Journal of the Korean Chemical Society (대한화학회지)

Korean Chemical Society (대한화학회)
권호 표지

변칙 사례의 특성이 인지 갈등과 개념 변화에 미치는 영향

  • Gang, Seok Jin (Department of Chemistry Education, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Sun Ju (Department of Chemistry Education, Seoul National University) ;
  • No, Tae Hui (Department of Chemistry Education, Seoul National University)
  • Published : 20011200
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, the effects of the number and the presentational type of anomalous data on students'cognitive conflict and conceptual change in studying 'conservation of mass before and after combustion'were investigated. The subjects were 128 eighth graders in a co-ed middle school. A preconception test, a test of response to anomalous data, and a conception test were administered. Four types of anomalous data varying the number (one/two) and the presentational type (text/text+figure) were presented. The results indicated that students with two anomalous data showed more cognitive conflicts than those with one. However, no significant differences in the degree of cognitive conflict were found by the presentational types of anomalous data. The ANOVA results indicated that there were no significant differences by the characteristics of anomalous data in the conception test scores.

본 연구에서는 '연소 전후 질량 보존'개념의 학습에서 변칙 사례의 개수와 표현 방식이 학생들의 인지 갈등과 개념 변화에 미치는 효과를 조사하였다. 남녀 공학 중학교 2학년 128명을 대상으로 선개념 검사, 변칙 사례에 대한 반응 검사, 개념 검사를 실시하였다. 변칙사례는 개수(1개/2개)와 표현 방식(글/글+그림)에 따라 네 종류로 제시하였다. 연구 결과 변칙 사례를 두 개 읽은 학생들이 하나 읽은 학생들보다 더 많은 인지 갈등을 일으켰다. 그러나 변칙 사례의 표현 방식에 따른 인지 갈등 유발 정도는 유의미한 차이가 없었다. 개념 검사 점수에 이원 변량 분석 결과, 변칙 사례의 특성에 따른 차이는 유의미하지 않았다.

Keywords

References

  1. Journal of Research in Science Teaching v.34 no.701 Guzzetti, B. J.;Williams, W. O.;Skeels, S. A.;Wu, S. M.
  2. Elementary School Journal v.91 no.109 Neale, D. C.; Smith, D.; Johnson, V. G.
  3. Science Education v.74 no.555 Dreyfus, A.;Jungwirth, E.;Eliovitch, R.
  4. 한국과학교육학회지 v.20 no.288 노태희;임희연;강석진
  5. 한국과학교육학회지 v.20 no.634 노태희;임희연;강석진
  6. Review of Educational Research v.63 no.1 Chinn, C.;Brewer, W. F.
  7. Journal of Research in Science Teaching v.35 no.623 Chinn, C.;Brewer, W. F.
  8. Research in Science Education v.28 no.365 Park, J.;Kim, I.
  9. Instructional Science v.22 no.75 Gorsky, P.;Finegold, M.
  10. Journal of Educational Psychology v.80 no.67 Burbules, N. C.;Linn, M. C.
  11. Learning and instruction: Theory into practice Bell-Gradler, M. E.
  12. Mental representation: A dual coding approach; Paivio, A.
  13. Journal of Research in Science Teaching v.34 no.199 Noh, T.; Scharmann, L. C.
  14. Journal of Educational Psychology v.79 no.14 Holmes, B. C.
  15. Journal of Educational Psychology v.88 no.64 Mayer, R. E.;Bove, W.;Bryman, A.;Mars, R.;Tapangco, L.
  16. 서울대학교 사대논총 인쇄중 노태희;임희연;강석진
  17. Children’s ideas in science Driver, R.;Driver R.(ed);Guesne E.(ed); Tiberghien A.(ed)
  18. Children’s ideas in science; Driver, R.;Guesne, E.;Tiberghien, A.;Driver R.(ed); Guesne E.(ed);Tiberghien A.(ed)
  19. 대한화학학회지 제출중 강석진;신숙희;노태희
  20. Journal of Educational Psychology v.86 no.389 Mayer, R. E.;Sims, V. K.
  21. International Journal of Science Education v.22 no.203 Martin, B. L.;Mintzes, J. J.;Clavijo, I. E.
  22. Restructuring science education The importance of theories and their development Duschl, R. A.
  23. International handbook of science education Chinn, C.;Brewer, W. F.;Fraser, B. J.(ed);Tobin, K. G.(ed)
  24. Cognitive responses in persuasion Hass, R. G.;Petty R. E.(ed);Ostrom T. M.(ed);Brock T. C.