DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Generalized equivalent spectrum technique

  • Piccardo, G. (DISEG, Department of Structural and Geotechnical Engineering, University of Genova) ;
  • Solari, G. (DISEG, Department of Structural and Geotechnical Engineering, University of Genova)
  • 발행 : 1998.06.25

초록

Wind forces on structures are usually schematized by the sum of their mean static part and a nil mean fluctuation generally treated as a stationary process randomly varying in space and time. The multi-variate and multi-dimensional nature of such a process requires a considerable quantity of numerical procedures to carry out the dynamic analysis of the structural response. With the aim of drastically reducing the above computational burden, this paper introduces a method by means of which the external fluctuating wind forces on slender structures and structural elements are schematized by an equivalent process identically coherent in space. This process is identified by a power spectral density function, called the Generalized Equivalent Spectrum, whose expression is given in closed form.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Davenport, A.G. (1961), "The application of statistical concepts to wind loading of structures", Proc. Instn. Civ. Engrs. 19, 449-472. https://doi.org/10.1680/iicep.1961.11304
  2. Di Paola, M. (1998), "Digital simulation of wind field velocity" , J. Wind Engng. Ind. Aerod., in press.
  3. Engineering Sciences Data Unit (1990a), "Circular-cylindrical structures : dynamic response to vortex shedding. Pt 1 : Calculation procedures and derivation" , ESDU Item 85038, London, England.
  4. Engineering Sciences Data Unit (1990b), "Characteristics of atmospheric turbulence near the ground. Part II : Single point data for strong winds (neutral atmosphere)" , ESDU Item 85020, London, England.
  5. Piccardo, G. & G. Solari (1996a), "A refined model for calculating 3-D equivalent static wind forces on structures", J. Wind Engng. Ind. Aerod., 65, 21-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(97)00019-6
  6. Piccardo, G. & G. Solari (1996b), "Equivalent wind loading spectrum technique", Proc., 3rd Europ. Conf. On Struct. Dyn., Florence, Balkema, Rotterdam, 213-220.
  7. Piccardo, G. & G. Solari (1998), "3-D wind excited response of slender structures : Basic formulation, closed form solution, applications", submitted for possible publication in the J. Struct. Engng., ASCE.
  8. Shinozuka, M. & C.M. Jan (1972), "Digital simulation of random processes and its applications", J. Sound Vibr., 25(1), 111-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(72)90600-1
  9. Solari, G. (1985), "Mathematical model to predict 3-D wind loading on buildings", J. Engng. Mech., ASCE, 111, 254-276. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1985)111:2(254)
  10. Solari G. (1988), "Equivalent wind spectrum technique : theory and applications", J. Struct. Engng., ASCE, 114, 1303-1323. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:6(1303)
  11. Solari, G. (1994), "Gust-excited vibrations of structures", In Sockel, H. Ed., Wind-excited vibrations of structures, Springer-Verlag, Wien, 195-291.
  12. Solari, G. & G. Piccardo (1998), "Probabilistic 3-D turbulence modeling for gust buffeting" , to be submitted for publication.
  13. Vellozzi, J. & E. Cohen (1968), "Gust response factor", J. Struct. Div., ASCE. 97, 1295-1313.
  14. Vickery, B.J. & W. Clark (1972), "Lift or across-wind response of tapered stacks" , J. Struct. Division, ASCE. 98, 1-20.

피인용 문헌

  1. 3-D gust effect factor for slender vertical structures vol.17, pp.2, 2002, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-8920(01)00034-0
  2. A numerical approach for the evaluation of wind-induced effects on inclined, slender structural elements vol.21, pp.7-8, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2016.1164088
  3. Dynamic crosswind fatigue of slender vertical structures vol.5, pp.6, 2002, https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2002.5.6.527
  4. Gust Buffeting of Slender Structures and Structural Elements: Simplified Formulas for Design Calculations and Code Provisions vol.144, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001949
  5. Structural health monitoring of wind towers: residual fatigue life estimation vol.22, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/22/4/045017
  6. Closed form prediction of 3-D wind-excited response of slender structures vol.74-76, 1998, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(98)00063-4
  7. Examination of experimental variability in HFFB testing of a tall building under multi-directional winds vol.171, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.09.001
  8. A fully-coupled generalized model for multi-directional wind loads on tall buildings: A development of the quasi-steady theory vol.78, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2017.12.008
  9. A generalized gust factor technique for evaluating the wind–induced response of aeroelastic structures sensitive to vortex-induced vibrations vol.70, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2017.01.017
  10. Alongwind load effects on free-standing lattice towers vol.155, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2016.06.004
  11. GUST BUFFETING AND AEROELASTIC BEHAVIOUR OF POLES AND MONOTUBULAR TOWERS vol.13, pp.7-8, 1999, https://doi.org/10.1006/jfls.1999.0240
  12. Simulation and analysis of intervention costs due to wind-induced damage on tall buildings vol.87, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.01.001
  13. Gust buffeting and turbulence uncertainties vol.90, pp.4-5, 2002, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(01)00202-1
  14. Dynamic alongwind fatigue of slender vertical structures vol.23, pp.12, 2001, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00021-9
  15. The role of analytical methods for evaluating the wind-induced response of structures vol.90, pp.12-15, 2002, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(02)00264-7
  16. Structural health monitoring of wind towers: remote damage detection using strain sensors vol.20, pp.5, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/20/5/055009
  17. Wind modes for structural dynamics: a continuous approach vol.17, pp.2, 2002, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-8920(01)00036-4
  18. Serviceability assessment of footbridges in unrestricted pedestrian traffic conditions vol.12, pp.12, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2016.1157610
  19. Probabilistic 3-D turbulence modeling for gust buffeting of structures vol.16, pp.1, 2001, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-8920(00)00010-2
  20. Double Modal Transformation and Wind Engineering Applications vol.127, pp.5, 2001, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2001)127:5(432)
  21. A Monte Carlo based method for the dynamic “fragility analysis” of tall buildings under turbulent wind loading vol.33, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.10.024
  22. Coupling between structural and fluid dynamic problems applied to vortex shedding in a 90m steel chimney vol.100, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2011.10.007
  23. Thunderstorm response spectrum technique: Theory and applications vol.108, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.11.012
  24. 3D Wind-Excited Response of Slender Structures: Closed-Form Solution vol.126, pp.8, 2000, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2000)126:8(936)
  25. A unified framework for performance-based wind engineering of tall buildings in hurricane-prone regions based on lifetime intervention-cost estimation vol.73, pp.None, 1998, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2018.02.003
  26. Wind-load fragility analysis of monopole towers by Layered Stochastic-Approximation-Monte-Carlo method vol.174, pp.None, 1998, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.081
  27. Thunderstorm Downbursts and Wind Loading of Structures: Progress and Prospect vol.6, pp.None, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2020.00063
  28. Life-Cycle Cost Analysis of a Point-Like Structure Subjected to Tornadic Wind Loads vol.146, pp.2, 1998, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0002480
  29. Gust Buffeting and Aerodynamic Admittance of Structures with Arbitrary Mode Shapes. I: Enhanced Equivalent Spectrum Technique vol.147, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)em.1943-7889.0001872
  30. Gust Buffeting and Aerodynamic Admittance of Structures with Arbitrary Mode Shapes. II: A POD-Based Interpretation vol.147, pp.1, 1998, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)em.1943-7889.0001873