DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Exploratory Study of Cooperative Relationship and Influencing Factors of Cooperating Performance in Interhospital Cooperative Relationship

협력병원간 협력내용과 성과의 영향요인에 대한 탐색적 연구

  • 김광점 (가톨릭대학교 의료경영대학원) ;
  • 김인수 (고려대학교 경영대학)
  • Published : 2002.06.01

Abstract

Many tertiary hospitals have started to establish cooperative relationships with small and medium sized hospitals in Korea. But the performance of the relationship is not satisfactory to both of partners. The relationship and performance of cooperation for small and medium sized hospitals are analyzed according to the framework of inter-organizational cooperation. Data are collected by 4 focal hospital and 34 small and medium sized hospitals through interview and questionnaire. The findings are : a) The cooperation is focused on management area, such as healthcare technology transfer and information sharing, rather than patient referral. b) Patient referral is not yet active in cooperative relationship. But some partner hospitals which is located close and managing internal organization for cooperation show a significant number of referrals. c) The characteristics of high performers are positive attitude about cooperation, and recognition of the relationship as flexible, experiences of cooperation, internal and external management activities.

Keywords

References

  1. 오하영. 의료기관간 연계와 네트워크 운영. 대한병원협회지 2000; 29(5): 4-12
  2. 윤경일, 정우진, 임영택, 정일건. 병원간 협력의 활성화를 통한 운영효율화 제고방안. 한국보건사회연구원. 1999
  3. Cohen WM. Levinthal DA. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 1990; 35: 128-152 https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
  4. Dyer JH, Singh H. The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review 1998; 23: 660-679 https://doi.org/10.2307/259056
  5. Granovetter M. Problems of explanation in economic sociology. in Nohria N and Eccles RG(eds.), Networks and Organizations: structure, form, and action. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press, 1992: 25-56
  6. Gulati R. Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Academy of Management Journal 1995; 38: 85-112 https://doi.org/10.2307/256729
  7. Gulati R. Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal 1998; 19: 293-317 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199804)19:4<293::AID-SMJ982>3.0.CO;2-M
  8. Heide JB, Miner AS. The shadow of the future: Effects of anticipated interaction and frequency of contact on buyer-seller cooperation. Academy of Management Journal 1992; 35: 265-291 https://doi.org/10.2307/256374
  9. Hoffmann WH, Schlosser R. Success factors of strategic alliances in small and medium-sized enterprises- an empirical survey. Long Range Planning 200l; 34: 357-381 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(01)00041-3
  10. Human SE, Provan KG. An emergent theory of structure and outcomes in small firm strategic manufacturing networks. Academy of Management Journal 1997; 40: 368-403 https://doi.org/10.2307/256887
  11. Iarillo JC. On strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal 1988; 9: 31-41 https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250090104
  12. Jarillo JC. Strategic Networks: Creating the Borderless Organization. Butterworth-Heinemann, 1993
  13. Koza MP, Lewin AY. The co-evolution of strategic alliances. Organization Sceince 1998; 9: 255-264 https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.9.3.255
  14. Kumar R, Nti KO. Differential learning and interaction in alliance dynamics: a process and outcome discrepancy model. Organization Science 1998; 9: 356-367 https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.9.3.356
  15. Luke RD, Begun JW, Pointer DD. Quasi firms: Strategic inter-organizational forms in the health care industry. Academy of Management Review 1989; 14: 9-19 https://doi.org/10.2307/258188
  16. Madhok A, Tallman SB. Resources, transactions and rents: Managing value through interfirm collaborative relationships. Organization Science 1998; 9: 326-339 https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.9.3.326
  17. Milgrom P, Roberts J Economics, Organization and Management. Prentice-Hall, 1992 : 28-32
  18. Nooteboom B, Berger H, Noorderhaven NG. Effects of trust and governance on relational risk. Academy of Management Journal 1997; 40: 308-338 https://doi.org/10.2307/256885
  19. Oliver C, Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and resource based views. Strategic Management Journal 1997; 18: 697-713 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199710)18:9<697::AID-SMJ909>3.0.CO;2-C
  20. Parkhe A. Strategic alliance structuring: A game theoretic and transaction cost examination of interfirm coordination. Academy of Management Journal 1993; 36: 794-829 https://doi.org/10.2307/256759
  21. Provan KG. Technology and interorganizational activity as predictors of client referrals. Academy of Management Review 1984; 27: 811-829 https://doi.org/10.2307/255880
  22. Thorelli HB. Networks: Between markets and hierarchies. Strategic Management Journal 1986; 7: 37-51 https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250070105
  23. Williamson OE. Calculativeness, trust, and economic organization. Journal of Law and Economics 1993; 36: 453-86 https://doi.org/10.1086/467284
  24. Zajac EJ, D'Aunno TA. Managing strategic alliances. in Shortell SM, Kaluzny AD, Essentials of Health Care Management. Delmar Publishers, 1997
  25. Zuckerman K, Ricketts III. Alliances in health care: What we know, what we think we know, and what we should know. Health Care Management Review 1995; 20(1): 54-64 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004010-199502010-00007