무역상무연구 (THE INTERNATIONAL COMMERCE & LAW REVIEW)
- 제14권
- /
- Pages.7-35
- /
- 2000
- /
- 1229-2036(pISSN)
매도인(賣渡人)이 제공하는 인도증빙서류(引渡證憑書類)의 문제점(問題點)에 관한 연구(硏究) (INCOTERMS 2000을 중심(中心)으로)
A study on the problems of transport document as a proof of delivery on INCOTERMS 2000
초록
The purpose of this paper is to examine the meanings of delivery of each trade term in INCOTERMS 2000, to investigate various kinds of transport document as a proof of delivery, and finally to find their problems. As a result of examination, following problems are considered to happen practically. First, a multimodal transport document referred in FOB term seems to be unappropriate because FOB term can be used in sea or inland waterway transport. Second, Assuming resale in transit in CFR or CIF term, non-negotiable Sea Waybill seems to be inappropriate. Third, As Sea Waybill is not a document of title, it can not be a security when the bank negotiate seller's draft. Fourth, INCOTERMS 2000 deleted the reference to charter party in CFR or CIF term. This deletion may raise any legal problems for the liabilities of carrier when the contradictions happen between the charter party B/L and charter party. Finally, if CFR or CIF means symbolic delivery, other documents besides B/L can not be a symbols of goods.