DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Visual Preferences for Simulated Restorations of Disturbed Coastal Landscapes

  • 발행 : 2002.03.31

초록

This study intends to find out what manmade elements in typical moderately disturbed coastal landscape are most adversely affecting its aesthetic quality. Simulation photos including a combination of five most common manmade structures (houses, roads, power lines, embankments, and aquaculture facilities) found on coastal areas were made, and thirty eight subjects in the field of landscape architecture and forty eight average subjects were asked to evaluate their visual preferences of the 32 simulation photos using seven levels of Likert scale. Overall, average and professional subjects did not show significant differences in their evaluations. Visual preferences were greatly influenced by the presence of the manmade structures. A natural coastal landscape without any manmade structures was most preferable, and a disturbed coastal landscape by all five manmade structures was least preferable. Power lines had the most serious negative impact on the landscape, and followed by the embankment. In coastal landscape restoration works and management, priority needs to be given to these manmade structures which have bigger negative landscape impacts.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ahn, T.-M. 1997. Coastal Landscape Conservation in Che-ju Islands, Korea. Proceedings of International Conference on Coastal and Marine Tourism held at Honam Univ. Korea.
  2. Joo, S.-H. 1998. A study on the visual simulation methods: the effects of sounds and videos. Thesis, Graduate School of Seoul National University.
  3. Kim, D.-H. 1991. A study on the reliability and validity of landscape simulation. Thesis, Graduate School of Seoul National University.
  4. Lee, E.-J. 2001. A study on the analysis of the visual screen ratio to conserve the coastal landscape. Thesis, Graduate School of Seoul National University.
  5. Lee, H.-S. 1998. A study on the visual assessment of coastal landscape. J. Korean Institute of Port Studies, 12(2), 349-361.
  6. Morgan, R. 1999. Some factors affecting coastal landscape aesthetic quality assessment. Landscape Research, 24(2), 167-184. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426399908706557
  7. Park, K.-S. 2000. A study on the landscape simulation in environmental impact statements. Thesis, Graduate School of Seoul National University.
  8. Wallace, B.C. 1974. Landscape Evaluation and the Essex Coast. Reg. Stud. 8, 299-305, quoted in Zube et al. 1982. Landscape Perception: Research, Application and Theory. Landscape Planning, 9, 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3924(82)90009-0
  9. Yang, A.-S. 1987. Study on the predictive model of visual preference in the coastalscape of port city. Thesis, Graduate School of Seoul National University.