Analysis of Spatial Coincidence of Thrips and Orius sauteri on Greenhouse Eggplants

하우스가지에서 애꽃노린재 Orius sauteri Poppius를 이용한 총채벌레류 방제 및 두 개체군의 공간분포와 공존분석

  • 송정흡 (제주도농업기술원 농업환경과) ;
  • 김수남 (제주도농업기술원 농업환경과) ;
  • 이광석 (제주도농업기술원 농업환경과) ;
  • 한원탁 (제주도농업기술원 농업환경과)
  • Published : 2002.03.01

Abstract

Biological control of thrips with a predatory bug species, Orius sauteri Poppius, was evaluated in an eggplant greenhouse, To study the biological control strategy of thrips. three Plots were established: Orius sauteri released plot without pesticide treatment (NRT), pesticide treated plot (PAT), and natural enemy removed plot (RNT) The nymphs of O. sauteri were found on the upper side of leaves in NRT at 21 days after the first release of O. sauteri. The density of thrips were dropped and maintained at lower level in NRT than in RNT. Average damage index of NRT, PAT and RNT was 1.35, 1.21 and 2.90 and the percentage of damaged fruit ratio of those was 70.3, 68.6 and 99.0%, respectively. The damage index and percentage of damaged fruit in NRT were slightly higher than those of PAT, but much lower than in RNT. Taylor's band Iwao's $\beta$ were greater than 1 for both populations. indicating aggregated distribution. Spatial coincidence index of O. sauteri was high most of the time even at low densities of both populations. The refuge index for thrips decreased as O. sauteri density increased. Results of this study suggest that O. sauteri is a promising natural enemy for thrips control on eggplant.

애꽃노린재를 이용한 총채벌레의 방제효과를 구명하기 위하여 하우스 가지에서 천적방사구(NRT), 농약살포구(PAT)와 천적제거구(RNT)의 세처리를 하여 처리구별 총채벌레와 애꽃노린재의 밀도변동 및 가지 열매의 피해고 조사를 실시하였다. NRT에서 애꽃노린재의 약충은 최초방사후 21일부터 상위엽에서 조사되었으며. 총채벌레의 밀도는 정식 42일 후부터 낮아지기 시작하여 RNT보다 매우 낮은 밀도로 유지되었다. NRT, PAT와 RNT에서 가지 열매의 피해도 지수는 각각 1.35. 1.21과 2.90이었으며. 피해과율은 각각 70.3,78.6 99.0%로 NRT의 피해도 지수와 피해과율은 PAT보다는 높았으나, RNT에 비해서는 낮았다. 총채벌레와 애꽃노린재의 공간분포 양상은 Tailor의 b와 Iwao의 $\beta$값이 모두 1보다 커 집중분포를 하는 것으로 나타났다. 애꽃노린재의 공존지수는 총채벌레와 애꽃노린재의 밀도에 관계없이 매우 높았으며, 총채벌레의 도피지수는 애꽃노린재의 밀도에 따라 변동하였다. 본 연구 결과 하우스가지에서 총채벌레를 방제하는데 천적으로 애꽃노린재를 이용할 수 있을 것으로 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Coll, M., L.A. Smith and R.L. Ridgway.1997. Effect of plantson the searching efficiency of a generalist predator: theimportance of predator-prey spatial Exp.App1.83: 1-10 association. Entomol. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002928225187
  2. Greco, N.M., G.G. Liljesthr$\ddot{o}$m and N.E. S$\dot{a}$nchez. 1999. Spatialdistribution and coincidence of Neoseiutus californicus andTetranychus urticae (Acari: Phytoseiidae, Tetranychidae) onstrawberry. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 23: 567-580 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006125103981
  3. Griffiths, K.J. 1969. The importance of coincidence in the functional responses of two parasites of the european pine sawfly,Neodiprion sertifer. Can. Ent. 101: 673-713 https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent101673-7
  4. Han, MJ., I.S. Kirn, S.B. Ahn, M.L. Lee and KJ. Hong. 1998.Distribution and host plants of recently introduced westernflower thrips, FranktinieIIa occidentatis (Pergande) (Thy-sanoptera: Thripidae) in Korea. RDA. J. Crop Protec. 40: 83-88
  5. Hong, KJ., M.L. Lee, MJ. Han, S.B. Ahn, I.S. Kim. G.H. Leeand D.S. Ku. 1998. Distribution and host plants of recentlyintroduced palm thrips, Thrips patmi Karny (Thysanoptera:Thripidae) in Korea. RDA. J. Crop Protec. 40: 89-95
  6. Huffaker, C.B., R.F. Luck and P.S. Messenger. 1976. The ecological basis of biological control, In Proceedings of the 15thInternational Congress of Entomology, ed. by D. White,Washington D.C., pp. 560-586
  7. Iwao, S. 1968. A new regression method for analysing the aggregation pattern of animal populations. Res. Popul. Ecol. 10:1-20 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02514729
  8. Kim, J.H., G.S. Lee, Y.H. Kim and J.K. Yoo. 2001 Speciescomposition of Orius spp. (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) andtheir seasonal occurrence on several plants in Korea. Korean J.Appl Entomol. 40:211-217
  9. Lloyd, M. 1967. Mean crowding. J. Anim. Ecol. 36: 1-30 https://doi.org/10.2307/3012
  10. Ohno, K., H. Takemoto, K. Kawano and K. Hayashi. 1995.Effectiveness of integrated pest control program for Thripspatmi Karny on eggplants: a case study in a commercial field.Bull.Fukuoka Agric. Res. Cent. 14: 104-109
  11. Ramakers, P.M.J. and van Lieburg, M.J. 1982. Start of commercial production and introduction of Ambtyseius mckenyeiSch. & Pr. (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) for the control of Thripstabaci Lind. (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in glasshouses. Med.Fac. Landbouw. Rijksuniv. cent. 47: 541-545
  12. Sabelis, M.W. and van P.C.J. Rijn. 1997. Predation by insectsand mites, pp. 259-354. In Thrips as Crop Pests, CAB International, ed. by T. Lewis, Wallingford, Oxon
  13. Sokal, R.R. and F.J. Rohlf. 1995. Biometry. W.H. Freeman,New York
  14. Song, J.H., S.H. Kang, S.Y. Hong, S.E. Lim and S.Y. Jeong.1998. Effects of Orius spp. on suppression of thrips density ina greenhouse eggplant. RDA. J. Crop Protec. 40: 71-75
  15. Song, J.H., S.H. Kang, K.S. Lee and W.T. Han. 2001. Effects ofminute piratebug, Orius stngicoltis (Hemiptera: Anthocori-dae) on control of thrips on hot pepper in greenhouse. KoreanJ. Appl. Entomol. 40: 253-258
  16. Taylor, L.R. 1961. Aggregation, variance and the mean. Nature189: 732-735 https://doi.org/10.1038/189732a0
  17. van Lenteren, J.C. and A.J.M. Loomans. 1998. Is there a naturalenemy good enough for biological control of thrips? BriahtonCrop Protec. Conf.: Pests and Disease 1998 vol. 2: Proc. Int.Conf. Brighton UK, 16-19: 401-408
  18. Woo, K.S. and H.Y. Choo. 1986. Distribution and control ofthrips on fruit and seasoning vegetables. Res. Rept. RDA.(Agri. Institutional Cooperation) pp. 163-167
  19. Yano, E. 1999. Recent advances in the study of biocontrol withindigenous natural enemies in Japan. Bull. I0BC/WPRSworking group on integrated control in glasshouses 22: 291-294