Current Status and Reasons for the Location Change of Primary Medical Institutions in Korea

일차의료기관의 이동 현황과 이에 영향을 미치는 요인에 대한 연구

  • Shin, Soon-Ae (Social Security Research Center, National Health Insurance Corporation) ;
  • Lee, Jin-Seok (Department of Health Policy and Management, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Chang-Yup (Department of Health Policy and Management, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Yong-Ik (Department of Health Policy and Management, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Ha, Beom-Man (Department of Health Policy and Management, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
  • 신순애 (국민건강보험공단 사회보장연구센터) ;
  • 이진석 (서울대학교 의과대학 의료관리학교실) ;
  • 김창엽 (서울대학교 의과대학 의료관리학교실) ;
  • 김용익 (서울대학교 의과대학 의료관리학교실) ;
  • 하범만 (서울대학교 의과대학 의료관리학교실)
  • Published : 2001.09.01

Abstract

Objectives : To understand the current status of the opening, closing and relocation of primary medical institutes in Korea and identify the underlying decision factors. Methods : Sources of analyzed data included the medical institutional master file at the National Health Insurance Corporation(1998, 2000) and Regional Statistic Annual Bulletins. To investigate changes including the opening, closing and relocation, a total of primary medicalinstitutions(16,757 in 1998, 19,267 in 2000) were analysed. Results : Between 1998 and 2000, there was a 15.0%(2,510) increase in the number of primary medical institutions and the rate of increase in the rural area was higher than the urban area, and higher for specialty clinics than primary practice. However, these findings did not suggestany improvement in the maldistribution of primary medical institutions. During the time period studied, newly opened and closed primary medical institutions numbered 4,085 and 1,573, respectively. Additionally, institutions thatrelocated numbered 2,729, or 16.3% of all primary medical institutions in operation in 1998. These openings and closings were more frequent among young doctors. As a result of our analysis on the underlying regional factors forrelocation, the factors that were statistically significant were local per capita tax burden and the number of schools per ten thousand persons. !n, the case of institutional factors, movements were significantly associated with gender and the location of primary medical institutions. Conclusions : In order to establish effective long-term intervention for primary medical institutions, further study and monitoring of primary medical institutions and the identification of factors influencing opening location and relocation is necessary.

Keywords