DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Investigation of Biases for Variance Components on Multiple Traits with Varying Number of Categories in Threshold Models Using Bayesian Inferences

  • Lee, D.H. (Department of Animal Life and Resources, Hankyong National University)
  • Received : 2001.09.13
  • Accepted : 2002.02.15
  • Published : 2002.07.01

Abstract

Gibbs sampling algorithms were implemented to the multi-trait threshold animal models with any combinations of multiple binary, ordered categorical, and linear traits and investigate the amount of bias on these models with two kinds of parameterization and algorithms for generating underlying liabilities. Statistical models which included additive genetic and residual effects as random and contemporary group effects as fixed were considered on the models using simulated data. The fully conditional posterior means of heritabilities and genetic (residual) correlations were calculated from 1,000 samples retained every 10th samples after 15,000 samples discarded as "burn-in" period. Under the models considered, several combinations of three traits with binary, multiple ordered categories, and continuous were analyzed. Five replicates were carried out. Estimates for heritabilities and genetic (residual) correlations as the posterior means were unbiased when underlying liabilities for a categorical trait were generated given by underlying liabilities of the other traits and threshold estimates were rescaled. Otherwise, when parameterizing threshold of zero and residual variance of one for binary traits, heritability estimates were inflated 7-10% upward. Genetic correlation estimates were biased upward if positively correlated and downward if negatively correlated when underling liabilities were generated without accounting for correlated traits on prior information. Residual correlation estimates were, consequently, much biased downward if positively correlated and upward if negatively correlated in that case. The more categorical trait had categories, the better mixing rate was shown.

Keywords

References

  1. Foulley, J. L., D. Gianola and R. Thompson. 1983. Prediction of genetic merit from data on binary and quantitative variates with an application to calving difficulty, birth weight and pelvic opening. Genet. Sel. Evol. 15:401-424. https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-15-3-401
  2. Gelman, A., J. B. Carlin, H. S. Stern and D. B. Robin. 1995. Bayesian data analysis. Chapman and Hall/CRC. pp. 52-57.
  3. Geman, S. and D. Geman. 1984. Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 6:721-741. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.1984.4767596
  4. Geyer, C. J. 1992. Practical Markov Chain Monte Carlo (with discussion). Stat. Sci. 7:467-511.
  5. Gianola, D. 1982. Theory and analysis of threshold characters. J. Anim. Sci. 54:1079-1096.
  6. Gianola, D. and R. L. Fernando. 1986. Bayesian methods in animal breeding theory. J. Anim. Sci. 63:217-244.
  7. Gianola, D. and J. L. Foulley. 1983. Sire evaluation for ordered categorical data with a threshold model. Genet. Sel. Evol. 15:201-244. https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-15-2-201
  8. Harville, D. A. and R. W. Mee. 1984. A mixed-model procedure for analyzing ordered categorical data. Biometrics. 40:393-408. https://doi.org/10.2307/2531393
  9. Hoeschele, I. and B. Tier. 1995. Estimation of variance components of threshold characters by marginal posterior modes and means via Gibbs sampling. Genet. Sel. Evol. 27:519-540. https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-27-6-519
  10. Korsgaard, I. R., A. H. Andersen and D. Sorensen. 1999. A useful reparameterisation to obtain samples from conditional inverse Wishart distributions. Genet. Sel. Evol. 31:177-181. https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-31-2-177
  11. Luo, M. F., P. J. Boettcher, L. R. Schaeffer and J. C. M. Dekkers. 2001. Bayesian inference for categorical traits with an application to variance component estimation. J. Dairy Sci. 84:694-704.
  12. Moreno, C., D. Sorensen, L. A. Garcia-Cortes, L. Varona and J. Altarriba. 1997. On biased inferences about variance components in the binary threshold model. Genet. Sel. Evol. 29:145-160. https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-29-2-145
  13. Sorensen, D. 1996. Gibbs sampling in quantitative genetics. Internal report no. 82. Danish institute of animal science. Denmark.
  14. Sorensen, D. A., S. Andersen, D. Gianola and I. Korsgaard. 1995. Bayesian inference in threshold models using Gibbs sampling. Genet. Sel. Evol. 27:229-249. https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-27-3-229
  15. VanTassell, C. P., L. D. Van Vleck and K. E. Gregory. 1998. Bayesian analysis of twinning and ovulation rates using a multiple-trait threshold model and Gibbs sampling. J. Anim. Sci. 76:2048-2061.
  16. Wang, C. S., R. L. Quaas and E. J. Pollak. 1997. Bayesian analysis of calving ease scores and birth weights. Genet. Sel. Evol. 29:117-143. https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-29-2-117
  17. Wright, S. 1934. An analysis of variability in number of digits in an inbred strain of guinea pigs. Genetics 19:506-536.

Cited by

  1. 범주형 자료를 포함한 다형질 임계개체모형에서 유전능력 추정 알고리즘 vol.46, pp.2, 2002, https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2004.46.2.137
  2. 한우의 도체중, 배장근단면적 및 근내지방도의 유전모수 추정방법 vol.46, pp.4, 2002, https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2004.46.4.509
  3. 한우 도체형질의 환경효과 및 유전모수의 추정 vol.49, pp.6, 2002, https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2007.49.6.689