The Journal of Korea CHUNA Manual Medicine (대한추나의학회지)

Korean Society of Chuna manual Medicine for Spine and Nerves (척추신경추나의학회)
권호 표지

The Study Of Functional Disability Scales for Low Back Pain

요통의 기능 평가방법에 대한 고찰

  • Moon, Sang-Hyun (Dept. of Oriental Rehabilitation Medicine, College of Oriental Medicine, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Ryu, Han-Jin (Dept. of Oriental Rehabilitation Medicine, College of Oriental Medicine, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Lee, Jons-Soo (Dept. of Oriental Rehabilitation Medicine, College of Oriental Medicine, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Youn, You-Suk (Dept. of Oriental Rehabilitation Medicine, College of Oriental Medicine, Kyung Hee University)
  • 문상현 (경희대학교 한의과대학 한방재활의학과학교실) ;
  • 류한진 (경희대학교 한의과대학 한방재활의학과학교실) ;
  • 이종수 (경희대학교 한의과대학 한방재활의학과학교실) ;
  • 윤유석 (경희대학교 한의과대학 한방재활의학과학교실)
  • Published : 2003.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives : The object is to the difference among the funtional disability scale for low back pain and to use Methods : I researched the contents of funtional disability scale for low back pain Results & Conclusions : 1. The funtional disability scale for low back pain is specific-condition and general-health 2. A proposal of set core of funtional disability scale for low back pain is back specific function, generic health state, pain, work disability, satisfaction 3. Oswestry disability index or Rolland disability questionnaire. wase used for standard specific-condition scale and SF-36 was used for standard general-health scale 4. SF-36 is able to use the funtional disability scale for low back pain independence 5. In the future, scale for low back pain shulod be standardized in multiple dimension by computer

