Steel and Composite Structures

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seismic performance evaluation for steel MRF: non linear dynamic and static analyses

  • Calderoni, B. (Department of Analysis and Structural Design, University of Naples) ;
  • Rinaldi, Z. (DiMSAT, University of Cassino)
  • Received : 2001.03.21
  • Accepted : 2002.03.28
  • Published : 2002.04.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The performance of steel MRF with rigid connections, proportioned by adopting different capacity design criteria, is evaluated in order to highlight the effectiveness of static non-linear procedure in predicting the structural seismic behavior. In the framework of the performance-based design, some considerations are made on the basis of the results obtained by both dynamic time histories and push-over analyses, particularly with reference to the damage level and the structure ability to withstand a strong earthquake.

Keywords

References

  1. Akbas, B. and Shen, J. (1998), "Energy-based earthquake resistant design methodology for steel moment resisting frames", Proc. 11th European Conf. Earthq. Eng., Paris, France, September.
  2. Bertero, V. (1997), "Codification, design and application - General Report", Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Behaviour of Steel Structures in Seismic Areas STESSA 97, Kyoto, Japan, August.
  3. Biddah, A. and Heidebrecht, A. C. (1998), "Seismic performance of moment-resisting steel frames structures designed for different levels of seismic hazard", Earthquake Spectra, 14(4), 597-625. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586018
  4. Calderoni, B., Ghersi, A. and Rinaldi, Z. (1995), "Influenza dei criteri di progetto sul comportamento dinamico dei telai in acciaio", (in italian), Proc. 7th Nat. Conf. L'ingegneria Sismica in Italia, Siena, Italy, September.
  5. Calderoni, B., Ghersi, A. and Rinaldi, Z. (1996). "Statistical analysis of seismic behavior of steel frames: influence of overstrength", J. Const. Steel Res., 39(2), 137-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(96)00037-5
  6. Calderoni, B., Ghersi, A. and Rinaldi, Z. (1997a), "Column ovestrength distribution as a parameter for improving the seismic behavior of moment resisting steel frames", Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Behaviour of Steel Structures in Seismic Areas STESSA 97, Kyoto, Japan, August.
  7. Calderoni, B., Ghersi, A. and Rinaldi, Z. (1997b), "Effective behaviour factor for moment resisting steel frames", Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Behaviour of Steel Structures in Seismic Areas STESSA 97, Kyoto, Japan, August.
  8. Chopra, A. K. and Goel, R.K. (1999), Capacity-Demand-Diagram Methods for Estimating Seismic Deformation of Inelastic Structures: SDF Systems, Report no. PEER 1999/02, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, April.
  9. Eurocode 8 (1994), Design Provisions for Earthquake Resistance of Structures - ENV 1998, CEN, European Committee of Standardization.
  10. Fajfar, P. and Gaspersic, P. (1996), "The N2 method for the seismic damage analysis of RC buildings", Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 25, 31-46. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199601)25:1<31::AID-EQE534>3.0.CO;2-V
  11. Gilmore, A. T. (1998), "A parametric approach to performance-based numerical seismic design", Earthquake Spectra, 14(3), 501-520. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586012
  12. Ghobarah, A., Aly, N.M. and El-Attar, M. (1997), "Performance level criteria and evaluation", Proc. the Int. Workshop on Seismic Design Methodologies for the Next Generation of Codes, Bled, Slovenia, June.
  13. Gupta, A. and Krawinkler, H. (1998), "Quantitative performance assessment for steel moment frame structures under seismic loading", Proc. 11th European Conf. Earthq. Eng., Paris, France, September.
  14. Hamburger, R.O. (1997), "Defining performance objectives", Proceedings of the International Workshop on Seismic Design Methodologies for the Next Generation of Codes, Bled, Slovenia, June.
  15. Mandis, P.A. and Chandler, A. (1998), "Comparison of force and displacement based seismic assessments". Proc. 11th European Conf. Earthq. Eng., Paris, France, September.
  16. Mazzolani, F.M. and Piluso, V. (1995), "Failure mode and ductility control of seismic resistant MR-frames", Costruzioni Metalliche, Acai servizi srl., 2(3-4), 11-28.
  17. Priestley, M.J.N. (2000), "Performance-based seismic design", Proc. 12th World Conf. Earthq. Eng., Auckland, New Zealand, January.
  18. Prakash, V., Powell, G.H. and Campbell, S. (1993), DRAIN-2DX: base program description and user guide, Version 1.10, Technical Report UCB/SEMM-93/17, Department of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, November.
  19. Rinaldi, Z. (1997), Individuazione delle Caratteristiche Spettrali di Accelerogrammi Naturali Italiani e Selezione di Registrazioni Compatibili con gli Spettri di Normativa, CUEN, Napoli, June (in italian).
  20. SEAOC (1995), Vision 2000, A framework for Performance Based Design, Structural Engineering Association of California, Sacramento, USA.
  21. Tso, W.K. and Moghadam A.S. (1998) "Pushover procedure for seismic analysis of buildings", Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials, 1(3), 337-344. https://doi.org/10.1002/pse.2260010317

Cited by

  1. Effects of structural uncertainties on seismic performance of steel moment resisting frames vol.120, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.12.031
  2. Evaluation of Structural Reliability of Steel Frames: Interstory Drift versus Plastic Hysteretic Energy vol.27, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3609856
  3. Energy Dissipation and Local, Story, and Global Ductility Reduction Factors in Steel Frames under Vibrations Produced by Earthquakes vol.2018, pp.1875-9203, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9713685
  4. Role of accidental torsion in seismic reliability assessment for steel buildings vol.9, pp.5, 2009, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2009.9.5.457
  5. Energy-based damage index for steel structures vol.10, pp.4, 2002, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2010.10.4.331