토양(土壤) 수분(水分)포텐셜이 오이(Cucumis sativus L.)생육(生育)과 토양(土壤) 이화학적(理化學的 ) 특성(特性)에 미치는 영향(影響)

Effect of Soil Water Potential on Pysico-Chemical Properties of Soil and Cucumber(Cucumis sativus L.) Growth

오이를 시설(施設) 재배(栽培)할 때 토양(土壤) 수분(水分) 장력(張力)의 변화(變化)에 따른 오이 생육(生育) 반응(反應)과 토양(土壤) 이화학적(理化學的) 성질(性質)을 구명하기 위하여 토양(土壤) 수분장력(水分張力)이 0.2, 1/3, 0.5그리고 1.0 bar일 때를 관수시점(灌水時點)으로 하여 겨우살이 청장오이를 공시품종(供試品種)으로 하여 오이를 재배(栽培)하면서 일련의 시험을 수행한 바 얻어진 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 공시토양(供試土壤)의 토성(土性)은 수분(水分) 특성상 양토(壤土)(Loam)이며, 처리조건별 1회 요관수량(要灌水量)은 각각 4.4, 7.3, 9.6 그리고 13.4 mm였다. 물 관리(管理) 수지(收支)는 봄재배(栽培)의 경우 0.2 bar의 관수처리(灌水處理)시 관수간격(灌水間隔)은 2.3일, 관수(灌水)회수는 37회, 총관수량은 163.5 mm였고 1.0 bar는 각각 14.8일, 6회 그리고 80.3 mm였으며, 가을재배(栽培)의 경우에도 이와 같은 경향이었다. 시험 후 토양(土壤) 화학적(化學的)의 변화(變化)는 0.2 bar 처리구에서의 pH와 EC 그리고 치환성가리(加里)의 함량이 개량목표치(改良目標値)에 분포(分布)한 반면, 나머지 처리구에서는 양토(壤土)에 EC가 높았으며 유효인산함량(有效燐酸含量)과 치환성 염기함량(鹽基含量)도 높은 경향이었다. 토양(土壤)의 물리성은 1.0 bar처리시 고상(固相)은 44.9%, 용적밀도(容積密度가) $1.26g\;cm^{-3}$로 가장 높았으며, 0.2 bar처리시에는 고상(固相)이 41.7%, 용적밀도(容積密度)가 $1.09cm^{-3}$로 가장 낮았다. 근(根)의 분포(分布)는 0.2 bar처리구가 근(根) 신장생육(伸張生育)과 비대생육(肥大生育)이 가장 양호한 반면, 1/3 bar처리구에서는 가장 불량하였다. 수량(收量)을 보면 0.2 bar 처리구에서의 총수량(總收量)은 7.269 kg, 상품(上品) 과중(果重)은 5,677 kg으로 가장 높았고, 1/3 bar 처리구는 수량(收量)도 가장 낮았고 곡과율(曲果率)도 높았다.

A field experiments was carried out to investigate the physicochemical properties of soil and cucumber growth in vinyl house when irrigation point was made at 0.2, 1/3, 0.5 and 1.0 bar. The obtained results was summarized as follow: The taxonomic class of the soil used was loam and each content of the required water was 4.4, 7.3, 9.6 and 13.4 mm per each irrigation time at 0.2, 1/3, 0.5 and 1.0 bar treatments in spring culture, respectively. At 0.2 bar and 1.0 bar treatments, interval of irrigation was 2.3 and 14.8 day, the times of irrigation was 37 and 6, and total irrigation volume was 163.5 and 80.3 mm, respectively. After cucumber culture, pH, EC concentration and exchangeable K content of soil at 0.2 bar treatment was distributed near to the level of improvement target while EC, available $P_2O_5$ and exchangeable base content in other treatments were higher compared to improvement target. At 1.0 bar treatment, ratios of the solid and liquid phase were 44.9 and 27.1%, respectively, and bulk density was $1.26g\;cm^{-3}$ which was the highest among the treatments. At 0.2 bar treatment, the ratio of the solid and liquid phase was 41.7 and 22.8%, respectively, and bulk density was $1.09g\;cm^{-3}$ which was the lowest. The root length and radius at 0.2 bar treatment were best, while those at 1/3 bar were worst. At 0.2 bar treatment, the total yield was 7,269 kg and the weight of good products was 5,677 kg which was the highest among treatments. At 0.33 bar treatment, the yield was the lowest with the high ratio of deformity.