CLINICAL EVALUATION OF PROGNOSIS OF OSSEOINTEGRATED DENTAL IMPLANT IN TREATMENT OF MAXILLARY EDENTULOUS AREA

골유착 치과 임플란트를 이용한 상악 무치악부 치료의 예후에 관한 임상적 평가

  • Shim, Won-Bo (Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Lee, Dong-Keun (Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Choi, Kyu-Hwan (Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial, Korea Veterance Hospital)
  • 심원보 (원광대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 이동근 (원광대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 최규환 (한국보훈병원 치과 구강악안면외과)
  • Received : 1999.03.10
  • Accepted : 1999.04.13
  • Published : 1999.06.30

Abstract

The use of osseointegrated implant has been reported that is an acceptable procedure for the restoration of totally or partially edentulous patient and that offers good predictability of long term success. It is difficult to get high success rate in edentulous maxillae with inadequate bony quality and quantity, and anatomic limitations such as pneumatic maxillary sinus and nasal floor. The various trials such as sinus lifting, bone grafting, guided bone regeneration, trabecular condensation with osteotome, and the use of wide-diameter implant have been introduced to solve these problems. This study was undertaken to assess the evaluation of clinical prognosis of the implant restorations with these various implantation techniques in the maxillary edentulous area. One hundred eight patients were treated with a total of 386 endosseous implants from March 1994 to January 1998 at Dept. of Dentistry, Korea Veterans Hospital in Seoul Korea. The various techniques for implantation in the edentulous maxillae were supplied to overcome the limitations of implant fixation. These techniques consist of sinus lifting, guided bone regeneration, onlay bone grafting, and osteotome trabecular condensation technique. The total success rate of implant restoration of this study was 93% in the maxillae. The success rate of implant restorations with conventional technique was 94.6%, with osteotome trabecular condensation technique was 94.1%, with guided bone regeneration technique was 93.3%, with bone grafting technique was 92.9%, with sinus lifting technique was 83.8%. The success rate on the maxillary anterior area was 95.2% and that on the posterior area was 91.9%. The failures were associated not only with surgical installation techniques but also bony quality and quantity, characteristics of implant, and stress distribution when in function.

Keywords