DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

THE EFFECTS OF SURFACE CONTAMINATION BY HEMOSTATIC AGENTS ON THE SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF COMPOMER

지혈제 오염이 콤포머의 전단결합강도에 미치는 영향

  • Heo, Jeong-Moo (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Kwak, Ju-Seog (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Lee, Hwang (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Lee, Su-Jong (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Im, Mi-Kyung (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University)
  • 허정무 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 곽주석 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 이황 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 이수종 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 임미경 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실)
  • Published : 2002.03.01

Abstract

One of the latest concepts in bonding are "total etch", in which both enamel and dentin are etched with an acid to remove the smear layers, and "wet dentin" in which the dentin is not dry but left moist before application of the bonding primer Ideally the application of a bonding agent to tooth structure should be insensitive to minor contamination from oral fluids. Clinically, contaminations such as saliva, gingival fluid, blood and handpiece lubricant are often encountered by dentists during cavity preparation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of contamination by hemostatic agents on shear bond strength of compomer restorations. One hundred and ten extracted human maxillary and mandibular molar teeth were collected. The teeth were removed soft tissue remnant and debris and stored in physiologic solution until they were used. Small flat area on dentin of the buccal surface were wet ground serially with 400, 800 and 1200 abrasive papers on automatic polishing machine. The teeth were randomly divided into 11 groups. Each group was conditioned as follows : Group 1: Dentin surface was not etched and not contaminated by hemostatic agents. Group 2: Dentin surface was not etched but was contaminated by Astringedent$^{\circledR}$(Ultradent product Inc., Utah, U.S.A.) Group 3: Dentin surface was not etched but was contaminated by Bosmin$^{\circledR}$(Jeil Pharm, Korea.). Group 4: Dentin surface was not etched but was contaminated by Epri-dent$^{\circledR}$(Epr Industries, NJ, U.S.A.). Group 5: Dentin surface was etched and not contaminated by hemostatic agents. Group 6: Dentin sorface was etched and contaminated by Astringedent$^{\circledR}$. Group 7 : Dentin surface was etched and contaminated by Bosmin$^{\circledR}$. Group 8: Dentin surface was etched and contaminated by Epri-dent$^{\circledR}$. Group 9: Dentin surface was contaminated by Astringedent$^{\circledR}$. The contaminated surface was rinsed by water and dried by compressed air. Group 10: Dentin surface was contaminated by Bosmin$^{\circledR}$. The contaminated surface was rinsed by water and dried by compressed air. Group 11 : Dentin surface was contaminated by Epri-dent$^{\circledR}$. The contaminated surface was rinsed by water and dried by compressed air. After surface conditioning, F2000$^{\circledR}$ was applicated on the conditoned dentin surface The teeth were thermocycled in distilled water at 5$^{\circ}C$ and 55$^{\circ}C$ for 1,000 cycles. The samples were placed on the binder with the bonded compomer-dentin interface parallel to the knife-edge shearing rod of the Universal Testing Machine(Zwick Z020, Zwick Co., Germany) running at a cross head speed or 1.0 mm/min. Group 2 showed significant decrease in shear bond strength compared with group 1 and group 6 showed significant decrease in shear bond strength compared with group 5. There were no significant differences in shear bond strength between group 5 and group 9, 10 and 11.

