The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)
- Volume 38 Issue 3
- /
- Pages.310-320
- /
- 2000
- /
- 0301-2875(pISSN)
- /
- 2005-3789(eISSN)
A Study on the Accuracy of the record base of the Complete Denture to the Master Cast according to Kinds of Resin and Polymerization Method
- Choi, Hyo-Jin (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
-
Lim, Ju-Hwan
(Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
- Cho, In-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
- Published : 2000.06.01
Abstract
Statement of the problem. The record base in fabricating procedures of the complete denture, as a temporary form for reproducing denture base, is used to record upper and lower jaw relation and to align artificial teeth and try-in it in the mouth. The accuracy of jaw relation record is affected by the accuracy, stiffness and stability of the record base. So, the accuracy of record base is the most important requirements of jaw relation records. Purpose of study. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the gap that occurred over the palatal area of a maxillary record base fabricated with autopolymerizing resin and light-curing resin. Methods/material. The maxillary record bases were fabricated out of autopolymerizing resin that is used the most frequently in clinics and light-curing resin that attracts special attention for its several merits. The light-curing resin was made by two kinds of polymerization methods, which are one step curing method and multiple step curing method. All record bases were cut in certain positions of the master cast 1 hour and 1 day later after fabrication and the accuracy of the master cast was measured and analyzed with a microscope. Results. A pattern of gap formation between the record base and the maxillary cast was observed in all specimens. According to kinds of resins, autopolymerizing resin was significantly more accurate than light-curing resin. There was no statistical difference according to time lapse, and in all three groups, the maximum discrepancy occurred at the posterior border in the mid-palatal region. Conclusion. The autopolymerizing resin is better than light-curing resin, and multiple step curing method is more accurate than one step curing method when using light-curing resin.
Keywords