Clinical study on success rate of microscrew implants for orthodontic anchorage

교정치료 고정원으로서 Microscrew implants의 성공률에 대한 임상적 연구

  • Park, Hyo-Sang (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Kyung-Pook National University)
  • 박효상 (경북대학교 치과대학 교정학교실)
  • Published : 2003.06.01

Abstract

To provide some guideline for microscrew implants, 73 patients that received a total of 180 mini- or microscrew implants were scrutinized. The overall success rate was $93.3\%$ (168 among 180 mini- or microscrew implants) and the mean period of utilization was 15.8 months. Microscrew implants in the UB group (maxillary buccal area) succeeded at a rate of $94.6\%$ (87 among 92), mini- or microscrew implants in the LB group (mandibular buccal area) succeeded $96.6\%$ of the time (56 out of 58), while microscrew implants in the UP group (maxillary palatal area) had a $100\%$ success rate (11 out of 11), and mini- or microscrew implants in the LR group (retromolar area) succeeded in $73.7\%$ of cases (14 among 19). This study might indicate that microscrew implants can be used successfully as orthodontic anchorage in daily orthodontic practice.

치아이동의 고정원으로 사용되고 있는 miniscrew and microscrew implants의 임상 적용의 유용성을 알아보고자 73명의 환자에 식립된 180개를 대상으로 성공율을 연구하였다. 1년 기간의 전반적인 성공율은 $93.3\%$(180개의 miniscrew and microscrew implants중 168개 성공)이었고, UB군(상악 헙측치조골)은 $96.6\%$(92개중 87개 성공), LB군(하악 혐측치조골)은 $96.6\%$(58개중 56개 성공), UP군(상악 구개측 치조골)은 11개중 11개가 모두 성공하여 $100\%$를 보였고, LR군(하악 후구치 부위)은 19개중 14개가 성공하여 $73.3\%$의 성공율을 보였다. 이 연구를 통하여 볼 때 miniscrew and microscrew implants는 교정치료의 고정원으로 성공적으로 사용될 수 있을 것으로 생각된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Creekmore TD, Eklund MK. The possibility of skeletal anchorage. J Clin Orthod 1983 : 17 : 266-9
  2. Kanomi R. Mini-implant for Orthodontic Anchorage, J Clin Orthod 1997: 31 : 763-7
  3. Costa A, Raffainal M, Melsen B. Miniscrews as Orthodontic Anchorage: a preliminary report. Int J Adult Orthod Orthogn Surg 1998 : 13 : 201-9
  4. Park HS. The skeletal cortical anchorage using titanium microscrew implants. Kor J Orthod 1999 : 29 : 699-706
  5. 오문영, 정규림, 권용대, 류동목, 이백수: 구강내 고정원으로서의 Miniscrew 이용 증례, 대치협지 2000: 38 : 18-21
  6. Park HS, Kim JB. The use of titanium microscrew implant as orthodontic anchorage. Keimyung Univ Med J 1999 : 18: 509-15
  7. Park HS. A new protocol of the sliding mechanics with microimplant anchorage(MIA). Kor J Orthod 2000: 30 : 677-85
  8. Park HS. The use of Micro-implant as orthodontic anchorage. Nare Pub. Co. Seoul 2001
  9. Park HS, Bae SM, Kyung HM, Sung JH. Micro-implant anchorage (MIA) for treatment skeletal class I bialveolar protrusion. J Clin Othod 2001 : 35 : 417-22
  10. Lee JS, Park HS, Kyung HM. The M.I.A.(Micro-implant Anchorage) of Lingual Treatment of a Skeletal Class II Malocclusion. J Clin Orthod 2001 : 35 : 643-7
  11. Bae, SM, Park HS, Kyung HM, Kwon OW, Sung JH. Clinical application of micro-implant anchorage. J Clin Orthod 2002 : 36 : 298-302
  12. Matthews LS, Hirsh C. Temperatures measured in human cortical bone when drilling. Bone Joint Surg Am 1972 : 54: 297-308
  13. Sharawy M, Misch Ce, Weller N, Tehemar S. Heat generation during implant drilling: the significance of motor speed. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002 : 60 : 1160-9
  14. Askary AS, Meffert RM, Griffin T. Why do dental implants fail? Part 1. Implant Dent 1999 : 8 : 173-85
  15. Misch CE. Contemporary implant dentistry. 2nd ed. Missouri Mosby Year-book Inc 1999