대한가정학회지 (Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association)

  • 제40권9호
  • /
  • Pages.207-221
  • /
  • 2002
  • /
  • 1225-0937(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-2818(eISSN)
대한가정학회 (The Korean Home Economics Association)
권호 표지

부양지원 경험의 보상이 심리적 복지감에 미치는 영향

Perceived Gains in Caregiving and Psychological Well-Being

  • 발행 : 2002.09.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of perceived gain in caregiving on the positive aspects of psychological well-being. The data were gathered from 262 informal caregivers who provided care for relatives or friends in need due to illness or disability. The main results were as follows: First, overall level of perceived gain in caregiving was above the median level. Second, higher gains were perceived by the caregivers who were more educated and who had more remote relationships with care recipients. Third, perceived gain was a significant variable influencing caregiver' psychological well-being. In addition, when the perceived gain variable was added to the regression model, no socio-demographic characteristics of the caregiver and the caregiving context were found to be related to psychological well-being. Theoretical and practical implications of these results were discussed.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김윤정(1999). 사회적 지지 관점으로 본 가족부양이 노인의 정신건강에 미치는 영향: 기능취약노인의 복지감과 우울감을 중심으로. 이화여자대학교 대학원 박사학위논문
  2. 김윤정, 최혜경(1993). 장애기간과 부양자의 대처자원이 부양자의 부담 및 부양만족감에 미치는 영향. 한국노년학, 13(2), 63-83
  3. 김진선(2000). 여성 가족부양자의 건강상태 및 가족 부양의 부정적. 긍정적인 영향. 대한간호학회지, 30(3), 632-646
  4. 김태현(1981). 한국에 있어서 노인부양에 관한 연구. 고려대학교 대학원 박사학위논문
  5. 서미혜, 오가실(1993). 만성질환자 가족의 부담감에 관한 연구. 간호학회지, 23(3), 467-486
  6. 송효석(1989). 가족의 노인부양에 관한 연구. 연세대학교 대학원 석사학위논문
  7. 신기영(1999). 중년기 기혼 취업여성의 가족역할과 직업역할의 보상/비용에 따른 심리적 복지. 서울대학교 대학원 박사학위논문
  8. 양옥경(2000). 의존성 노인의 부양에 관한 연구. 사회과학연구논총, 5, 167-190
  9. 윤현숙, 차흥봉, 조양순(2000). 뇌졸중 노인 부양가족의 부양부담과 우울에 미치는 영향요인에 관한 연구. 한국노년학, 20(2), 137-153
  10. 이가옥, 이미진(2000). 장기요양보호노인 가족수발자의 정서적 부양부담에 관한 연구. 한국노년학, 20(2), 215-228
  11. 이경순(1996). 치매환자 가족의 돌봄경험. 정신간호학회지, 5(2), 50-58
  12. 이숙현(1999). 노인과 간병. 여성한국사회연구회 편. 노인과 한국사회. 서울: 사회문화연구소. 231-261
  13. 이은희(1999). 치매노인 부양가족원의 부양부담에 관한 연구. 노인복지연구, 2, 211-239
  14. 이형실(1992). 노부모 부양경험의 차이에 관한 연구. 한국노년학, 12(2), 41-50
  15. 한경혜(1998). 만성질환노인 부양체계로서의 가족의 역할: 21세기 변화전망 및 지원책 모색. 한국노년학, 18(1), 46-58
  16. 한경혜, 윤성은(2002). 한국 성인 남녀의 부양지원 제공 실태와 특성. 한국가정관리학회지, 20(1), 65-73
  17. 한경혜, 이정화,Ryff, C, Marks, N. F.(2002). 성공적인 중년기 발달요인 탐색: 정신건강 및 일/가족 라이프코스의 한. 미간 비교연구. 학술진흥재단 협동연구 결과 보고서. 미간행
  18. Albert, S. M. (1991). Cognition of caregiving tasks: Multidimensional scaling of the caregiver taskdomain. The Gerontologist, 31, 726-734 https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/31.6.726
  19. Allen, K. R., Blieszner, R., & Roberto, K. A (2000). Families in the middle and later years: Areview and critique of research in 1990s. Journal ofMarriage and the Family, 62, 911-926 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00911.x
  20. Barer, B. M. & Johnson, C. L. (1990). A critique of caregiving literature. The Gerontologist, 30, 26-29 https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/30.1.26
  21. Brody, E. M. (1981). Women in the middle and family help to older people. The Gerontologist, 21,471-480 https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/21.5.471
  22. Farran, C. J. (1997). Theoretical perspectives concerning positive aspects of caring for elderly persons with Dementia: Stress/adaptations and existentialism. The Gerontologist, 37, 250-256 https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/37.2.250
  23. George, L. K. & Gwyther, L. P. (1986). Caregiver well-being: A multidimensional examination of family caregivers of demented adults. The Gerontologist, 26, 253-259 https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/26.3.253
  24. Hoyert, D. L. & Seltzer, M. M. (1992). Factors related to the well-being and life activities of family caregivers. Family Relations, 41, 74-81 https://doi.org/10.2307/585397
  25. Horowitz, A (1985). Family caregiving to the frail elderly. In C. Eisdorfer, M P. Lawton, & G. L. Maddox(Eds.), Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics, vol. 5(pp. 194-246). New York: Springer