Keywords

References

  1. McLean JW, Nicholson JW, Wilson AD. Proposed nomenclature for glass-ionomer dental cements and realted material. Quintessence Int 25:587-589, 1994
  2. Christensen GJ. Compomers vs resin-reinforced glass ionomers. J Am Dent Assoc 128:479-480, 1997
  3. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhession of acrylic filling materials to enamel surface. J Dent Res 34:849-853, 1955 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345550340060801
  4. Swift EJ. Perdigao J, Heymann HO. Bonding to enaeml and dentin: A brief hsitory and state of the art. Quintessence Int 26:95-110, 1995
  5. Barkmeier WW, Los SA, Triolo PT. Bond strength and SEM evaluation of Clearfil Liner Bond 2. Am J Dent 10:141-146, 1997
  6. Gordan VV, Vargas MA, Cobb DS, Denehy GE. Evaluation of adhesive systems using acidic primers. Am J Dent 10:219-223, 1997
  7. Vargas MA. Interfacial ultrastructure of a self-etching primer/adhesive[abstract 95 0]. J Dent Res 78:224, 1999
  8. Kaneshima T, Yatani H, Kasai T, Watanabe EK, Yamashita A. The influence of blood contamination on bond strengths between dentin and adhesive resin cement. Operative Dentistry 25:195-201, 2000
  9. John M, Werner J, Jianxiu X. Bonding of composite resin to contaminated human enamel and dentin. J Prostho 4:28-32, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.1995.tb00311.x
  10. Xie J. Powers JM, McGuckin RS. In vitro bond strength of two adhesives to enamel and dentin under normal and contaminated conditions. Dent Mater 9:295-299, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(93)90046-S
  11. Waston TF. A confocal optical microscope study of the morphology of the tooth/restoration using Scotchbond 2 dentin adhesive. J Dent Res 68:1124-1131. 1989 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345890680061301
  12. Kanca J. Resin bonding to wet substrate .I. Bonding to dentin. Quintessence Int 23:39-41, 1992
  13. Castro AK, Hara AT, Pimenta LA. Influence of collagen removal on shear bond strength of one-bottle adhesive systems in dentin. J Adhes Dent 2:271-277, 2000
  14. Perdiago J, Lopes M, Geraldeli S, Garcia-Godoy F. Effect of a sodium hypochlorite gel on dentin bonding. Dent Mater 16:311-323, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00021-X
  15. Schwartz RS, Summitt JB, Robbins JW. Fundamental of Operative dentistry: a contemporary approach Chicage. Quintessence Pub Co 141-157, 1996
  16. Masashi M, Ko H, Hideo O, Moore BK. Influence of light intensity on shear bond strenth to dentin. Am J Dent 8:245-248, 1995
  17. Hinoura K, Miyazaki, Onose H. Effect of irradiation time to light-cured resin composite on dentin bond strength. Am J Dent 4:273-276, 1991
  18. Pashley EL, Tao L, Mackert JR, et al. Comparison of in vivo vs in vitro bonding of composite resin to the dentine of canine teeth. J Dent Res 67:467-470, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345880670020601
  19. Bruno T, Harald O, Edward J. Shear bond strengths of one-bottle adhesives to oil-contaminated enamel. J Esthet Dent 12:139-145, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2000.tb00213.x
  20. Ibrahim H, Franklin G. Saliva contamination and bond strength of single-bottle adhesives to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 10:83-87, 1997
  21. Douglas WH, Reeh ES, Raj PA, et al. Statherin: A major boundary lubricant of haman saliva. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 180:91-97, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-291X(05)81259-8
  22. Nakabayashi N, Ashizawa M, Nakamura M. Identification of a resin dentin hybrid layer in vital human dentin created in vivo: Durable bonding to vital dentin. Quintessence Int 23:135-141, 1992
  23. Gwinnett AJ. Moist versus dry dentin: Its effect on shear bond strength, Am J Dent 5: 127-129, 1992
  24. Yamamoto T. The effect of contamination on the adhesion of composite resin to etched enamel surface. Jpn J Consev Dent 24:93-114, 1981
  25. Tomas J, Karl J. Some effects of water on dentin bonding. Dent Mater 11:132-136. 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(95)80048-4
  26. Ali I, Carel L. Bonding efficiency and interfacial morphology of one-bottle adhesives to contaminated dentin surfaces. Am J Dent 11:281-285, 1998
  27. Woody RD. Miller A, Staffanou RS. Review of the pH of hemostatic agents used in tissue displacement. J Prosthet Dent 70:191-192, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90018-J
  28. Martin F, Carla C, William M. Smear layer instability caused by hemostatic agents. J Prosthet Dent 76:477-482, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90004-9
  29. Watanabe I, Nakabayashi N. Pashley DH. Bonding to ground dentin by a Phenyl-P self-etching primer. J Dent Res 73:1212-1220, 1994
  30. 김명수, 온영석, 이광원, 손호현. 인산용액의 농도 및 적용시간차이에 따른 상아질 표면의 형태적 변화. 대한치과보존학회지 23:141-155, 1998