Bioequivalence of Azela Tablet to Azeptin Tablet (Azelastine Hydrochloride 1 mg)

아젭틴 정(염산아젤라스틴 1 mg)에 대한 아젤라 정의 생물학적 동등성

  • Cho, Hea-Young (College of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Drug Development, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Yun, Ji-Hun (College of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Drug Development, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Seo, Yu-Lee (College of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Drug Development, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Oh, In-Joon (College of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Drug Development, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Lee, Sung-Kwan (Medical School, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Moon, Jai-Dong (Medical School, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Lee, Yong-Bok (College of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Drug Development, Chonnam National University)
  • 조혜영 (전남대학교 약학대학/약품개발연구소) ;
  • 윤지훈 (전남대학교 약학대학/약품개발연구소) ;
  • 서유리 (전남대학교 약학대학/약품개발연구소) ;
  • 오인준 (전남대학교 약학대학/약품개발연구소) ;
  • 이성관 (전남대학교 의과대학) ;
  • 문재동 (전남대학교 의과대학) ;
  • 이용복 (전남대학교 약학대학/약품개발연구소)
  • Published : 2001.03.20

Abstract

Azelastine, a phthalazinone derivative, is an antiallergic agent which demonstrates histamine $H_1-receptor$ antagonist activity and also inhibits histamine release from mast cells following antigen and non-antigen stimuli. Thus, azelastine may be useful in the management of both asthma and allergic disorders. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of two azelastine hydrochloride tablets, $Azeptin^{TM}$ (Bu Kwang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.) and $Azela^{TM}$ (Kyung Dong Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.), according to the guidelines of Korea Food and Drug Administration (KFDA). Eighteen normal male volunteers, $22.44{\pm}2.01$ years in age and $61.99{\pm}6.18\;kg$ in body weight, were divided into two groups and a randomized $2{\times}2$ cross-over study was employed. After two tablets containing 1 mg of azelastine hydrochloride per tablet were orally administered, blood was taken at predetermined time intervals and the concentrations of azelastine in serum were determined using HPLC with fluorescence detector. Pharmacokinetic parameters such as $AUC_t$, $C_{max}\;and\;T_{max}$ were calculated and ANOVA test was utilized for the statistical analysis of the parameters. The results showed that the differences in $AUC_t$, $C_{max}\;and\;T_{max}$ between two tablets were -6.45%, -2.60% and -7.14%, respectively, when calculated against the $Azeptin^{TM}$ tablet. The powers $(1-{\beta})$ for $AUC_t\;and\;C_{max}$ were 96.65% and 88.47%, respectively. Minimum detectable differences $({\Delta})$ at ${\alpha}=0.05$ and $1-{\beta}=0.8$ were less than 20% (e.g., 14.40% and 17.65% for $AUC_t\;and\;C_{max}$, respectively). The 90% confidence intervals were within ${\pm}20%$ (e.g., $-14.87{\sim}1.97$ and $-12.92{\sim}7.72$ for $AUC_t\;and\;C_{max}$, respectively). Two parameters met the criteria of KFDA for bioequivalence, indicating that $Azela^{TM]$ tablet is bioequivalent to $Azeptin^{TM}$ tablet.

Keywords