DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Dynamic Flow Admission Control for Providing DiffServ Efficiently in MPLS Networks

MPLS 네트워크에서 DiffServ를 효율적으로 적용하기 위한 동적 흐름 수락 제어

  • 임지영 (이화여자대학교 컴퓨터학과) ;
  • 채기준 (이화여자대학교 컴퓨터학과)
  • Published : 2002.02.01

Abstract

MPLS(Multiprotocol Label Switching) is regarded as a core technology for migrating to the next generation Internet. In this paper, we propose an dynamic flow admission control supporting DiffServ(Differentiated Services) to provide QoS in MPLS networks. Our proposed model dynamically adjusts the amount of admissible traffic based on transmittable capacity over one outgoing port. It then transmits the Packets while avoiding congested area resulting traffic loss. Ingress LSRs find out the congested area by collecting network state information at QoS state update for QoS routing table. Our Proposed model manages the resource efficiently by protecting the waste of resources that is a critical Problem of DiffServ and makes much more flows enter the network to be served.

본 논문에서는 차세대 인터넷으로 진화할 수 있는 새로운 핵심 기술로 평가받고 있는 MPLS(Multiprotocol Label Switching) 네트워크에서 QoS를 제공하기 위하여 DiffServ(Differentiated Services)를 지원하는 동적 흐름 수락 제어를 제안한다. 제안 모델은 아웃 포트의 전송 가능한 용량을 계산하여 이 용량에 맞게 흐름을 받아들이고 패킷을 전송한다. 또한 QoS 라우팅 테이블을 위한 정보 교환으로 혼잡 지역을 알 수 있는 ingress LSR은 혼잡 지역을 배제한 경로로 패킷을 전송하게 한다 이렇게 함으로써 제안 모델은 DiffServ의 단점으로 인정되는 자원 낭비를 막고 자원을 효율적으로 관리하여 자원의 이용률을 높이고 서비스 받기 위해 네트워크에 진입하는 흐름의 수를 높일 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. E. Rosen, A. Viswanathan, R. CalIon, 'Multiprotocol Label Switching Architecture,' RFC 3031, Jan. 2001
  2. R. Braden, et al., 'Integrated Services in the Internet Architecture : an Overview,' RFC 1633, Jun. 1994
  3. S. Blake, et al., 'An Architecture for Differentiated Services,' RFC 2475, Dec. 1998
  4. Bruce Davie, Yakov Rekhter, MPLS : Technology and Applications' Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 2000
  5. F. L. Faucheur, L. Wu, B. Davie, S. Davari, P. Vaananen, R. Krishnan, P. Cheval, J. Heinanen, 'MPLS Support of Differentiated Services,' Internet Draft (work in progress) draft-ietf-mpls-diff-ext-08.txt, Feb. 2001
  6. D. O. Awduche, L. Berger, D. Gan, T. Li, V. Srinivasan, G. Swallow, 'RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for LSP Tunnels,' Internet Draft (work in progress) draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-Isp-tunnel-08.txt, Feb. 2001
  7. A. Mankin, et al., 'Resource ReSerVation Protocol (RSVP) Version 1 Applicability Statement Some Guidelines on Deployment,' RFC 220S, Sep. 1997
  8. R. Branden et al., 'Resource ReSerVation Protocol (RSVP) Version 1 Functional Specification,' RFC 2205, Sep. 1997
  9. J. Wroclaswski, 'The Use of RSVP with IETF Integrated Services,' RFC 2210, Sep. 1997
  10. V. Jacobson, K. Nichols, K. Poduri, 'An Expected Forwarding PHB,' RFC 2598, Jun. 1999
  11. J. Heinanen, F. Baker, W. Weiss, K. Wroclawski, 'Assured Forwarding PHB Group,' RFC 2597, Jun. 1999
  12. J. Ash, Y. Lee, P. Ashwood, Smith, B. Jamoussi, D. Fedyk, D. Skalecki, L. Li, 'LSP Modification Using CR-LDP,' Internet Draft (work in progress) draft-ietf-mpls-crlsp-modify-03.txt, Mar. 2001
  13. L. Andersson, P. Doolan, N. Feldman, A. Fredette, B. Thomas, 'LDP Specification,' RFC 3036, Jan. 2001
  14. B. Jamoussi, 'Constraint-Based LSP Setup using LDP,' Internet Draft (work in progress) draft-ietf-mpls-cr-ldp-05.txt, Feb. 2001
  15. R. Neilson, J. Wheeler, F. Reichmeyer, S. Hares, 'A Discussion of Bandwidth Broker Requirements for Internet2 Qbone Deployment,' Internet2 Qbone BB Advisory Council, Ver.0.7, Aug. 1999
  16. 'Casnet II Differentiated Services Bandwidth Broker System Specification,' British Columbia Institute of Technology, Technology Center, Group for Advanced Information Technology, Oct. 1998
  17. Ji Young Lim, Ki-Joon Chae, ' Differentiated Link based QoS Routing Algorithms for Multimedia Traffic in MPLS Networks,' 15th International Conference on Information Networking(ICOIN-15), Japan, pp.587-592, Feb. 2001 https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOIN.2001.905515
  18. J. Moy, 'OSPF Version 2,' RFC 2328, Apr. 1998
  19. A. Shaikh, J. Rexford, K. Shin, 'Load-Sensitive Routing of Long-Lived IF Flows,' ACM SIGCOMM, pp.215-226, Sep. 1999 https://doi.org/10.1145/316188.316225