대한가정학회지 (Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association)

  • 제40권9호
  • /
  • Pages.1-15
  • /
  • 2002
  • /
  • 1225-0937(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-2818(eISSN)
대한가정학회 (The Korean Home Economics Association)
권호 표지

다면적인 가격지각이 의복구매과정에 미치는 영향 - 구매태도 및 행동과의 관계를 중심으로 -

The Multi-Faceted Influence of Price on Consumers' Purchasing Process of Apparel Products - Relationships with Attitudinal and Behavioral Variables -

  • 발행 : 2002.09.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The multi-faceted influence of price on consumers' purchasing process of apparel products: Relationships with attitudinal and behavioral variables Price has a significant relationship to clothing products not only because of its practical, emotional and symbolic attributes but also because of its wide range and frequent changes. The purpose of this study was to identify the multi-faceted influence of price on consumers' purchasing process of clothing products. Six types of price-perceptions were related to various attitudinal and behavioral variables in a clothing purchase. A questionnaire was developed and data were collected from 720 adult women living in Seoul. Factor analysis, multiple regression, t-test and canconical correlation were employed to analyze the data. Low price consciousness was negatively related to product-oriented aspects of clothing and effected the one-price sale, visiting public markets and using interpersonal sources of price information. Value for money consciousness was positively related to product-oriented aspects of clothing and consumers' age or marriage and effected price considerations at the on-purchase and post-purchase stage. Price-quality inference was related to product-oriented and market-oriented aspects of clothing while price-prestige inference was related to visual and symbolic aspects of clothing and effected normal-price purchasing. Sale proneness was related to market-oriented aspects of clothing and effected seasonal sale price purchasing and price mavenism was related to market-oriented and visual aspects of clothing and effected price considerations at the pre-purchase stage.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김의성 (1990). 가격정보 단서효과 소비자 특성간의 관계에 관한 연구. 서울대학교 대학원 석사학위논문
  2. 김태수(1991). 가격할인규모와 상표친숙도에 따른 상표선택연구: 귀인이론을 적용한 분석. 고려대학교 대학원 석사학위논문
  3. 김현철 (1990). 가격고저와 할인 규모가 소비자 구매 태도에 미치는 영향. 중앙대학교 대학원 석사학위논문
  4. 민유정 (1992). 할인광고와 의복구매행동에 관한 연구. 숙명여대 대학원 석사학위논문
  5. 박명숙 (1991). 소비자가 인지한 가격에 대한 품질만족에 관한 연구. 한국가정관리학회지, 9(2), 37-48
  6. 박병희, 이상협 (1990). 한국시장에 있어서의 외국/국내 청의류의 가격과 품질에 관한 연구. 소비자학연구, 1(1), 66-87
  7. 이영준(1992). 다변량분석. 도서출판나남
  8. 이규혜, 이은영(2002). 의복가격지각의 다차원성에 관한 연구: 구매행동 유형화를 중심으로. 한국의류학회지, 26(6), 877-888
  9. 진병호(1998a). 의복구매시 소비자가 지각하는 가격(제1보): 의복가격 차원의 타당성 검증. 한국의류학회지, 22(3), 417-427
  10. 진병호(1998b). 의복구매시 소비자가 지각하는 가격(제2보): 제품관여와 소비자 지식이 의복가격의 각 차원 지각에 미치는 영향. 한국의류학회지, 22(5), 628-638
  11. 진병호, 고애란(1999). 의류구매시 소비자가 지각하는 다양한 가격 차원이 쾌락적 쇼핑가치에 미치는 영향. 소비자학연구, 10(3), 67-84
  12. 최규선(1988). 소매점의 비교(할인)가격 광고가 소비자의 가격 지각에 미치는 영향. 연세대학교 대학원 석사학위논문
  13. 최선형(1993). 의류제품의 감정적 속성에 관한 연구. 서울대학교 대학원 석사학위논문
  14. 최호식(1985). 할인판매가 소비자의 구매태도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구(유명여성기성복을 중심으로). 연세대학교 대학원 석사학위논문
  15. 편신덕(1993). 상표이미지가 의류제품의 품질-가격지각에 미치는 영향. 효성여자대학교 대학원석사학위논문
  16. Buns, L. D. & Bryant, N. O. (2002). Business of fashion: Designing, manufaduring and marketing(2nd ed.). NY: Fairchild
  17. Delong, M, Minshall, B, & Larnz, K. (1986). Use of schema for evaluating consumers' response toan apparel product. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 5(1), 17-26 https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X8600500103
  18. Dodds, W. B. & Monroe, K. B. (1985). The effect of brand and price information on subjective product evaluations. Advances in Consumer Research, 12, 85-90
