Lumbar Spinal Instability and Its Radiologic Findings

요추부 불안정증의 방사선학적 소견

  • Yang, Kyoung Hoon (Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Hanyang University) ;
  • Kim, Nam Kyu (Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Hanyang University) ;
  • Kim, Young Soo (Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Hanyang University) ;
  • Ko, Yong (Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Hanyang University) ;
  • Oh, Seong Hoon (Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Hanyang University) ;
  • Oh, Suck Jun (Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Hanyang University) ;
  • Kim, Kwang Myung (Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Hanyang University)
  • 양경훈 (한양대학교 의과대학 신경외과학교실) ;
  • 김남규 (한양대학교 의과대학 신경외과학교실) ;
  • 김영수 (한양대학교 의과대학 신경외과학교실) ;
  • 고용 (한양대학교 의과대학 신경외과학교실) ;
  • 오성훈 (한양대학교 의과대학 신경외과학교실) ;
  • 오석전 (한양대학교 의과대학 신경외과학교실) ;
  • 김광명 (한양대학교 의과대학 신경외과학교실)
  • Received : 1999.05.19
  • Accepted : 1999.06.24
  • Published : 2000.01.28

Abstract

Objective : Lumbar spinal instability occurs when normal biomechanics support in lumbar vertebrae interrupted. Despite the recent enthusiastic studies, the precise radiological assessment has not been fully established, yet. Therefore, we carefully studied our cases to analyze the radiologic findings in lumbar spinal instability. Patients and Methods : We have put together radiological analysis and assessment based on 38 patients who have been diagnosed and treated for lumbar spinal instabilities from June 1994 to December 1998, Patients who have been diagnosed and treated for trauma were excluded from study. Results : The outcomes are as follows : 1) Lumbar lordotic curve was statistically significant in unstable group by 23.7, compared to the control group ($17.0^{\circ}$). 2) According to the resting x-ray, sagittal plane angulation measured on unstable group was $21.1^{\circ}$, control group $18.0^{\circ}$. Therefore unstable group was noticeably higher(p<0.01). 3) According to the resting x-ray sagittal plane displacement, unstable group had 4.3mm, the comparison had 1.2mm. Therefore measurement from the unstable group were significantly higher(p<0.01). 4) According to stress view, sagittal plane translation was 4.1mm for the unstables and 2.7mm for the comparisons. Therefore unstables were noticeably higher(p<0.01). 5) According to stress view, sagittal plane rotation was $15.1^{\circ}$ at L3-4, $22.0^{\circ}$ at L4-5, $27.9^{\circ}$ at L5S1 for the unstable group and $11.3^{\circ}$, $18.1^{\circ}$, $21.0^{\circ}$ each for the comparison. 6) Facet angle for unstable group, left $29.3^{\circ}-61.5^{\circ}$, right $24.4^{\circ}-63.2^{\circ}$ and the mean for each are $43.1^{\circ}$, $47.2^{\circ}$. The difference between left and right facet angle was $3.5^{\circ}-20.7^{\circ}$ and the mean value $15.3^{\circ}$. Facet angle for the comparisons for the left was $29.3^{\circ}-59.5^{\circ}$, right was in between $25.7^{\circ}-64.5^{\circ}$ range and the each mean are $44.9^{\circ}$ and $47.6^{\circ}$. Also, the difference between left and right facet angle was $4.1^{\circ}-9.3^{\circ}$ and the average was $17.1^{\circ}$. The average and the difference between the left and right angle are found not to have statistic necessity for both unstable and stable measurements(p>0.01). 7) 19 patients were found to have vacuum facet phenomenon among unstable group etc. results were collected. Conclusion : According to above results, we attempted to prepare the application to the patient of radiological analysis and assessment for lumbar spinal instability early checkup.

Keywords