DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Study on sensitivity of modal parameters for suspension bridges

  • Liu, Chunhua (Department of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University) ;
  • Wang, Ton-Lo (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Florida International University) ;
  • Qin, Quan (Department of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University)
  • Published : 1999.11.25

Abstract

Safety monitoring systems of structures generally resort to detecting possible changes of dynamic system parameters. Sensitivity analysis of these dynamic system parameters may implement these techniques. Conventional structural eigenvalue problems are discussed in the scope of those systems with deterministic parameters. Large and flexible structures, such as suspension bridges, actually possess stochastic material properties and these random properties unavoidably affect the dynamic system parameters. The sensitivity matrix of structural modal parameters to basic design variables has been established in this paper. Moreover, second order statistics of natural frequencies due to the randomness of material properties have been discussed. It is concluded from numerical analysis of a modem suspension bridge that although the second order statistics of frequencies are small relatively to the change of basic design variables, such as density of mass and modulus of elasticity, the sensitivities of modal parameters to these variables at different locations change in magnitude.

Keywords

References

  1. Alampalli, S., Fu, G. and Dillon, E.W. (1997), "Signal versus noise in damage detection by experimental modal analysis" , Journal of Structural Engineering, 123(2), 237-245. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:2(237)
  2. Alaylioglu, H. and Alaylioglu, A. (1997), "Dynamic structural assessment of a highway bridge via hybrid FE model and in situ testing" , Computers and Structures, 63(3), 439-453. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(96)00364-1
  3. Ang, Alfredo H-S. and Tang, Wilson H. (1975), Probability Concepts in Engineering Planning and Design: Volume I-Basic Principles, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  4. Benaroya, H.and Rehak, M. (1988), "Finite element methods in probabilistic structural analysis", A selective review, Appl. Mech. Rev., 41(5), 201-213. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3151892
  5. Bulleit, W.M. and Yates, J.L. (1991), "Probabilistic analysis of wood trusses" , J. Stuct. Engrg., ASCE, 117(10), 3008-3025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1991)117:10(3008)
  6. Clough, R.W. and Penzien, J. (1975), Dynamics of Structures, McGraw-Hill, New York.
  7. Der Kiureghian, A. and Liu P.L. (1986), "Structural reliability under incomplete probability information" , J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 112(1), 85-103. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1986)112:1(85)
  8. Ghanem, R.G. and Spanos, P.D. (1991), Stochastic Finite Elements: A Spectral Approach, SpringerVerlag, N.Y.
  9. Gentile, C. and Cabrera, F.M. (1997), "Dynamic inverstigation of repaired cable-stayed bridge", Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 26(1), 41-59. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199701)26:1<41::AID-EQE622>3.0.CO;2-U
  10. Kleiber, M. and Hier, T.D. (1992), The Stochastic Finite Element Method, Basic Perturbation Technique and Computer Implementation, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, England.
  11. Liu, C.H. and Qin, Q. (1996), "Reliability analysis of steel frame structures based on SFEM", International Conference on Advances in Steel Structures, Proceedings, Hong Kong. 171-176.
  12. Mahadevan, S. and Haldar, A., (1991), "Stochastic FEM-based validation of LRFD" , J. Stuct. Engrg., ASCE, 117(5), 1393-1412. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1991)117:5(1393)
  13. Satake, N. and Yokota, H. (1996), "Evaluation of vibration properties of high-rise steel buildings using data of vibration tests and earthquake observations", Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 59(2-3), 265-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(96)00011-6
  14. Scheidt, J.V. and Purkert W. (1983), Random Eigenvalue Problems, Elsevier Science Publishing Co. Inc., New York.
  15. Shinozuka, M. and Deodatis G. (1988), "Response variability of stochastic finite element systems" , J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 114(3), 499-519. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1988)114:3(499)
  16. Vanmarcke, E.H. (1983), Random Fields: Analysis and Synthesis. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
  17. Wedel-Heinen, J. (1991), Vibration of geometrically imperfect beam and shell structures", Int J Solids Struct, 27(1), 29-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(91)90143-4

Cited by

  1. Stochastic seismic analysis of Kömürhan Highway Bridge with varying material properties vol.32, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1080/10286608.2015.1013796
  2. Stochastic finite element analysis of long-span bridges with CFRP cables under earthquake ground motion vol.35, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-010-0013-1
  3. A simplified analysis of the behavior of suspension bridges under live load vol.30, pp.5, 2008, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2008.30.5.559
  4. Stochastic finite element analysis of a cable-stayed bridge system with varying material properties vol.25, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2010.01.008
  5. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis of two suspension bridges in Istanbul, Turkey to near- and far-fault ground motion vol.12, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-459-2012
  6. Stochastic finite element method based on point estimate and Karhunen-Loéve expansion vol.91, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00419-020-01819-8