산업공학 (IE interfaces)

  • 제15권1호
  • /
  • Pages.55-63
  • /
  • 2002
  • /
  • 1225-0996(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-6465(eISSN)
대한산업공학회 (Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers)
권호 표지

FIDO 방법론을 이용한 기업 간 연계 프로세스 모델링

Partnership Enterprise Modeling Using FIDO-Integrated Systems Modeling Technique

  • 김중인 (홍익대학교 경영정보학과) ;
  • 김철한 (대전대학교 컴퓨터정보통신공학부) ;
  • 이경휘 (대전대학교 컴퓨터정보통신공학부)
  • Kim, Joong-In (Department of MIS, Hongik University) ;
  • Kim, Cheol-Han (Division of Computer and communications engineering, Daejon University) ;
  • Lee, Kyung-Huy (Division of Computer and communications engineering, Daejon University)
  • 투고 : 20011000
  • 심사 : 20011100
  • 발행 : 2002.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This paper utilizes the FIDO methodology (Function, Information, Dynamic, Organization modeling) which is an enterprise modeling tool that can describe inter-organizational interaction (specifically between prime and sub contractors in this experiment). FIDO follows the standard IDEFO rules in order to demonstrate how a cascading information flow can evolve from a customer to a prime to a subcontractor in a concurrent manner, in a supply chain environment. Background on these processes is presented, followed with the newly derived process and methodology. This is presented in a supply chain management context, and results from an actual experiment at Motorola utilizing subcontractors that supply custom machine parts is presented and reviewed.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Coad, P. and Yourdon (1991), E., Object-Oriented Analysis, Prentice- Hall
  2. Davidow, W. and M. Malone (1995), L'Entreprise I' ge du Virtuel (French version), 286. MAXIMA, Paris
  3. Dillon, T. and Tan, P. L. (1993), Object-Oriented Conceptual Modeling, Prentice-Hall
  4. Jim Browne, Peter Sackett, Hans Wortmann(1994), Industrial requirements and associated research issues in the extended enterprise, IMSE '94 Proceedings, Grenoble, France, organized by INRIA, 9-16
  5. Messina, S. and Ms Carla Reyneri (1997), Exception Handling in CIMOSA: The MAGNETI MARELLI Application' 30th International Symposium on Automotive Technology & Automation, 109-117
  6. Pritsker, A. A. B. (1986), Introduction to Simulation and SLAM II, 3rd Ed., John Wiley
  7. Ross, D. 1. (1997), Structured Analysis (SA): A Language for Communication of Ideas, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE-3, 16-24
  8. Shunk, D. 1. and Wallace, C. P. (1995), Measuring the Impact of Agility the Establishment of Industry Demonstrations, Proceedings of the 4th Annual Conference on Agility I'orum Creating the Agile Organization: Modelr, Metric:s and Pilots, II, 236-244
  9. Shunk, D.1., Sullivan, B. and Cahill, J. (1986), Making the Most of IDEF Modeling The Triple Diagonal Concept, ClM Review, 12-17
  10. Sutcliffe, A. G. (1991), Object-Oriented Systems Development: Survey of Structured Methods , Information and Software Technology, 33(6), 433-442
  11. Wang, S. (1994), 00 Modeling of Business Processes: Object Oriented Systems Analysis, Information Systems Management, 36-43
  12. Weston, R. H., delaHostria, E., Kosanke, K. and Noxon, E.R. (1997), Business Benefits from Enterprise Integration, Workshop 5, Working Group 1., Proc. of ICEIMT '97 Int. Conf. on Enterprise Integration and Modeling Technology. Enterprise Engineering and Integration, ESPRIT Research Reports, Project 21.859, EI-IC, 1, Springer, ISBN 3-540-63402-9. 152-162
  13. Weston, R. H (1999), Reconfigurable, Component-Based Systems and the Role of Enterprise Engineering Concepts, Special Issue of Computers in Industry on CIMOSA. Ed.F. Vernadat and K. Kosanke. 40(2-3), November