SEQUENTIAL METHOD FOR SETTING SURGICAL TREATMENT OBJECTIVES

Sequential Method for setting Surgical Treatment Objective STO수립을 위한 순차적 방법

  • Published : 2002.12.31

Abstract

The final goal for an orthognathic surgery is a functional and esthetic achievement based on occlusion theory. All the dental treatment should be done with the occlusion in mind, though, they tend to be ignored with no good reason. We cannot think of occlusion without temporomandibular joint because it is the first clue to define an occlusion. As normal occlusion comes from the central tendency of distribution of population, we can get it by examining the population that closely meet the criteria of ideal occlusion. To perform proper occlusal function and to maintain the stability after treatment, the case must be finished in normal occlusion closer to ideal one. Our aim is to achieve the ideal occlusal scheme like the mutually protected occlusion with the best masticatory efficiency and the stability. The facial esthetics are influened by culture, race and the time in which human live. While the occlusal function rarely changes as time goes by, esthetics tend to do from one country to another. Orthodontists and maxillofacial surgeons should have solid sets of treatment goals to achieve the best facial esthetics and the ideal occlusion dictated by the joint. Doing orthognathic surgery, two factors aforementioned should be taken into account to establish the Surgical Treatment Objectives(STO). The doctors who are planning orthognathic surgery need to have a very logical and systematic thought process to make STO. The author examined 28 selected beautiful Korean female adults with normal skeleton with normal occlusion and analyzed the hard and the soft tissue relationship into five parts : dentomaxillary relationship, intermaxillary relationship, posture to hard tissue relationship, facial balance, and posture to soft tissue relationship. This study presents a sequential flow of diagnosis and treatment planning especially for surgical patients and it also can be applied to the nonsurgical patients.

Keywords

References

  1. Steiner CC. Cephalometrics for you and me. Am J Ortho 1953; 30:729-755
  2. Downs WB. Analysis of the dento-facial profile. Angle Orthod 1956; 26:191-212
  3. Burstone CJ. The integumental profile. Am J orthod 1958;44:1-25 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9416(58)90178-7
  4. Burstone CJ. Lip posture and its significance in treatment planning. Am J Orthod 1967;53:262-284 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(67)90022-X
  5. Rickets RM. Cepahlometric synthesis. Am J Orthod 1960;46:647-673 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(60)90172-X
  6. Merrifield LL. Profile line as an aid in critically evaluating facial esthetics. Am J Orthod 1966;52:804-822 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(66)90250-8
  7. Andrews LF. The six keys to normal occlusion. Am J Orthod 1972; 62:296-309 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9416(72)90268-0
  8. Kim YH. Overbite depth indicator with particular reference to anterior overbite. Am J Orthod 1974;65:586-611 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(74)90255-3
  9. Ricketts RM. A four step method to distinguish orthodontic changes from natural growth. J Clin Orthod 1975;9:208-215, 218-228