Keywords

References

  1. 대한 정형외과학회지 v.25 no.3 요통의 평가지수 김남현;이환모
  2. Spine Assessment ofseverity in low back disorder. Waddell,G.;Main,C.J.
  3. Spine v.23 Methodologic issues in low back painresearch in primary care. Bouter, L.M.;van Tulder ,M.W.;Koes, B.W.
  4. Clin Orthop v.244 Quantifying postoperative defict of physicalfunction following spinal surgery. Mayer,T.G.;Mooney ,V.;Gatchel, R.J.(et al.)
  5. spine Outcome measures for low back pain research. Deyo, R.A.;Battie, M.;Beurskens, M.;Bombardier C;Croft P;Koes, B.;Malmivaara, A.;Roland, M.;Von Koff, M.;Waddell, G.
  6. Spine v.25 The oswestryDisability Index. Fairbank, J.;Pynsent, P.
  7. Spine v.26 Responsiveness of generic and specific measuresof health outcome in low back pain. Garratt, A.M.;Moffett, J.K.;Farrin, A.J.
  8. Spine v.17 Assessing health-related qualityof life inpatients with sciatica. Patrick, D.L.;Deyo, R.A.;Atlas, S.J.(et al.)
  9. Spine v.22 Measurement properities of the RM-18: A modifiedversion of the Roland-Morris Disability Scale. Stratford, P.W.;Binely, J.M.
  10. Spine v.28 Rasch analysis ofthe Roland disability questionnaire. Andrew, M.;Garratt ,A.
  11. Spine Assessment of severityin low back disorder. Waddle, G.;Main ,C.J.
  12. Spine v.7 Assessment of the progress of the back pain patient. Million, R.;Hall, W.;Haavick-Nilsen ,K.;Baker, R.D.;Jayson, MIV.
  13. Spine v.27 Using the Dallas pain questionnaire to classify individuals with low back pain in working population. Ozguler ,A.;Gueguen, A.;Leclerc, A.(rt al.)
  14. Spine v.14 The development of the Dallas pain questionnire:An assessment of impact of spinal pain on behavior. Lawlis, GF.;Cuencas, R.;Selby , D.(et al.)
  15. Spine v.22 The effect of pedicle screw instrumentationof functional outcome and fusion rates in postolateral lumbar spinal fusion. Thomasen, K.;Christensen, F.B.;Eiskjaer, S.P.(et al.)
  16. Spine Measuring functional outcome in person with back pain: A Review of back-specific questionnaire. Kopec, J.A.
  17. Spine v.19 Developing a valid and reliable measure of health outcome for patient with low back pain. Ruta, D.;Garratt, A.;Wardlaw, D.(et al.)
  18. Spine v.20 The Quebec back pain disability scale: Measurement properties. Kopec, J.A.;Esdaile, J.M.;Abrahamowicz, M.;Abenhaim, L.;Wood-Dauphinee, S.;Lamping, D.(et al.)
  19. National Health Survey: SF-36 population Normas
  20. Med care v.34 A 12-item short form health survey. Ware, J.E.;Kosinski, M.;Keller, S.D.
  21. Med care v.36 SF-36 snmmary scores Are physical and mental health truly distinct?. Simon, G.E.;Revicki, D.;Grothaus, L.(et al.)
  22. Spine v.24 Responsiveness of common outcome measure for patients with low back pain. Taylor, S.J.;Tayler, A.E.;Foy, M.A.(et al.)
  23. Spine v.11 Comparative validity of the sickness impact profile and shorter scales for functional assessment in low back pain. Deyo, R.
  24. Am J Ind Med. v.29 Measuring health in injured workers: a cross-sectional comparison of five generic health status instrument in workers with musculoskeletal injuries. Beaton, D.E.;Hogg-Johnson, S.A.
  25. v.16 Euroqol: A new facility for measurement of health related quality of life. Health police. EuroQol Group
  26. Acupunture in medicine. v.16 no.2 Measuring pain. Adrain, white.
  27. Spine Outcome measures for low back pain research: a proposal for stnadardized use. Deyo, R.A.;Battie, M.;Beurskens, A.J.(et al.)
  28. Spine v.22 cross-sectional study comparing Oswestry and Roland-Moris functional disability scales in two populations of patients with low bacl pain of differing levels of severity. Leclaire, R.;Blier, F.;Fortin, L.(et al.)
  29. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. v.22 no.3 A patient-specific approach for measuring functional status in low back pain. Beurskens, AJ.;de Vet, H.C.;Koke, A.J.;Lindeman, E.;van der Heijden, G.J.;Regtop, W.;Knipschild, PG.
  30. Spine v.17 Assessment of outcome in patients with low back pain. Greenough, C.G.;Fraser, S.D.
  31. J Clin Epidemiol. v.49 The Quebec back pain disability scale: conceptulization and development. Kopec, J.A.;Esdaile, J.M,;Abrahamowicz, M.(et al.)
  32. Spine v.26 Responsiveness of generic and specific measures of health outcome in low back. Garratt ,A.;Moffett, J.;Farrin, A.
  33. Spine v.24 Responsiveness of common outcome measure for patients with low back pain. Taylor, S. J.;Taykor, A. E.;Foy, M. A.(et al.)
  34. Med Care v.31 The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36.: Ⅱ. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Mchorney, C. A.;Ware, J. E.;Raczek, A. E.
  35. Spine v.20 The Quebec back pain disability scale: Measurement properties. Kopec, J. A.;Esdaile, J. M.;Abrahamowicz, M.;Abenhaim, L.;Wood-Dauphinee, S.;Lamping, D.(et al.)
  36. Spine v.26 Responsiveness of generic and specific measures of health outcome in low back. Garratt, A.;Moffett, J.;Farrin, A.
  37. Spine v.15 no.6 Is a condition-specific instrument for patients with low back pain/leg symptom really necessary? The responsiveness of the Oswestry disability index, MODEMS, and SF-36. Walsh, T. L.;Hanscom, B.;Lurie, J. D.;Weinstein, J. N.
  38. J Rheumatol. v.28 no.2 Minimal clinically important differnce. Low back pain: Outcome measure. Bombardier, C.;Hayden, J.;Beaton, D. E.
  39. Spine v.17 Assessing health-related qualityof life in patients with sciatica. Patrick, D. L.;Deyo, R. A.;Atlas, S. J.(et al.)
  40. Spine v.25 Ourcome assessment in the elevation of treatment of spinal disorder. Bombardier C.
  41. Spine v.27 Computerized questionnaires and quality of survey data. Hanscom, B.;Lurie, J. D.;Homa, K.;Weinstein, J. N.