Steel and Composite Structures

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Modelling of headed stud in steel-precast composite beams

  • El-Lobody, Ehab (School of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds) ;
  • Lam, Dennis (School of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds)
  • Received : 2002.09.17
  • Accepted : 2002.09.23
  • Published : 2002.10.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Use of composite steel construction with precast hollow core slabs is now popular in the UK, but the present knowledge in shear capacity of the headed shear studs for this type of composite construction is very limited. Currently, all the information is based on the results obtained from experimental push-off tests. A finite element model to simulate the behaviour of headed stud shear connection in composite beam with precast hollow core slabs is described. The model is based on finite element method and takes into account the linear and non-linear behaviour of all the materials. The model has been validated against the test results, for which the accuracy of the model used is demonstrated. Parametric studies showing the effect of the change in transverse gap size, transverse reinforcement diameter and in-situ concrete strength on the shear connection capacity are presented.

Keywords

References

  1. Davies, C. (1967), "Small-scale push-out tests on welded stud shear connectors", Concrete Journal, 1, 311-316, September.
  2. Davies, C. (1969), "Tests on half-scale steel-concrete composite beams with welded shear connectors", The Structural Engineer, 47(1), 20-40, January.
  3. Johnson, R.P. (1971), Composite Structures of Steel and Concrete Vol1, Beams, Slabs, Columns and Frames for Building, Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Publications.
  4. Menzies, J.B. (1971), "CP 117 and shear connectors in steel-concrete composite beams made with normaldensity or lightweight concrete", The Structural Engineer, 49(3), 137-153, March.
  5. Jayas, B.S. and Hosain, M.U. (1987), "Behaviour of headed studs in composite beams: push-out tests", Canadian J. Civ. Eng., 15, 240-253.
  6. Oehlers, D.J. (1989), "Splitting induced by shear connectors in composite beams", J. Struct. Eng., 115(2), 341-360, February. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1989)115:2(341)
  7. Li, A. and Krister, C. (1996), "Push-out tests on studs in high strength and normal strength concrete", J. Const. Steel Research, 36(1), 15-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/0143-974X(94)00036-H
  8. Lam, D., Elliott, K.S. and Nethercot, D.A. (1998), "Push-off tests on shear studs with hollow-cored floor slabs", The Struct. Eng., 76(9), 167-174.
  9. ABAQUS (2001), Users Manual, Ver. 6.2, Hibbitt, Karlson and Sorensen, Inc.
  10. Lam, D. (2000), "New test for shear connectors in composite construction", United Engineering Foundation Conference, Composite Construction in Steel and Concrete IV, Banff, Alberta, Canada. 404-141.
  11. CP117: (1965), "Part 1, Composite construction in structural steel and concrete", British Standards Institution, London.
  12. BS 8110: (1997), "Parts 1, Structural use of concrete: code of practice for design of simple and construction", British Standards Institution, London.
  13. Nip, T.F. and Lam, D., (2001), "Effect of end condition of hollow core slabs on longitudinal shear capacity of composite beams", The First International Conference on Steel & Composite Structures, Pusan, Korea. 1227-1236
  14. EC4: (1994), DD ENV 1994-1-1: Eurocode 4, "Design of composite steel and concrete structures. Part 1.1, general rules and rules for buildings", (with U.K National Application Document), British Standards Institution, London.

