development: A naturalistic model. School Review, 80, 51-65 https://doi.org/10.1086/443014
  41. Wisconsin State Department of Education(1997). Wisconsin's Model Academic Standards for Family and Consumer Science Education
  42. AAFCS(2000). Strategic plan for 2000-2005. http:www.aafcs.org
  43. Ministry of Education, New Zealand(2003). National Curriculum, http:www.tki.org.nz
  44. Ontario Department of Education, Canada(2000). http:www.edu.gov.on.ca
  45. QCA, England(2000). National curriculum on line. http:www.nc.uk.net