Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

Korean Academy of Periodontology (대한치주과학회)
권호 표지

The Study of Implant Patient's Type and Implant Distribution

임플란트 환자의 유형 및 분포에 대한 연구

  • Hong, Sung-Jae (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Oral Science Research Center) ;
  • Paik, Jeong-Won (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Oral Science Research Center) ;
  • Kim, Chang-Sung (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Oral Science Research Center) ;
  • Choi, Seong-Ho (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Oral Science Research Center) ;
  • Lee, Keun-Woo (Department of Prosthodontics, Department of Prosthodontics, Yonsei University) ;
  • Chai, Jung-Kiu (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Oral Science Research Center) ;
  • Kim, Chong-Kwan (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Oral Science Research Center) ;
  • Cho, Kyoo-Sung (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Oral Science Research Center)
  • 홍성재 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 구강과학연구소) ;
  • 백정원 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 구강과학연구소) ;
  • 김창성 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 구강과학연구소) ;
  • 최성호 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 구강과학연구소) ;
  • 이근우 (연세대학교 치과대학 보철과학교실) ;
  • 채중규 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 구강과학연구소) ;
  • 김종관 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 구강과학연구소) ;
  • 조규성 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 구강과학연구소)
  • Published : 2002.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

It has been approximately 40 years since $Br{{\aa}}nemark$ first introduced osseo-integration for implants in the early 1960s. Unlike crown and bridge or denture treatment, implant treatment helps preserve existing bone and improve masticatory functions. Thus, the awareness of implant treatment has grown rapidly among dentists and patients alike in Korea, as it becomes a widely accepted treatment. The following results on patients type and implant distribution were compiled from 1814 implant cases of 640 patients treated at the periodontal dept. of Y University Hospital during 1992 to 2001. 1. There are no dissimilarities between men and women, with patients in their 40,50s accounting for 49% of patients and 56% of implant treatments; the largest share of patients and implant treatments. 2. Mn. posterior area accounted for 59% of implant treatments followed by Mx. posterior area(21%), Mx anterior area(l4%) and Mn anterior area 2%. 3. Partial edentulous patients treated by single crown and bridge-type prosthesis accounted for 98% and fully edentulous patient accounted for the remaining 2% 4. The major cause of tooth loss is periodontal disease, followed by dental caries, trauma and congenital missing. Compared to women, men are more likely to suffer from tooth loss due to periodontal disease. Also, older people are more likely to suffer from tooth loss due to periodontal disease rather than dental caries. 5. The distribution of bone quality for maxillae was 52% for type III, followed by 23% for type II, 20% for type IV and 0% for type I. As for mandible, the distribution was 52% for type II, followed by 37% for type III, 7% for type IV and 4% for type I. 6. The distribution of bone quantity for maxillae was 49% for type C, followed by 34% for type B, 14% for type D, 3% for type A, and 0% for type E. As for mandible, the distribution was 52% for type B, followed by 35% for type C, 6% for type D, 3% for type A and 0% for type E. 7. The majority of implants were those of 10-14mm in length (80%) and regular diameter in width (79%). The results provided us with basic data on patient type, implant distribution, bone condition, etc. We wish that our results coupled with other research data helps assist in the further study for better implant success/survival rates, etc.

