Studies on the Comparative Performance of Victory-1, S-36 and Kanva-2 Mulberry Genotypes and their Impact on Silkworm Rearing under Telangana Conditions of Andhra Pradesh.

  • Venkataramana, P. (C. S. R. T. I. Research Extension Centre, Central Silk Board) ;
  • Suryanarayana, N. (Regional Sericultural Research Station) ;
  • Kumar, Vineet (Regional Sericultural Research Station) ;
  • Sarkar, A. (Central Sericultural Research and Training Institute)
  • Published : 2002.12.01

Abstract

A new high yielding mulberry genotype, Victory-1 (V-1) was recommended to the field for irrigated areas by Central Sericultural Research and Training Institute (CSRTI), Mysore during 1996-1997. As K-2 and S-36 mulberry genotypes are already in the field, a study on the comparative performance of V-1, 5-36 and K-2 varieties, in terms of leaf yield, yield attributes, leaf moisture and moisture retaining capacity and their impact on silkworm rearing was carried out under Telangana conditions of Andhra Pradesh during 1999-2001. Among the three genotypes the leaf yield was found to be significantly (P < 0.01) higher in V-1 (64,130 kg/ha/yr) followed by S-36 (44,064 kg/ha/yr) and K-2 (23,990 kg/ha/yr). The maximum leaf moisture was also observed in V-1 (71.84%) compared to S-36 (66.86%) and K-2 (64%). The moisture retaining ability was more in V-1 (70.17%) followed by S-36 (66.20%) and K-2 (60.08%). The yield attributes were found to be significantly (P < 0.01) enhanced in V-1 over S-36 and K-2. Silkworm rearing results (bioassay) indicated a significant (P < 0.01) reduction in larval duration and improvement in larval weight, effective rate of rearing by number and weight, single cocoon and shell weights and shell ratio in the silkworm lots fed on V-1 variety followed by S-36 and K-2. Hence, in this study, V-1 was found to be superior among the three varieties studied.

