DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Dietary Fructooligosaccharide on Digestive Enzyme Activities, Intestinal Microflora and Morphology of Growing Pigs

  • Xu, Z.R. (Animal Science College, Zhejiang University) ;
  • Zou, X.T. (The Key Laboratory of Molecular Animal Nutrition, Ministry of Education) ;
  • Hu, C.H. (Animal Science College, Zhejiang University) ;
  • Xia, M.S. (The Key Laboratory of Molecular Animal Nutrition, Ministry of Education) ;
  • Zhan, X.A. (Animal Science College, Zhejiang University) ;
  • Wang, M.Q. (The Key Laboratory of Molecular Animal Nutrition, Ministry of Education)
  • Received : 2002.04.01
  • Accepted : 2002.08.01
  • Published : 2002.12.01

Abstract

One hundred and twenty-eight growing barrows (Jiaxing Black${\times}$Duroc${\times}$Landrace) at an average BW of 20.8 kg were allocated to four treatments for 42 days, each of which was replicated four times with eight pigs per replicate and used to investigate the effects of fructooligosaccharide (FOS) on digestive enzyme activities, intestinal microflora and morphology of growing pigs. The pigs received the same basal corn-soybean meal diet and FOS was added to the basal diet at 0, 2, 4, 6 g/kg diet at the expense of corn, respectively. As compared to control, supplementation with 4 and 6 g/kg FOS significantly improved average daily gain and feed efficiency. Addition of FOS enhanced the growth of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus, but inhibited Clostridium and Escherichia coli in the small intestinal and proximal colonic contents. Supplementation with 4 and 6 g/kg FOS significantly improved the activities of total protease, trypsin and amylase in the small intestinal contents. However, FOS had no significant effect on the activity of lipase in the small intestinal contents as well as the digestive enzymes in pancreas. Morphological measurement of jejunal mucosa did show response to consumption of FOS. Villus height and the villus height to crypt depth ratio at the jejunal mucosa were significantly higher with 4 and 6 g/kg FOS supplementation as compared to control.

