The Effect of Demineralized Freeze - Dried Bone Allograft in Guided Bone Regeneration on Supra - Alveolar Peri - Implant Defects in Dogs

성견의 치조 연상 임플란트주위 결손부에서의 탈회냉동건조골과 e-PTEE막의 효과

  • Kim, Chang-Sung (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration) ;
  • Choi, Seong-Ho (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration) ;
  • Cho, Kyoo-Sung (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration)
  • 김창성 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직 재생 연구소) ;
  • 최성호 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직 재생 연구소) ;
  • 조규성 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직 재생 연구소)
  • Published : 2001.03.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the adjunctive combined effect of demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft(DFDB) in guided bone regeneration on supra-alveo-lar peri-implant defect. Supra-alveolar perio-implant defects, 3mm in height, each including 4 IMZ titanium plasma-sprayed implants were surgically created in two mongrel dogs. Subsequently, the defects were treated with 1 of the following 3 modalities: Control) no membrane or graft application, Group1) DFDB application, Group2) guided bone regeneration using an expanded polytetra-fluoroethylene membrane, Group3) guided bone regeneration using membrane and DFDB. After a healing period of 12-week, the animals were sacrificed, tissue blocks were harvested and prepared for histological analysis. Histologic examination were as follows; 1. New bon formation was minimal in control and Group 1, but considerable new bone formation was observed in Group 2 and Group 3. 2. There was no osteointegration at the implant-bone interface in the high-polished area of group2 and Group 3. 3. In fluorescent microscopic examination, remodeling of new bone was most active during week 4 and week 8. There was no significant difference in remodeling rate between group 2 and group 3. 4. DFDB particles were observed, invested in a connective tissue matrix. Osteoblast activity in the area was minimal. The results suggest that guided bone regeneration shows promising results in supra-alveolar peri-implant defects during the 12 week healing period although it has a limited potential in promoting alveolar bone regeneration in the high-polished area. There seems to be no significant adjunctive effect when DFDB is combined with GBR.

Keywords