Effect of Covering Methods with Ventilating Non-Woven Fabric on the Growth and Yield in Leaf Lettuce during Low Temperature Season

통기성 간이 피복재의 피복방법이 저온기에 잎상추의 생육, 수량 및 품질에 미치는 영향

  • Published : 2002.06.01

Abstract

The study was conducted to estimate stimulation of plant growth of blue and red leaf lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) as affected by covering methods with vinyl materials containing concentrated PO film. Plants were grown in direct, direct and tunnel, and tunnel covering with 'Pasraido materials' from October 13 to 31. With the covering mean air temperature, soil temperature, leaf temperature and relative humidity remarkedly increased. Higher temperature was observed in the order of direct and tunnel, direct, tunnel covering and the control. Photosynthetic photon flux (PPF, $\mu$mol m$^{-2}$ . s$^{-1}$ ) was observed in reverse order of temperature. Concentration of $CO_2$ was higher during night than during day under the light. Accumulation of highest $CO_2$ at night was obtained from direct coverings followed by direct and tunnel, tunnel covering and the control. Plant height, leaf number and leaf area of blue and red lettuces were stimulated by direct covering. However, there was no significant difference.

저온기에 통기성 간이 피복재의 피복방법에 의한 보온환경이 잎상추의 생육촉진에 미치는 영향을 구명하기 위하여 농PO계 필름하우스내에서 '파스라이도' 피복재를 이용하여 직접피복, 터널피복 및 직접+터널피복 처리구 하에서 10월 13일부터 10월 31일가지 18일간 청상추와 적상추를 재배하여 그 효과를 검토하였다. 평균기온, 지온, 엽온과 상대습도는 피복의 효과가 현저하여, 직접+터널, 직접피복, 터널피복 및 대조구의 순으로 높았으며, 광합성유효광량자속은 역순위였다. $CO_2$의 농도는 주간보다 야간에 현저히 증가하였는데, 직접피복에서 가장 높았으며, 다음은 직접+터널피복, 터널피복, 대조구의 순으로 높았으나 그 차이는 매우 낮았다. 청상추와 적상추의 초장, 엽수 및 엽면적 등은 직접+터널, 직접피복, 터널피복의 순으로 촉진되었으나 통계적인 유의차는 없었다.

Keywords

References

  1. 안종길, 조동, 손병구, 최영환, 강점순. 1999. '막 덮 기 피복재'가 결구상치의 생육,수량 및 품질에 미치는 영향. 密陽大學校 農技硏報. 3:29-32
  2. Gaye,M.M.andA.R.Hauler. 1991.Modifiedtrans-plant production techniques to increaseyield and improve earliness of brussels sprouts. J. Amer.Soc. Hort.Sci.116:210-214
  3. 演本浩, 中村沿. 1988.通氣性資材を用いた秋まきホ ウレンソウ栽培における被覆時期の影響. 園學要旨. 昭 63秋(野業):330-337
  4. 演本浩. 1991.數種のべたがけ下における夜間の葉溫. 農業氣象. 46(4):229-232
  5. 濱本 浩. 1992. べたがけ下の環業境がホウレンソウの生育におよほす影響. 農業氣象. 48(3):247-255
  6. Hemphill, D.D. Jr. and N.S. Mansour. 1986. Response of muskmelon tothree floatingrowcovers. J. Amer.Soc.Hort.Sci.111:513-517
  7. 是兼孝-, 椙垣 昇, 前川進 1991.不織布彼覆下にお けろホウレンソウおよびコマツナの生育ならびに栽培 環境. 園學雜 60(2):352-353
  8. Milford, G.F.J., T.O. Pocock, and J. Riley. 1985. An analysis of leaf growth in sugar beet. 1. Leaf appear-ance and expansion in relation to temperature under controlled conditions. Ann. Appl. Biol. 106:163-172 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1985.tb03106.x
  9. 中原光久.2001.,照明時間, 光景子速密度춻びCO$_2$濃度 がサラダナの生育に及(ほす影響.園學雜. 70(1):122
  10. 日本施設園藝協會. 1987. 施設園藝におけるべたがけ 資材導入の手引(素):p.7-50
  11. 岡田盜己, 五十嵐大浴. 1987. べたがけ下の環境と作物生育の特徵. 1987年度日本農業氣象學會全國大會講演要旨.234-235
  12. 岡安 正, 高橋俊夫. 1985. 野業のべたがけ索試騎 4) ダイコン栽培に對するべたがけ效果の檢討(12月まで). そ荣園藝試驗成績書:76-80
  13. Paul, E.M.M. 1984. The respoilse to temPerature of ieaf area in tomato genotypes.2. Therate of leaf pro-duction. Euphytica 33:355-362 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00021132
  14. 高山 覺. 1987. べたがけ栽培と軟弱野荣の生育. べた がけ がけの現狀と考察(制1報). 日本農業氣象學會, 施設園藝 硏究部會:16-23
  15. 野荣試驗場. 1987. 春期における葉菜類のべたがけ栽培 野試硏究報告書:143-152
  16. Yoshida, Y., M. Yoshihiro, and K. Yokoyama. 1997. Soil organic substances positively affect carbon dioxide environment in greenhouse and yield in strawberry. J. Japan. Soc. Hort. Sci. 65(4):791-799 https://doi.org/10.2503/jjshs.65.791