  26. Horowitz, A (1992). Methodological issues in the study of gender within family caregiving relationship. In J. W. Dwyer & R. T. Coward(Eds.), Gender, families, and elder care(pp. 132-150). Newbury Park, CA: Sage
  27. Kling, K. C, Seltzer, M. M., & Ryff, C. D. (1997). Distinctive late-life challenges: Implications for coping and well-being. Psychology and Aging, 12, 288-295 https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.12.2.288
  28. Kramer, B. J. (1997). Gain in the caregiving experience: Where are we? What next? Gerontologist, 37, 218-232 https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/37.2.218
  29. Krause N, Herzog R, & Baker E. (1992). Providing support to others and well being in later life. Journal of Gerontology, 47(5), P300-P311 https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/47.5.P300
  30. Lawton, M. P., Moss, M., Kleban, M. H., Glicksman, A, & Rovine. M (1991). A two-factor model of caregiving appraisal and psychological wellbeing. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Science, 46, 181-189
  31. Levesque, L., Cossette, S., & Laurin, L. (1995). A multidimensional examination of the psychological and social well-being of caregivers of a demented relative. Research on Aging, 17, 332-360 https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027595173005
  32. Marks, N. F. (1994). Midlife caregiving: Do effects differ by gender? NSFH Working Paper, 64
  33. Marks, N. F. (1996). Caregiving across the lifespan: National prevalence and predictors. Family Relations, 45, 27-36 https://doi.org/10.2307/584767
  34. Marks, N. F. & Lambert, J. D. (1997). Family caregiving: Contemporary trends and issues. NSFH Working Paper, 78
  35. Marks, N. F. & Lambert, J. D. (1999). Transitions to caregiving, gender, psychological well-being: Prospective evidence from the national survey of families and households. NSFH Working Paper, 82
  36. Moen, P., Robinson, J., & Dempster-McClain, D. (1995). Caregiving and women's well-being: A life course approach. Journal of Health and Social behavior, 36, 259-273 https://doi.org/10.2307/2137342
  37. National Alliance for Caregiving & The American Association of Retired Persons (1997). Family caregiving in the U.S.: Findings from a national survey. Bethesda, MD: NAC and Washington, DC: AARP
  38. Nolan, M, Grant, G.,& Keady, J. (1996). Understanding family care. Buckingham: Open University Press
  39. Noonan, A. E., & Tennstedt, S. L. (1997). Meaning in caregiving and its contribution to caregiver well-being. The Gerontologist, 37, 785-794 https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/37.6.785
  40. Pearlin, L. I., Mullan, J. T., Semple, S. J., & Skaff, M. M. (1990). Caregiving and stress process: An overview of concepts and their measures. The Gerontologist, 30, 583-594 https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/30.5.583
  41. Penning, M. J. (1998). In the middle: Parental caregiving in the context of other roles. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 53B, S188-S197.
  42. Reid, J. & Hardy, M (1999). Multiple roles and wellbeing among midlife women: Testing role strain and role enhancement theories. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 54B, S329-S338 https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/54B.6.S329
  43. Riedel, S. E., Fredman, L., & Langenberg, P. (1998). Association among caregiving difficulties, burden, and rewards in caregivers to older post-rehabilitation patients. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 53B, P165-P174 https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/53B.3.P165
  44. Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069-1081 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069
  45. Scharlach, A. E. (1994). Caregiving and employment: Competing or complementary roles? The Gerontologist, 34, 378-385 https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/34.3.378
  46. Stephens, M A. P., Franks, M. M., & Townsend, A 1. (1994). Stress and rewards in women's multiple roles: The case of women in the middle. Psychology and Aging, 9, 45-52 https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.9.1.45
  47. Walker, A. J., Martin, S. K, & Jones, L. L. (1992). The benefits and costs of caregiving and care receiving for daughters and mothers. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 47, S130-S139.