Keywords

References

  1. Anonymous (1970) Collection and maintenance of germplasm for the purpose of important varieties of mulberry. Annual Report, Central Sericultural Research and Training Institute, Mysore, pp. 40-54
  2. Cheluvachari, C. (1994) Studies on leaf quality evaluation of a few selected mulberry varieties. Ph. D. Thesis, Bangalore University, Bangalore, India
  3. Dandin, S. B., M. S. Jolly, B. N. Susheelamma, R. S. Mallikarjunappa and C. R. Sastry (1983) Evaluation and utilization of existing genetic variability in mulberry. National Seminar on Silk Research and Development, Bangalore, March 10-13, p. 2
  4. Das, P. K., K. Vijayaraghavan and M. S. Jolly (1983) Preliminary observation on the effect of feeding with washed and dusty mulberry leaves on the performance of four races of silkworm, Bombyx mori (L.). National Seminar on Silk Research and Development, March 10-13 Bangalore (Abstract), pp. 114
  5. Das, P. K. and K. Vijayaraghavan (1990) Studies on the effect of different mulberry varieties and season on the larval development and cocoon characters of silkworm Bombyx mori L. Indian J. Seric. 29, 44-53
  6. Fotadar, R. K. (1995) Evaluation and utilization of variability in mulberry gene pool under temperature conditions. Ph. D. Thesis, Bangalore University, Bangalore, India
  7. Giridhar, K. and N. Sivarami Reddy (1991) Effective rate of rearing in bivoltive silkworm (Bombyx mori L.) breeds on different mulberry (Morus spp.) varieties. Indian J. Seric. 30, 88-90
  8. Hesketh, J. D., J. T. Wolley and D. B. Peters (1985) Physiology of genotypic differences in photosynthetic rate. Proceedings, World Soybean Research Conference-III, West View Press, Boulder Co
  9. Jolly, M. S. and S. B. Dandin (1986) Collection, conservation, and evaluation of mulberry (Morus spp) germplasm. Central Sericultural Research and Training Institute, Mysore, pp. 1-10
  10. Kasiviswanathan, K. S. Krishnaswami and C. V. Venkataramu (1973) Effect of storage on the moisture content of mulberry leaves, Indian J. Seric. 12, 13-21
  11. Krishnaswami, S. (1986a) Mulberry cultivation in South India. Central Silk Board, Bangalore, India, pp. 19
  12. Krishnaswami, S. (1986b) New technology of silkworm rearing. Central Silk Board, Bangalore, Indian pp. 23
  13. Krishnaswami, S., S. Kumararaj, K. Vijayaraghavan and K. Kasiviswanathan (1971) Silkworm feeding trials for evaluating the quality of mulberry leaves as influenced by variety, spacing and nitrogen fertilization, Indian J. Seric. 10, 79-89
  14. Krishnaswami, S., M. K. R. Noamani and M. Ahsan (1970) Studies on the quality of mulberry leaves and silkworm cocoon crop production. Part I. Quality differences due to varieties, Indian J. Seric. 9, 1-10
  15. Machii, H. and K. Katagiri (1990) Varietal differences in food value of mulberry leaves with special reference to production efficiency of cocoon shell. J. Seric. Sci. Jpn. 59, 34-48
  16. Miskin, K. E., D. C. Rasumsson and B. N. Mass (1972) Inheritance and physiological effects of stomatal frequency in barley. Crop Sci. 12, 780-783 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1972.0011183X001200060019x
  17. Nataraju, B., Murthuza Baig, R. Raju, S. Krishnaswami and M. V. Samson (1981) Feeding trials with different varieties of mulberry in relation of cocoon crop performance and incidence of loss due to disease; in Proceedings of sericulture symposium and seminar. Muthu Krishna, T. S. and S. R. Sree Rangaswamy (eds.), pp. 43-50, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India
  18. Narayana Prakash, R., K. Periswamy and S. Radhakrishna (1985) Effect of dietary water content on food utilization and silk production in Bombyx mod L. (Lepidoptera: Bombycidae). Indian J. Seric. 24, 12-17
  19. Paul, D. C., G. Subba Rao and D. C. Deb (1992) Impact of dietary moisture on nutritional indices and growth of Bombyx mori and concomitant larval duration. J. Insect Physiol. 38, 229 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1910(92)90071-K
  20. Pillai, S. V. (1979) Growth studies in silkworm Bombyx mori, with special reference to its economic characters, Ph. D. Thesis, Kerala University, Trivandrum
  21. Pillai, S. V. and M. S. Jolly (1985) An evaluation of the quality of the mulberry varieties reared under hill conditions and crop result of Bombyx mori. Indian J. Seric. 24, 48-52
  22. Radha, N. V., S. Lethchoumande, P. Rajeswari and G. Obliswami (1978) Effect of feeding with the leaves of different mulberry varieties on the races of silkworm. All India Symposium on Seri. Sci. UAS, Bangalore (Abstract), pp. 52
  23. Samokhalova, G. V., N. S. Simonov and V. M. Ionov (1972) Effect of food quality on the biology of Bombyx mori L. and the physio-chemical properties of the silk thread. Vestn. Mask. Univ. Ser. 6 Biol. Pochvovedenie 27, 19-24
  24. Saratchandra, B., L. Rajanna, K. Philomena, C. Paramesha, S. P. Ramesh, T. Jayappa and M. G. Sabitha (1992) An evaluation of elite mulberry varieties for yield and quality through bioassay. Sericologia 32, 127-134
  25. Sarkar, A., B. C. Das and S. K. Mandal (1983) Growth, yield and feeding value of initial diploid, triploid and tetraploid mulberry. National Seminar on Silk Research and Development, Bangalore, India, March 10-13, pp. 6
  26. Sarkar, A., S. Jalaja Kumar and R. K. Datta (2000) Gradual improvement of mulberry varieties under irrigated conditions in South India and the tropical program for varietal selection in the tropics, Sericologia 40, 449-461
  27. Sastry, C. R. (1984) Mulberry varieties, exploitation, and pathology. Sericologia 24, 333-359
  28. Scriber, J. M. (1978) The effects of larval feeding specialization and plant growth form on the consumption and cultivation of plant biomass and nitrogen. An ecological consideration. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 24, 694-710 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02385126
  29. Shablovaskaya, M. I. and A. G. Kafian (1967) Driving a mulberry variety with a high quality leaf. Silk 4, 8-10
  30. Snedecor, W. G. and G. W. Cochran (1967) In Statistical Methods. Oxford and IBH Publications, India
  31. Sujathamma, P. and S. B. Dandin (1998) Evaluation of mulberry (Morus spp.) genotypes for yield under Rayalaseema conditions of Andhra Pradesh. Indian J. Seric. 37, 133-136
  32. Susheelamma, B. N. and M. S. Jolly (1986) Evaluation of morpho-physiological parameters associated with drought resistance in mulberry, Indian J. Serc. 25, 6-14
  33. Susheelamma, B. N. R. G. Geethadevi, M. S. Jolly, S. Jalaja Kumar, K. Giridhar, K. Senugupta and Meera Verma (1989) Effect of different mulberry varieties on silkworm, Bomby mori L. Insect Sci. Appl. 10, 359-364
  34. Susheelamma, B. N., M. S. Jolly, K. Giridhar and K. Senugupta (1990) Evaluation of germplasm genotypes for drought resistance in mulberry. Sericologia 30, 327-341
  35. Tojyo, I. (1985) Research of polyploidy and its applications in Morus, JARQ 18, 222-228
  36. Thangamani, R. and M. Vivekanandan (1984) Physiological studies and leaf nutrient analysis in the evaluation of best mulberry varieties. Sericologia 24, 317-324
  37. Toshio, I. and A. Narihiro (1963) Food values of mulberry leaves for the silkworm Bombyx mori (L.) determined by means of artificial diets - Relationship between kinds of mulberry leaves and larval growth. Bull. Seri. Expt. Stn. 18, 226-229
  38. Ueda, S. and K. Suzuki (1967) Studies on the growth of the silkworm, Bombyx mori L. I. Chronological changes of the amount of food ingested and digested, food weight and water content of the body, their mutual relationship. Bull. Seric. Expt. Stn. 22, 65-67
  39. Waldbauer, G. P. (1968) The consumption and utilization of food by insects. Adv. Insect Physiol. 5, 229-288 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2806(08)60230-1
  40. Yokayama, T. (1963) 'Sericulture'. Ann. Rev. Ent. 8, 287-298 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.08.010163.001443
  41. Yoshitake, T. (1961) Studies on the effect of nutrition on the moulting in silkworm (Bombyx mori L.) II, Analysis of various factors concerning the judgement of nutritional value of mulberry leaf by means of moulting ratio of silkworm fed with leaf concerned. Bull. Seric. Expt. Stn. 17, 53-87