Journal of the Korean Chemical Society (대한화학회지)

Korean Chemical Society (대한화학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Relationships among Students' Self-Regulation Strategy, Cognitive Conflict, and Conceptual Change in Learning Density

밀도 개념 학습에서 자기 조절 전략과 인지 갈등 및 개념 변화의 관계

  • Kang, Suk-Jin (Center for Educational Research, Seoul National University) ;
  • Shin, Sook-Hee (Department of Chemistry Education, Seoul National University) ;
  • Noh, Tae-Hee (Department of Chemistry Education, Seoul National University)
  • 강석진 (서울대학교 교육종합연구원) ;
  • 신숙희 (서울대학교 화학교육과) ;
  • 노태희 (서울대학교 화학교육과)
  • Published : 2002.02.20
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, students' responses to anomalous data in studying ‘density' were analyzed, and the relationships among trait/state self-regulation strategies, the degree of cognitive conflict, and conceptual change were examined. A trait self-regulation strategy test, a preconception test, and a test of response to anomalous data were administered to 352 eighth graders. Among them, 146 students whose preconceptions were consistent with the presented initial theory were selected. After they had read a scientific explanation, a state self-regulation test and a researcher-made conception test were administerd. There were no significant correlations among the subcategory scores of trait/state self-regulation strategies and the degree of cognitive conflict. The scores of the conception test were significantly correlated with those of trait planning, trait effort, state planning, state self-monitoring, and state effort. State effort was only a significant predictor on students' conceptual change.

본 연구는 밀도 개념 학습에서 학생들의 변칙 사례에 대한 반응을 분석하고, 특성 및 상태 자기 조절 전략과 인지 갈등 및 개념 변화의 관계를 조사하였다. 중학교 2학년 학생 352명을 대상으로 특성 자기 조절 전략 검사, 선개념 검사, 변칙 사례에 대한 반응 검사를 실시하여, 제시한 초기 이론과 일치하는 선개념을 가진 146명을 선택하였다. 학생들이 과학적 원리를 학습한 후 상태 자기 조절 전략 검사와 개념 검사를 실시하였다. 특성 및 상태 자기 조절 전략의 하위 범주 점수들과 인지 갈등 정도는 유의미한 상관이 없었다. 개념 검사 점수는 특성 계획, 특성 노력, 상태 계획, 상태 자기 점검, 상태 노력 점수와 유의미한 상관이 있었다. 상태 노력만이 개념 변화에 대한 유의미한 예언 변인이었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Dreyfus, A.; Jungwirth, E.; Eliovitch, R. Science Education1990, 74, 555. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730740506
  2. Tao, P.; Gunstone, R. F. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2000, 36, 859. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199909)36:7<859::AID-TEA7>3.0.CO;2-J
  3. 노태희; 임희연; 강석진 한국과학교육학회지 2000, 20, 288.
  4. 노태희; 임희연; 강석진 한국과학교육학회지 2000, 20, 634.
  5. 노태희; 임희연; 강석진 한국과학교육학회지 인쇄중.
  6. Chinn, C.; Brewer, W. F. Review of Educational Research 1993, 63, 1. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543063001001
  7. Chinn, C.; Brewer, W. F. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1998, 35, 623. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199808)35:6<623::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-O
  8. Chan, C.; Burtis, J.; Bereiter, C. Cognition & Instruction1997, 15, 1. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1501_1
  9. 노태희; 임희연; 강석진 한국과학교육학회지 1999, 19, 471.
  10. Cavallo, A. M. L. Journal of Research in Science Teaching1996, 33, 625. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199608)33:6<625::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-Q
  11. Lawson, A. E.; Alkhoury, S.; Benford, R.; Clark, B. R.;Falconer, K. A. Journal of Research in Science Teaching2000, 37, 996. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200011)37:9<996::AID-TEA8>3.0.CO;2-J
  12. Chin, C.; Brown, D. E. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2000, 37, 109. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200002)37:2<109::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-7
  13. 노태희; 장신호; 임희준 한국과학교육학회지 1998, 18, 173.
  14. 이경호 고등학생의 물리 개념변화에 미치는 인지갈등, 학습동기와 학습전략의 영향, 한국교원대학교 박사학위논문, 2000.
  15. Spielberger, C. D. Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory (Form Y); Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologist Press, 1983.
  16. Hong, E. Journal of Educational Research 1998, 91, 148. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220679809597536
  17. O’Neil, H. F.; Abedi, J. Journal of Educational Research 1996, 89, 234. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1996.9941208
  18. 강석진; 노태희 한국과학교육학회지 2000, 20, 250.
  19. O’Neil, H. F.; Herl. H. E. Report of a reliability and validity of a trait measure of self-regulation, Los Angeles: University of Califonia, National Center for Researchon Evaluation Standards, and Student Testing, 1999.
  20. Driver, R.; Asoko, H.; Leach, J.; Mortimer, E.; Scott, P.Educational Researcher 1994, 23, 5. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023002005
  21. Guzzetti, B. J.; Snyder, T. E.; Glass, G. V.; Gamas, W. S. Reading Research Quarterly 1993, 28, 117.
  22. Pintrich, P. R.; De Groot, E. Journal of Educational Psychology 1990, 82, 33. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
  23. Kosmicki, J. The effect of differential test instructions on mathematics achievement, effort, and worry of community college students; Unpublished doctoral dissertation: University of Southern Califonia, Los Angeles, 1993.
  24. Huang, D. The role of perceived parental attitude, effort and self-efficacy in the math achievement of high and low track high school students in Taiwan; Unpublished doctoral dissertation: University of Southern Califonia, LosAngeles, 1996.
  25. Hertzog, C.; Schaie, K. W. Child Development 1986, 58, 93. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130294
  26. Weinstein, C. E.; Mayer, R. E. Handbook of research on teaching; Wittrock M. C., Ed.; Macmillan: Newyork, 1986; p 315.
  27. Pintrich, P. R.; Schunk, D. H. Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications; Prentice Hall: New Jersey, 1996.
  28. Wang, S. The role of perceived beliefs in effort, self-efficacy, and task value on high school students’ effort and math achievement in Taiwan: Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern Califonia, Los Angeles, 1997.
  29. Zimmerman, B. J. Educational Psychologist 1995, 30, 217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3004_8

Cited by

  1. 변칙사례 및 대안가설에 의해 유발된 인지갈등과 비인지적 변인이 개념변화에 미치는 영향 vol.51, pp.1, 2002, https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2007.51.1.056