DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Optimum design of parabolic and circular arches with varying cross section

  • Uzman, Umit (Department of Civil Engineering, Karadeniz Technical University) ;
  • Daloglu, Ayse (Department of Civil Engineering, Karadeniz Technical University) ;
  • Saka, M. Polat (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Bahrain)
  • Published : 1999.11.25

Abstract

A structural optimization process is presented for arches with varying cross-section. The optimality criteria method is used to develop a recursive relationship for the design variables considering displacement, stresses and minimum depth constraints. The depth at the crown and at the support are taken as design variables first. Then the approach is extended by taking the depth values of each joint as design variable. The curved beam element of constant cross section is used to model the parabolic and circular arches with varying cross section. A number of design examples are presented to demonstrate the application of the method.

Keywords

References

  1. Arbabi, F. (1991), Structural Analysis and Behavior, McGraw-Hill.
  2. Bensalem, A., Sibbald, A. and Fairfield, C.A. (1998), "The use of dynamic characteristics for the optimal design of arches", Comp. & Struct. 68(5), 461-472. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(98)00092-3
  3. Cook, R.D., Malkus, D.S. and Plesha, M.E. (1989), Concepts and Applications of Finite Element Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, Canada.
  4. Ding, Y. (1986), "Shape optimization of structures: A literature survey", Comp. & Struct. 24(6), 985-1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(86)90307-X
  5. Haftka, R.T., Gurdal, Z. and Kamat, M.P. (1990), Elements of Structural Optimization, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  6. Hayalioglu, M.S. and Saka, M.P. (1992), "Optimum design of geometrically nonlinear elastic-plastic steel frames with tapered members", Comp. & Struct. 44(4), 915-924. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(92)90479-J
  7. Marquis, J.P. and Wang, T.M. (1989), "Stiffness matrix of parabolic beam element", Comp. & Struct. 31(6), 863-870. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(89)90271-X
  8. No, M. and Aguinagalde, J.M. (1987), "Finite element method and optimality criterion based structual optimization", Comp. & Struct. 27(2), 287-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(87)90096-4
  9. Saka, M.P. and Hayalioglu, M.S. (1991), "Optimum design of geometrically nonlinear elastic-plastic steel frames", Comp. & Struct. 38(3), 329-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(91)90110-8
  10. Saka, M.P.and Ulker, M. (1992), "Optimum design of geometrically nonlinear space trusses", Comp. & Struct. 42(3), 289-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(92)90025-U
  11. Tadjbakhsh, I.G. (1981), "Stability and optimum desing of arch-type structures", Int. J. Solids & Struct. 17, 565-574. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(81)90019-6
  12. Tin-Loi, F. (1992), "Optimal plastic design of arches", Comp. & Struct. 43(4), 675-679. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(92)90508-W

Cited by

  1. Form-finding algorithm for masonry arches subjected to in-plane earthquake loading vol.195, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2017.10.001