  19. Eckman, M., Damhorst, M. L., & Kadolph, S. J. (1990). Toward a model of the in-storepurchase decision process: Consumer use of criteria for evaluating women's apparel. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 8(2), 13-22 https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X9000800202
  20. Flynn, L. R. & Goldsmith, R. E. (1993). Application of the personal involvement inventory in marketing. Psychology and Marketing, 10(4),357-366 https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.4220100409
  21. Forsythe, S. M. (1991). The effect of private, designer and national brand names on shopper's perception on apparel quality and price. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 9(2), 1-6 https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X9100900201
  22. Gaal, B. & Burns, L. D. (2001). Apparel descriptionsin catalogs and perceived risk associated withcatalog purchases. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 19(1), 22-30 https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X0101900103
  23. Heisey, F. L. (1990). Perceived quality and predicted price: Use of the minimum information environment in evaluating apparel. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 8(4), 22-28 https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X9000800404
  24. Hirshman, E. C. & Holbrook, M. B. (1982). Hedonic consumption: Emerging concepts, methods, and properties. Journal of Marketing, 46, 92-101
  25. Houston, M. J. & Rothschild, M. L. (1978). Conceptual and methodological perspectives on involvement. In S. C. Jain(Ed.), 1978 Educators' Proceedings(pp.184-187). Chicago: American Marketing Association
  26. Jacoby, J., Olsen, J. C. (1988). Consumer response toprice: An attitudinal, information processing perspectives. In Y. Winds & P. Greeberg(Eds.), Moving ahead with attitude research(pp. 73-86). Chicago: American Marketing Association
  27. Jin, B. & Koh, A. (1999). Difference between southKorean male and female consumers in theclothing brand loyalty formation process: Model testing. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 17(3), 117-127 https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X9901700302
  28. Kapferer, J.-N. & Laurent, G. (1985). Consumers involvement profile: New empirical results. Advances in Consumer Research, 12, 290-295
  29. Kirby, G. H. & Dardis, R. (1986). Research note: Apricing study of woman's apparel in off-price and department store. Journal of Retailing, 62(3), 61-68
  30. Nystrom, H, Tamsons, H., & Thams, R. (1975). An experiment in price generalization and discrimination. Journal of Marketing Research, 12, 177-181 https://doi.org/10.2307/3150440
  31. Richins, M. L. & Bloch, P. H. (1986). After the new wears off: The temporal context of product involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 280-285 https://doi.org/10.1086/209067
  32. Shapiro, B. P. (1968). The psychology of pricing. Harvard Business Review, 46, 14-25
  33. Shim, S. & Kotsiopulos: A. (1994). A typology asapparel shopping orientation among female consumers. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 12(1), 73-85 https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X9301200110
  34. Sproles, B. (1979). Fashion: Consumer behavior toward dress. Minneapolis; Burgess
  35. Summers, T. A. & Wozniak, P. J. (1990). Discountstore patronage preferences of rural and urban woman. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 8(3), 1-6 https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X9000800301
  36. Tigert, D. J., Ring, L. R, & King, C. W. (1976). Fashion involvement and buying behavior: A methodological study. Advances in Consumer Research, 3, 46-52
  37. Uptal, M. (1998). Involvement-response models of joint effects: An empirical test and extension. Advances in Consumer Research, 25, 499-506
  38. Willenborg, J. F. & Pitts, R E. (1977). Perceived situational effects on price sensitivity. Journal of Business Research, 5(1), 27-38 https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(77)90024-8
  39. Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52, 2-22 https://doi.org/10.2307/1251446