Structural Engineering and Mechanics

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Investigation of dynamic P-Δ effect on ductility factor

  • Han, Sang Whan (Department of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University) ;
  • Kwon, Oh-Sung (Department of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University) ;
  • Lee, Li-Hyung (Department of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University)
  • Published : 2001.09.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Current seismic design provisions allow structures to deform into inelastic range during design level earthquakes since the chance to meet such event is quite rare. For this purpose, design base shear is defined in current seismic design provisions as the value of elastic seismic shear force divided by strength reduction factor, R (${\geq}1$). Strength reduction factor generally consists of four different factors, which can account for ductility capacity, overstrength, damping, and redundancy inherent in structures respectively. In this study, R factor is assumed to account for only the ductility rather than overstrength, damping, and redundancy. The R factor considering ductility is called "ductility factor" ($R_{\mu}$). This study proposes ductility factor with correction factor, C, which can account for dynamic P-${\Delta}$ effect. Correction factor, C is established as the functional form since it requires computational efforts and time for calculating this factor. From the statistical study using the results of nonlinear dynamic analysis for 40 earthquake ground motions (EQGM) it is shown that the dependence of C factor on structural period is weak, whereas C factor is strongly dependant on the change of ductility ratio and stability coefficient. To propose the functional form of C factor statistical study is carried out using 79,920 nonlinear dynamic analysis results for different combination of parameters and 40 EQGM.

Keywords

References

  1. AIK (2000), Building Design Loads and Commentary, Architectural Institute of Korea.
  2. ATC-19 (1995), Structural Response Modification Factors, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California.
  3. ATC-34 (1995), A Critical Review of Current Approaches to Earthquake-Resistant Design, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California.
  4. Bernal, D. (1987), "Amplification factors for inelastic dynamic P-delta effects in earthquake analysis," Earthq. Eng. and Struct. Dyn., 15.
  5. Bertero, V.V., Uang, C.M., and Whittaker, A.S. (1988), "Earthquake simulator testing of a concentrically braced steel structure," Proc. of 9th World Conf. on Earthq. Eng., Tokyo-Kyoto, Japan, 8.
  6. FEMA 302 (1997), NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings, 1997 edn., Federal Emergency Management Agency.
  7. FEMA 303 (1997), NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings, Part 2 - Commentary, 1997 edn., Federal Emergency Management Agency.
  8. Gupta, A., and Krawinkler, H. (2000), "Dynamic P-delta effects for flexible inelastic steel structures," J. Struct. Eng., 126(1), 145-154. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:1(145)
  9. Han, S.W., OH, Y.H., Lee, and L.H. (1998), "Effect of hystretic model on ductility-based strength reduction factor", Workshop on Structural Design Issues for Moderate Seismic Zone, Urbana, Illinois, February.
  10. Husid, R. (1969), "The effect of gravity on the collapse of yielding structures with earthquake excitation," Proc. of 4th world Conf. on Earthq. Eng., Chile, Vol. II, 1969, pages A4-31 to A4-43.
  11. Kilic, S.A., and Krawinkler, H. (1998), "P-delta effects in portal frames," Proc. of the 11th European Conf. on Earthq. Eng. (Online Version), A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam.
  12. Krawinkler, H. (1995), "New trends in seismic design methodology," Proc. of 10th European Conf. on Earthq. Eng., Duma.
  13. Lee, L.H., Han, S.W., and Oh, Y.H. (1999), "Determination of ductility factor considering different hysteretic models," J. Earthq. Eng. and Struct. Dyn., 28, 957-977. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199909)28:9<957::AID-EQE849>3.0.CO;2-K
  14. MacRae, G.A. (1994), "P-delta effects on single-degree-of-freedom structures in earthquakes." Earthq. Spect., 10(3), 539-568. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585788
  15. Mahin, S.A., and Boroschek, R.L. (1992), "Influence of geometric nonlinearities on the seismic response of bridge structures," Proc. of 3rd Workshop on Bridge Engineering Research in Progress, University of California, San Diego, 211-214.
  16. Miranda (1993), "Site-dependent strength reduction factors," J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 119(12).
  17. Miranda, E., and Bertero, V.V. (1994), "Evaluation of strength reduction factors for earthquake resistant design," Earthq. Spect., Earthquake Engineering Research, 10(2), 357-379. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585778
  18. Nassar, A.A., and Krawinkler (1991), "Seismic demand for SDOF and MDOF systems," John A. Blume EEC, Report No.95, Stanford Univ., CA.
  19. SEAOC (1999), "Recommended lateral force requirements and commentary," Seismology Committee, Structural Engineers Association of California.
  20. UBC (1997), Structural Engineering Design Provisions, 2, Int. Conf. of Building Officials.
  21. Vidic, T., Fajfar, P., and Fischinger, M. (1992), "A procedure for determining consistent inelastic design spectra," Proc. of Workshop on Nonlinear Seismic Analysis, Slovenia, July.

Cited by

  1. Application of MPA to estimate probability of collapse of structures vol.39, pp.11, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.992
  2. P-Δ Effects on Seismic Force Modification Factors for Modified-Clough and EPP Hysteretic Models vol.12, pp.4, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1260/136943309789508492
  3. The New Formulation of the Behavior Factor's “Theoretical -regulatory Aspect” vol.11, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20141103001
  4. Derivation of yield force coefficient for RC frames considering energy balance and P-delta effects vol.79, pp.4, 2001, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2021.79.4.429