Keywords

References

  1. Anonymous. 1999. How do mannanoligosaccharides work. Feeding Times (1):7-9.
  2. Baily, J. S., L. C. Blankenship and N. A. Cox. 1991. Effect of fructooligosaccharide on Salmonella colonization of the chicken intestine. Poult. Sci. 70:2433-2438. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0702433
  3. Bolduan, G., M. Beck and C. Schubert. 1993. Zur Wirkung von Oligosacchariden beim Ferkel. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 44:21-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450399309386055
  4. Bryant, M. P. and I. M. Allison. 1961. An improved non-selective culture medium for animal bacterial and its use in determining diurnal variation in numbers of bacteria in the rumen. J. Dairy Sci. 44:1446-1453. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(61)89906-2
  5. Bryant, M. P. 1972. Commentary on the Hungate technique for culture for anaerobic bacteria. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 25:1324-1330.
  6. Bunce, T. J., M. D. Howard, G. L. Allee and L. W. Pace. 1995. Protective effects of fructooligosaccharide (FOS) in prevention of mortality and morbidity from infectious E.coli K: 88 challenge. J. Anim. Sci. 73(Suppl. 1):69(Abstr.). https://doi.org/10.2527/1995.73169x
  7. Conway, P. L. 1994. The function of the gastrointestinal microflora and its regulation. In: Proceeding of the 6th international seminar on digestive physiology of pig. Sicuan: Sicuan science and technology press. pp. 233-242 (in Chinese).
  8. Delzenne, N. M., N. Kok, M. F. Fiordaliso, D. M. Deboyser, F. M. Goethals and M. B. Roberfroid. 1993. Dietary fructooligosaccharides modify lipid metabolism in rats. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 57(Suppl.):820S(Abstr.).
  9. Erlanger, B. F., F. Edel and A. G. Cooper. 1966. The action of chymotrypsin on two new chromogenic substrates. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 115:206–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9861(66)81058-5
  10. Erlanger, B. F., N. Kokowsky and W. Cohen. 1961. The preparation and properties of two new chromogenic substrates of trypsin. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 95:271–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9861(61)90145-X
  11. Erlanson-Albertsson, C., A. Larsson and R. Duan. 1987. Secretion of pancreatic lipase and colipase from rat pancreas. Pancreas. 2:531-535. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006676-198709000-00007
  12. Farnworth, E. R., H. W. Molder, J. D. Jones, N. Cave, H. Yamazaki and A. V. Rao. 1992. Feeding Jerusalem artichoke flour rich in fructo-oligosaccharides to weanling pigs. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 72:977-980. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas92-112
  13. Fukuyasu, T., T. Oshida and K. Ashida. 1987. Effects of oligosaccharides on growth of piglets and on bacteria flora, putrefactive substances and volatile fatty acids in their feces. Bulletin of Anim. Hygience 26:15-22.
  14. Gao, L. S. (ed.). 1998. Digestive physiology and health protection, 1th edn. Beijing: China curatorial science and technology press. pp. 173-230 (in Chinese).
  15. Gibson, G. R. and X. Wang. 1994. Bifidogenic properties of different types of fructooligosaccharides. Food Microbiol. 11:491-498. https://doi.org/10.1006/fmic.1994.1055
  16. Hidaka, H., T. Eida and T. Hamaya. 1986a. Livestock feed containing inulo- oligosaccharides and breeding of livestock by using the same. Eur. Pat. Appl. 017026A2:10.
  17. Hidaka, H., T. Eida, T. Tokunaga and Y. Tashiro. 1986b. Effects of fructooligosaccharides on intestinal flora and human health. Bifidobact. Microflora 5:37-50. https://doi.org/10.12938/bifidus1982.5.1_37
  18. Hidaka, H., Y. Tashiro and T. Eida. 1991. Proliferation of bifidobacteria by oligosaccharides and their useful effect on human health. Bifidobact. Microflora 10:65-79. https://doi.org/10.12938/bifidus1982.10.1_65
  19. Holdeman, L. V., E. P. Cato and W. E. C. Moore (ed.). 1977. Anaerobic laboratory mannual, 4th edn. Blacksburg: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
  20. Howard, M. D., D. T. Gordon, L. W. Pace, K. A. Garleb and M. S. Kerley. 1995. Effects of dietary supplementation with fructooligosaccharides on colonic microbiota populations and epithelial cell prolifertion in neonatal pigs. J. Gastroenterology Nutr. 21:297-303. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005176-199510000-00007
  21. Ikegami, S., F. Tsuchihashi, H. Harada, N. Tsuchihashi, E. Nishidt and S. Innami. 1990. Effects of viscous indigestible polysaccharides on pancreatic-biliary secretion and digestive organs in rats. J. Nutr. 120:353-360.
  22. Jensen, M. S., K. E. Bach Knudsen, J. Inborr and K. Jakobsen. 1998. Effect of $\beta$-glucanase supplementation on pancreatic enzyme activity and nutrient digestibility in piglets fed diets based on hulled and hulless barley varieties. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 72:329-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(97)00187-9
  23. Kim, M. and H. K. Shin. 1998. The water soluble extract of chicory influences serum and liver lipid concentrations, cecal short-chain fatty acid concentrations and fecal lipid excretion in rats. J. Nutr. 128:1731-1736.
  24. Kornegay, E. T., C. M. Wood and L. A. Eng. 1992. Effectiveness and safety of fructooligosaccharides for pigs. Anim. Sci. Res. Report Virginia Agr. Exp. Station 10:19-20.
  25. Lynn, K. R. and N. A. Clevette-Radford. 1984. Purification and characterization of hevin, a serin protease from Hevea brazilliensis. Biochemistry 23:963-964.
  26. Mevissen-Verhage, E .A .E., J. H. Marcelis, N. M. de Vos and J. Verhoef. 1987. Bifidobacterium, Bacteroides and Clostridium spp. in faecal samples from breast-fed and bottle-fed infants with and without iron supplement. J. Clin. Microbiol. 25:285-289.
  27. Munoa, F. J. and R. Pares. 1988. Selective medium for the isolation and enumeration of Bifidobacterium spp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 54:1715-1718.
  28. National Research Council. 1998. Nutrient requirements of swine. I0th Ed. National Academy Press. Washington, DC.
  29. Roberfroid, M. B., J. A. E. Vanloo and G. R. Gibson. 1998. The bifidogenic nature of chicory inulin and its hydrolysis products. J. Nutr. 128:11-19.
  30. SAS. Institute Inc. 1989. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina.
  31. Sissons, J. W. 1989. Potential of probiotic organisms to prevent diarrhea and promote digestion in farm animals: a review. J. Sci. Food Agric. 49:1-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740490102
  32. Tokunaga, T., T. Oku and N. Hosoya. 1989. Utilization and excretion of a new sweetener, fructooligosaccharide in rats. J. Nutr. 119:553-559.
  33. Xu, Z. R., C. H. Hu and M. Q. Wang. 2002. Effects of fructooligosaccharide on conversion of L-tryptophan to skatole and indole by mixed populations of pig fecal bacteria. J. Gen. Appl. Microbial. 48:83-89. https://doi.org/10.2323/jgam.48.83
  34. Yason, C. V., B. A. Summers and K. A. Schat. 1987. Pathogenesis of rotavirus infection in various age groups of chickens and turkeys: pathology. Am. J. Vet. Res. 6:927-938
  35. Zhan, C. 1998. The action of decreasing cholesterol of Bifidobacterium: precipitation and assimilation with biliary salt. Medicine in abroad: antibiotic. 19:146-149 (in Chinese).

