T lymphocyte response to periodontal complex bacterial biofilm

치주복합세균성 바이오필름에 대한 T 임파구 반응

  • Choi, Jeom-IL (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Sung-Jo (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Su-Jin (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • 최점일 (부산대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 김성조 (부산대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 김수진 (부산대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실)
  • Published : 2002.03.30

Abstract

본 연구는 P. gingivalis biofilm을 쥐에 면역했을 경우 숙주의 면역체계중에서 T 임파구가 어떻게 반응하는가를 비교연구한 것으로 P. gingivalis biofilm은 단일 세균으로 구성된 것과, F. nucleatum과 복합된 것 공히 T 임파구가 유리하는 cytokine 중에서 IFN-gamma의 현저한 감소를 초래하는 것으로 판명되어, 향후 숙주 면역방어체계에 미치는 영향을 연구하는 중요한 지침자료를 제공해 주었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Costertone JW, Cook G, Lamont R. 1999. The community architecture of biofilms: Dynamic structures and mechanisms, p. 5-14. In Newman HN, Wilson M (ed.), Dental plaque revisited-Oral biofilms in health and disease, BioLine, Cardiff
  2. Kolenbrander PE, London J. 1993. Adhere today, here tomorrow: oral bacterial adherence. J Bacteriol 175: 3247-3252 https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.175.11.3247-3252.1993
  3. Marsh PD, Bradshaw DJ. 1999. Microbial community aspects of dental plaque, p. 237-254. In Newman HN, Wilson M (ed.), Dental plaque revisited-Oral biofilms in health and disease, BioLine, Cardiff
  4. Holt SC, Kesavalu L, Walker S, Genco CA. 1999. Virulence factors of Porphyromonas gingivalis. Periodontol 2000 20:168-238 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.1999.tb00162.x
  5. Ebersole JL, Taubman MA. 1994. The protective nature of host responses in periodontal diseases. Periodontol 2000 5:112-41 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.1994.tb00021.x
  6. Ebersole JL, Cappeli D, Holt SC. 2001. Periodontal diseases: to protect or not to protect is the question? Acta Odontol Scand. 59:161-6 https://doi.org/10.1080/000163501750266756
  7. Marsh PD, Bradshaw DJ, Watson DK, Allison C. 1997. Role of Fusobacterium nucleatum in anaerobe survival in microbial communities. J Dent Res 76: 226 (Abstr #1700)
  8. Bolstad A I, Jensen HB, Bakken V. 1996. Taxonomy, biology, and periodontal aspects of Fusobacterium nucleatum. Clin Microbiol Rev 9: 55-71
  9. Moore WE, Moore LV. 2000. The bacteria of periodontal diseases. Periodontol 2000 5: 66-77 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.1994.tb00019.x
  10. Kolenbrander PE, Andersen RN, Clemans DL, Whittaker CJ, Klier CM. 1999. Potential role of functionally similar coaggregation mediators in bacterial succession, p. 171-186. In Newman HN, Wilson M (ed.), Dental plaque revisited-Oral biofilms in health and disease, BioLine, Cardiff
  11. Feuille F, Ebersole JL, Kesavalu L, Steffen MJ, Holt SC. 1996. Mixed infection with Porphyromonas gingivalis and Fusobacterium nucleatum in a murine lesion model: potential effects on virulence. Infect Immun 64: 2094-2100
  12. Tew JG, Thomas SS, Ranney RR. 1987. Fusobacterium nucleatum-mediated immunomodulation of in vitro secondary antibody response to tetanus toxoid and Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans. J Periodont Res 22: 506-512 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.1987.tb02062.x
  13. Choi JI, Borrello MA, Smith E, Zauderer M. 2000. Polarization of Porphyromonas gingivalis-specific helper T cell subsets by prior immunization with Fusobacterium nucleatum. Oral Microbiol Immunol 15:181-187 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-302x.2000.150306.x
  14. Choi JI, Borrello MA, Smith E, Cutler CW, Sojar H, Zauderer M. 2001a. Prior exposure of mice to Fusobacterium nucleatum modulates host response to Porphyromonas gingivalis. Oral Microbiol Immunol 16:338-344 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-302X.2001.160604.x