A Study on Expert Testimony in Product Liability Litigations

제조물책임소송에서의 전문가 증언에 관한 연구

  • Kim, Sa-Kil (Department of Mechanical and Industrial System Engineering, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Byun, Seong-Nam (Department of Mechanical and Industrial System Engineering, Kyung Hee University)
  • 김사길 (경희대학교 기계.산업시스템 공학부) ;
  • 변승남 (경희대학교 기계.산업시스템 공학부)
  • Received : 20020500
  • Accepted : 20020500
  • Published : 2002.06.30

Abstract

The objective of this study is to provide guidelines for expert witness in product liability lawsuits. The expert testimony is one of the powerful methods to mitigate the burden of the proof in product liability litigations. However, it has been seldomly accepted as a reliable evidence by trial judges because the expert's testimony has sometimes turned out to be illogical and unreliable. In order for the expert testimony to be admittable in the court, the expert should have a thorough understanding of his/her role as an expert witness and follow scientific methodology whose soundness has been generally accepted by both industries and academy.

Keywords

References

  1. ALI (1997), The Restatement (Third) of Tort: Product Liability, American Law Institute Publishers
  2. BNA(2001), Expert Evidence Report, 2(01), ISSN 1536-190X
  3. BNA(2001), Product Safety& Liability Reporter, Inc., 29(42), ISSN 1522-5259
  4. Byun, S. N. and Lee, D. H.(1996), Product Liability and Safety policies for preparation of entry to DECO, Autumn Conference of Ergonomics Society of Korea,Session V., 141-151
  5. Byun, S. N. and Lee, D. H. (1997), Producer Liability Prevention with a implementation of ISO9000Series, Spring Conference of Korea Society for Quality Management, Session III, 185-195
  6. Byun, S.N. and Lee, D. H.(2000), Product Liability and a Product Safety Policy, Journal of the Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers, 26(3)
  7. Byun, S. N. and Lee, D. H. (1998), Implementation of Quality Management Policy and ISO9000Series under Product Liability Law, journal of the Korea Society for Quality Management, 26(1)
  8. Donald, J. Hirsch (1999), Challenging Unreliable Technical Experts After Kumho, For The defense, DRI
  9. Donald, R. R. Frederico, Robert A. Weiner (2000), Owning Daubert Challenging Expert Testimony as a Defense Strategy, For The Defense, November 2000, 12-48
  10. James, c.Ughetra, James P. Donovan (1999), Deposing Plaintiff's Expert, For The Defense, july 1999, 18-22
  11. J. Brook Lathram (1999), Assessing the Reliability of Expert Testimony, For The defense, July 1999, 12-51
  12. Lee, D.H. and Byun, S.N. (2000), A Systematic Approach to Accident Scenario Analysis of Child Nursery Equipment: Stroller Case Study, Proceedings of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 44th Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA, USA.
  13. Lee, D. H and Byun, S.N. (1998), A Systematic Approach to Accident Scenario Analysis for Safer Products: Quality Function Deployment Technique, Proceedings of the 6th Asia Pacific Quality Organization, Korea Standards Association, Seoul, Korea
  14. Lee, D. H. (2001),Development of a Product Safety Management System, Korea Standards Assaiaion
  15. Lee,J. W. and Kim,J. S.(1994), Legislation of a Product liability Law, Korea Legislation Research Institute
  16. Lim, S. H. (2000), A Study on the liability for Product Defects, Doctoral dissertation, Myong-Ji University
  17. Mark E.Gebauer (2001), The "What" and the "How" of Challenges to Expert Testimony under Rule 702,For The Defense, july 2001, 12-17
  18. Randall L. Goodden (2000), Product liability Prevention- A strategic Guide, ASQ Quality Press Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  19. Sam Brown (1991), The Product liability Handbook, Van Nostrand Reinhold, 447-479
  20. Walter J. Andrews (1999), Is Daubert Limited to Scientific Testimony?, For The Defense, February 1999, 4-8
  21. Willian R Sampson (1999), Daubert Challenges to Economic Experts, For The Defense, March 1999, 30-36
  22. Woo, S.B.(2001), A Study on the American Products liability Law, Master's thesis, Chungnam Nation University