Cited by

  1. Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: updating the concept of prebiotics vol.17, pp.02, 2004, https://doi.org/10.1079/NRR200479
  2. Influence of dietary components on development of the microbiota in single-stomached species vol.19, pp.01, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1079/NRR2006123
  3. Effects of dietary neutral detergent fibre on production performance, nutrient utilization, caecum fermentation and fibrolytic activity in 2- to 3-month-old New Zealand rabbits vol.90, pp.11-12, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396.2006.00628.x
  4. Effects of a glucooligosaccharide supplement on the morphological characteristics of the gastro-intestinal tract and growth performance in weaned piglets vol.7, pp.2, 2008, https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2008.185
  5. Prebiotics in aquaculture: a review vol.16, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2095.2009.00731.x
  6. Inulin and probiotics in newly weaned piglets: effects on intestinal morphology, mRNA expression levels of inflammatory marker genes and haematology vol.64, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1080/1745039X.2010.492137
  7. Selenomethionine: an Effective Selenium Source for Sow to Improve Se Distribution, Antioxidant Status, and Growth Performance of Pig Offspring vol.142, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-010-8817-8
  8. Effects of Dietary Fiber on the Feline Gastrointestinal Metagenome pp.1535-3907, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1021/pr3006809
  9. The effects of prebiotics on the digestive enzymes and gut histomorphology of red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) and hybrid striped bass (Morone chrysops× M. saxatilis) vol.109, pp.04, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114512001754
  10. Administration of Bacillus Amyloliquefaciens and Saccharomyces Cerevisiae as Direct-Fed Microbials Improves Intestinal Microflora and Morphology in Broiler Chickens vol.54, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.0160069
  11. Supplementation of protease, alone and in combination with fructooligosaccharide to low protein diet for finishing pigs vol.88, pp.12, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12849
  12. Effects of levan-type fructan on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, diarrhoea scores, faecal shedding of total lactic acid bacteria and coliform bacteria, and faecal gas emission in weaning pigs pp.00225142, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.8625
  13. Evaluation of dietary fructan supplementation on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, meat quality, fecal microbial flora, and fecal noxious gas emission in finishing pigs vol.91, pp.11, 2013, https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2012-5393
  14. Effect of antibiotics and synbiotic on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and faecal microbial shedding in growing-finishing pigs vol.46, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2018.1484359
  15. Effects of dietary soyabean meal, inulin and oxytetracycline on intestinal microbiota and epithelial cell stress, apoptosis and proliferation in the teleost Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) vol.97, pp.4, 2002, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007114507381397
  16. Differences in Microbial Activities of Faeces from Weaned and Unweaned Pigs in Relation to In vitro Fermentation of Different Sources of Inulin-type Oligofructose and Pig Feed Ingredients vol.20, pp.9, 2007, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2007.1444
  17. Influence of differing carbohydrate sources on l-tryptophan metabolism by porcine fecal microbiota studied in vitro vol.120, pp.1, 2002, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2008.04.014
  18. Effects of dietary levan-type fructan on growth performance, blood profiles, fecal noxious gas emissions, and litter performance in lactating sows vol.100, pp.2, 2002, https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2018-0160
  19. Plant origin prebiotics affect duodenal brush border membrane functionality and morphology, in vivo (Gallus Gallus) vol.12, pp.14, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1039/d1fo01159f