Cited by

  1. A simplified 2D model to study the contact–friction at the interfaces of steel–concrete composite beam-to-beam joint vol.84, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.11.023
  2. Moment resistance and rotation capacity of semi-rigid composite connections with precast hollowcore slabs vol.66, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.10.016
  3. Experimental and numerical analysis of the push-out test on shear studs in hollow core slabs vol.147, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.05.068
  4. Recent Advances in Design of Steel and Composite Beams with Web Openings vol.15, pp.9, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.15.9.1521
  5. A non-linear 3D FEM model to simulate timber–concrete joints vol.38, pp.8-9, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2006.08.024
  6. Numerical analysis of frictional contact effects in push-out tests vol.40, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.02.025
  7. Drilled standoff screws for shear connection in light composite steel–concrete trusses vol.63, pp.10, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2006.12.008
  8. Inelastic behaviors of steel shear tab connections vol.23, pp.12, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1095
  9. Cracking of a prefabricated steel truss-concrete composite beam with pre-embedded shear studs under hogging moment vol.21, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2016.21.5.981
  10. Behaviour of Headed Shear Stud in Composite Beams with Profiled Metal Decking vol.15, pp.9, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.15.9.1547
  11. Modelling semi-rigid composite joints with precast hollowcore slabs in hogging moment region vol.64, pp.12, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.01.012
  12. Finite element modeling and analysis of a hybrid steel–PSC beam connection vol.32, pp.9, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.04.029
  13. Semi-rigid composite connection with a partial depth end-plate vol.168, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1680/stbu.14.00039
  14. Experimental study on semi-rigid composite joints with steel beams and precast hollowcore slabs vol.62, pp.8, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2005.11.013
  15. Shear resistance of the perfobond-rib shear connector depending on concrete strength and rib arrangement vol.66, pp.10, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2010.04.008
  16. Experimental study on joint of spliced steel–PSC hybrid girder, Part I: Proposed parallel-perfobond-rib-type joint vol.33, pp.8, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.04.012
  17. Fatigue experiment of stud welded on steel plate for a new bridge deck system vol.7, pp.5, 2007, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2007.7.5.391
  18. Evaluation of the connection efficiency of hybrid steel–concrete girder using finite element approach vol.61, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2012.04.008
  19. Behavior of High-Strength Friction-Grip Bolted Shear Connectors in Sustainable Composite Beams vol.141, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001090
  20. Performance of shear connection in composite beams with profiled steel sheeting vol.62, pp.7, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2005.11.004
  21. Study of the Anchorage Connections for Buckling Restrained Braces Part 2: Theoretical Study vol.16, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.16.4.773
  22. Finite element modeling of push-out tests for large stud shear connectors vol.65, pp.10-11, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.06.010
  23. Determining the effective width of composite beams with precast hollowcore slabs vol.21, pp.3, 2005, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2005.21.3.295
  24. Flexural Behavior of Steel Reinforced Brick Beam Utilizing Interlocking Brick System vol.661, pp.1662-8985, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.661.116
  25. Flexural behaviour and capacity of composite panels of light gage steel and concrete vol.9, pp.5, 2002, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2009.9.5.397
  26. Numerical analysis of tilted angle shear connectors in steel-concrete composite systems vol.23, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2017.23.1.067
  27. Review of stud shear resistance prediction in steel-concrete composite beams vol.27, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2018.27.3.355
  28. Simulations of push-out tests: influence of several parameters and structural arrangements vol.172, pp.5, 2002, https://doi.org/10.1680/jstbu.17.00109
  29. Experimental study on steel-concrete composite beams with Uplift-restricted and slip-permitted screw-type (URSP-S) connectors vol.35, pp.2, 2002, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2020.35.2.261
  30. Behaviour and design of Grade 10.9 high-strength bolts under combined actions vol.35, pp.3, 2002, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2020.35.3.327
  31. A parametric study of steel-concrete composite beams with hollow core slabs and concrete topping vol.28, pp.None, 2002, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.08.045
  32. Assessment of web post buckling resistance in steel-concrete composite cellular beams vol.158, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2020.106969
  33. Parametric study of innovative bolted shear connectors using 3D finite element modelling vol.179, pp.None, 2002, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2021.106565
  34. Steel-Concrete Composite Beams with Precast Hollow-Core Slabs: A Sustainable Solution vol.13, pp.8, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084230
  35. Ultimate strength prediction of steel–concrete composite cellular beams with PCHCS vol.236, pp.None, 2002, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112082
  36. Analytical model for the Load-Slip behavior of headed stud shear connectors vol.252, pp.None, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113631