Keywords

References

  1. Marcus S.E., Drury J.F., Brown L.S. : Tooth retention and tooth loss in the permanent dentition of adults: United States, 1988-1991. J. Dent. Res., 75: 684-695, Feb 1996 https://doi.org/10.1177/002203459607502S08
  2. 통계청. : 1999년 생명표. 2001년 8월
  3. Waerhaug J. : Periodontology and partial prosthesis. Int. Dent. J., 18(1): 101-107, 1968
  4. Carlsson G., Persson G. : Morphologic changes of the mandible after extraction and wearing dentures : A longitudinal clinical and x-ray cephalometric study covering 5 years, Odont, Revy, 18: 27-54, 1967
  5. Pietrokovski, J. : The bony residual ridge in man. J. Prosthet, Dent., 34: 456-462, 1975 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(75)90166-3
  6. Carr A., Laney W.R. : Maximum occlusal force levels in patients with osseointegrated oral implant prosthesis and patient with complete dentures. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Implants., 2: 101-110, 1987
  7. Wetherell J., Smales R. : Partial dentures failure: A long-term clinical survey. J. Dent. Res., 8: 333-340, 1980 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(80)90049-4
  8. Anjardn R. : Mayan dental wonders. Oral Implant., 9: 423, 1981
  9. Branernark P.I., Breine U., Adel R., Hansson B.O., Lindstrom J. & Olsson A. : Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prosthesis, I. Experimental studies. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery., 3: 81-100, 1969 https://doi.org/10.3109/02844316909036699
  10. Bruno C., Hugo D., Bruyn, : Comparison of Branernark fixture integration and short-term survival using one-stage or two-stage surgery in completely and partially edentulous mandibles Clin. Oral. Implants. Res., 9: 131-175, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02865004
  11. Buser D., Mericske-stem R : Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Clin, Oral. Implants. Res., 8: 161-172, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080302.x
  12. Lekholm U, : Survival of the Branemark implant in partially edentulous jaws: A 10 year prospective multicenter study. Int. J. Oral, Maxillofac. Implants., 14: 639-645, 1999
  13. Lindh T., Gunne J., Tillberg A., Molin M. : A meta-analysis of implants in partial edentulism. Clin, Oral. Implants. Res,, 9:80-90, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090203.x
  14. Ericsson I., Nilson H., Lindh T., Nilner K., Randow K. : Immediate functional loading of Branemark single tooth implants. An 18 months' clinical pilot follow-up study, Clin, Oral. Implants. Res" 11: 26-33, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011001026.x
  15. Henry P.H., Laney W.R., Jemt T. Osseointegrated implants for single tooth replacement, a prospective 5 years multicenter study. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants., 11: 450-455, 1996
  16. Schnitman et al : Ten-year results for Branemark implants immediately loaded with fixed prosthesis implant placement. Int, J. Oral. Maxillofac, Implants., 12: 495-503, 1997
  17. 한창식, 허남기, 김연미 최신 치과임플란트., 지성출판사. 2001
  18. Atwood D.A. : Postextraction changes in the adult mandible as illustrated by microradiographs of midsagital sections and serial cephalometric roentgenograms. J. Prosthet, Dent., 13: 810-824, 1963 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(63)90225-7
  19. Lekholm U., Zarb G. : Patient selection and preparation. In Branemark P.I., editor: Tissue integrated prostheses : Osseointegration in clinical dentistry, Chicago, Quintensence., 199-209, 1985
  20. Minsk L., Polson A., Weisgold A. : Outcome failures of endosseous implant from a clinical training center. Compendium., 17(9): 848-859, 1996
  21. Tallgren A. : The continuing reduction of the residual alveolar ridges in complete denture wearers. A mixed longitudinal study covering 25 years. J. Prosthet. Dent., 27: 120-132, 1972 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(72)90188-6
  22. Meskin L.H., Brown L.J, : Prevalence and patterns of tooth loss in the U.S. employed adult and senior populations. J. Dent. Educ, 52: 686-691, 1988
  23. U.S. department of Health and Human Services: Oral health of U,S. adults, national findings., NIH. PubI, No. (87): 28-68, 1987
  24. Watson M.T. : Implant dentistry: A 10-year retrospective report. Dental Products Report, 2632, Dec. 1996
  25. Friberd B., Jemt T., Lekholm U. : Early failures in 4,641 consecutively placed Branemark dental implants. A study from stage 1 surgery to the connections of complete prostheses. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Implants,, 6: 132-146, 1991
  26. Jaffin R.A., Berman C.L. : The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone : A 5-year analysis, J. Periodontol., 62(1): 2-4, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1991.62.1.2
  27. Pietrokovski J., Massier M. : Alveolar ridge resorption following tooth extraction. J. Prosthet. Dent., 17: 21-27, 1967 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(67)90046-7
  28. Pietrokovski J., Sorin S., Hirschfeld Z, : The residual ridge in partially edentulous patients. J. Prosthet. Dent., 36(2) 150-157, 1976 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(76)90136-0