The Perceptions and Needs Teachers, Principals and Educational Specialists on the Curriculum Implementation of Technology and Home Economics

"기술.가정" 교과 운영에 대한 교사, 학교장, 교육 전문직의 인식과 요구

  • 곽노선 (청주여자고등학교 교사) ;
  • 조재순 (한국교원대학교 가정교육과)
  • Published : 2002.07.01

Abstract

The goal of the study is to find the necessary measures to facilitate a desirable Technology and Home Economics curriculum by reflecting the perception and needs of the teachers, principals, educational specialists from the perspective of the curriculum content, professionalism of the teacher, realistic operations of the school, and the administration of the school system. The research was executed through mail surveys to nationwide junior high school technology teachers, home education leachers, principals and to educational specialists. The results obtained from the research are as follows. 1) The integration of Technology and Home Economics was perceived to lessen the burden of students. However the background knowledge and characteristics of the two curriculums are different, and in addition there is a negative perception due to the fact that it is hard to facilitate a class with just one teacher, 2) The issues that were most serious to teachers, principals and education specialists were professionalism of the teacher, qualification of the teachers, and teaching method. 3) In regards to qualifications of the teacher, the teachers requested that teachers should have single qualification in'Technology(or Home Economics)'. The principals were of the similar opinion but the educational professionals wanted dual qualification for both'Technology'and'Home Economics'. As for teaching methodology all 3 groups responded that from the teacher and student perspective the teaching should be divided whereas from the school's perspective the responsibility should be put on a single teacher. 4) Teachers responded that from the perspective of the teacher, parent or student Technology and Home Economics should be separated into taro subjects. On the other hand the principals and educational specialists agreed that from their own perspective Technology and Home Economics should remain an integrated subject and the teaching should be done by one teacher but replied that from the student or parent perspective division of responsibility in teaching would be appropriate.

Keywords

References

  1. 강주석(1990). 초등학교 통합교육과정 운영에 관한 연구. 한국교원대학교대학원 석사학위논문
  2. 교육부(1999). 중학교 교육과정 해설(I), 2-183
  3. 교육부(1999). 중학교 교육과정 해설 (III), 193-254
  4. 김승수(1993). 중학교 기술.가정 통합교과의 교육실태 분석과 개선 방안에 관한 연구. 경희대학교대학원 석사학위논문
  5. 김인경(1992). 남녀 중학생의 기술.가정 통합교과내용에 관한 인식도 차이에 관한 연구. 연세대학교대학원 석사학위논문
  6. 김지숙(1991). 중학교 기술.가정 교과의 내용과 운영에 관한 연구. 직업교육연구, 10(1), 49-58
  7. 박인애(1991). 기술.가정 통합교과 내용 구성에 대한 인식도 조사. 연세대학교대학원 석사학위논문
  8. 백일순(1992). 중학교 기술.가정교과 통합에 따른 남.녀 학생들의 학습결과비교에 대한 연구. 성신여자대학교대학원 석사학위논문
  9. 전현주(1991). 중학교 기술.가정교과 교육내용의 통합적 접근에 관한 연구. 한국교원대학교대학원 석사학위논문
  10. 金子 政彦(1997). 技術敎育.家處科敎育を取り卷く狀況. 盧業敎育硏究聯盟, 14-18
  11. 永島 利明(1997). 技術.理科併合論批判. 産業敎育硏究聯盟, 76-85
  12. 石井 良子(1997). 中學校技術.家處科の現狀を考る. 産業敎育硏究聯盟, 19-26