DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Co-occurrence Phenomenon of Both Korean and Non-Korean Literatures Within the Korean References - An Analysis on the Citation Motivations and References by Social Scientists -

참고문헌의 동시공존현상 - 한국 사회과학자들의 인용동기와 참고문헌의 분석 -

  • 김갑선 (성균관대학교한국사서교육원, 숙명여자대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Published : 2002.12.01

Abstract

The present study, on the bass of a premise that reference lists are one of the social products, reflecting various social environments of their own society, was made as part of an attempt to explore the co-occurrence phenomenon of both Korean and Non-Korean Literatures occurred within the Korean references. 321 authors (articles) of 43 Korean journals on Social Sciences were surveyed on research channels and citation motivations and their 11358 references were analyzed. The findings are as follows : 1) The extent of the co-occurrence was that Non-Korean literatures were more 1.9 times (65.3%) cited than Korean ones and English (61.5%)-American (50.4%) predominancy was heavily found. 2) Research channel, worked as an indicator of the identity of researcher as well as the source of research ideas was most Non-Korean channel orientedness (55.8%). 3) Citation motivations were significantly depended on whether Korean or Non-Korean literatures and non-Korean literatures were cheifly cited to be conceptual motivations than other motivations. 4) Research channel among variables was worked as a main effect predicting major citation motivations on Non-Korean literatures. Finally, this study is very suggestive : 1) It might be a new approach and interpretation by adopting citation motivations to explore a process of knowledge producting of researchers 2) Partly, it proved empirically the relationship of knowledge producted by Korean researchers to Non-Korean knowledge through the analysis of citation motivations.

본 연구는 참고문헌을 해당 사회의 다양한 사회적 환경을 반영한 사회적 산물임을 전제로 하여 한국의 사회 과학분야의 참고문헌리스트에서 발생하는 국내문헌과 국외문헌의 동시공존현상을 연구자들의 지식생산의 논의과정에서 작동된 인용동기와 그 참고문헌의 분석을 통해 심층적으로 탐구하기 위한 시도이다. 한국의 사회과학분야의 학술지에서 24종의 43부가 선정되어 321명(73.8%)의 저자들에게 연구채널과 인용동기가 서베이되었고, 이들의 11,358개의 참고문헌이 분석되었으며, 국내문헌과 국외문헌의 인용동기의 차이와 국외문헌의 인용동기에 영향을 미치는 요인들을 밝혀냈다. 주요 연구결과는 다음과 같다 : 1) 참고문헌의 동시공존의 정도는 국외문헌이 국내문헌보다 1.9배 (65.3%)로 우세하게 출현하였으며, 언어와 출판지 분포에서 영어(61.5%)-미국(50.4%) 우세성이 발견되었다. 2) 연구아이디어 획득의 정보원이자 연구자의 정체성 지표로서 작용된 연구채널은 상당히 국외채널 지향적(55.8%) 이었다. 3) 인용동기는 국내문헌과 국외문헌에 따라 유의적인 차이가 있었으며, 우세한 국외문헌의 인용동기는 개념적인 동기(20.7%)와 형식적 동기(16.0%)였다. 4) 국외문헌의 인용동기는 제 변인과 유의적인 관련성이 있었으며, 특히 연구채널은 국외문헌의 다양한 인용동기를 예측하는 주효과임이 밝혀졌다. 또한 본 연구의 의의와 향후과제가 논의되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. 제13차 한국여성학회 추계학술대회 여성학연구자들의 정보이용행태 및 정보기술의 이용 김갑선
  2. 한국문헌정보학회지 v.33 no.1 인용동기와 인용환경요인 모형 개발 김갑선
  3. 석사학위논문 국내학자들의 문헌인용행태에 대한 연구 유현진
  4. 교육학연구 v.21 no.9 외국이론의 도입과 교육이론의 토착화 이종각
  5. 정보관리학회지 v.11 no.1 한국 전기 전자공학 분야의 인용 분석연구 이해영
  6. 정보관리학회지 v.13 no.2 한국과 일본의 기계공학 분야의 인용분석 비교연구 최상기
  7. Social Studies of Science v.27 Referring to schools of thought: An example of symbolic citations Allen, Bryce https://doi.org/10.1177/030631297027006004
  8. Scientometrics v.15 no.5-6 Citations: Indicators of significance? Amsterdamska, Olga;L.Leydesdorff https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017065
  9. Journal ot the American Society for Information Science v.36 no.4 Private acts and public objects: An Investigation of citer motivations Brooks, Terrence A. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630360402
  10. Journal ot the American Society for Information Science v.37 no.1 Evidence of complex citer motivations Brooks, Terrence A. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630370106
  11. Social Studies of Science v.5 Content analysis of references: Adjunct or alternative to citation counting? Chubin,D.E.;S.D.Moitra https://doi.org/10.1177/030631277500500403
  12. Scientometrics v.15 no.5-6 What do citations count? : The rhetoric-first model Cozzens, Susan E. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017064
  13. Library Quarterly v.49 no.4 The use of citations in literary research: A preliminary classification of citation functions Frost, Carolyn O. https://doi.org/10.1086/600930
  14. American Documentation v.16 no.3 The Norms of citation behavior: Prolegomena to the footnote Kaplan,N.
  15. Scientometrics v.19 no.3-4 Does place of publication influence citation behavior? Lancaster,F.W.;S.K.Lee;C.Diluvio https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02095350
  16. American Documentation v.16 no.2 Improvement of the selectivity of citation indexes to science literature through the inclusion of citation relationship indicators Lipetz, Ben-Ami https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090160207
  17. Journal of Information Science v.19 no.1 A Study of citing motivation of Chinese scientists Liu, Mengxiong https://doi.org/10.1177/016555159301900103
  18. Social Studies of Science v.5 Some results of the function and quality of citation Moravcsik, Michael J.;Poovanalingam Murugesan https://doi.org/10.1177/030631277500500106
  19. Journal of the American Society for Information Science v.29 no.3 Variation of the nature of citation measures with journals and scientific specialities Murugesan, Poovanalingam;Michael J. Moravcsik https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630290307
  20. Journal of the American Society for Information Science v.29 no.5 Highly cited old papers and the reasons why they continue to be cited Oppenheim, Charls;Susan P. Renn
  21. Scientometrics v.5 no.4 Are methodological papers more cited than theoretical or empirical ones? : The case of sociology Peritz,B.C. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019738
  22. Scientometrics v.5 no.5 A Classification of citation roles for the social sciences and related fields Peritz,B.C. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02147226
  23. Social Studies of Science v.25 Auther judgements about works they cite : Three studies from psychology journals Shadish;William,R.(et al.) https://doi.org/10.1177/030631295025003003
  24. Scientometrics v.12 no.1-2 A Quasi-quantitative citation model Vinkler,P. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016689
  25. Encyclopaedia of Library and Information Science v.5 Citation indexes Weinstock, Melvin

Cited by

  1. The Study on the Genealogy and Impact Factor of Papers by Citation Analysis vol.44, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2010.44.2.357
  2. A Study of Citing Patterns of Korean Scientists on Korean Journals vol.28, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.2.097
  3. Citing Behavior of Korean Scientists on Foreign Journals in KSCD vol.28, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.2.117
  4. Intellectual Structure and Infrastructure of Informetrics: Domain Analysis from 2001 to 2010 vol.28, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.2.011
  5. Patterns of Citing Korean DOI Journals According to CrossRef's Cited-by Linking and a Local Journal Citation Database vol.1, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1633/JISTaP.2013.1.2.4