Structural Engineering and Mechanics

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Methods of pairwise comparisons and fuzzy global criterion for multiobjective optimization in structural engineering

  • Shih, C.J. (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tamkang University) ;
  • Yu, K.C. (Center of Vehicle Design and Development, Yeu Tyan Machinery Manufacturing Company)
  • Published : 1998.01.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The method of pairwise comparison inherently contains information of ambiguity, fuzziness and conflict in design goals for a multiobjective structural design. This paper applies the principle of paired comparison so that the vaguely formulated problem can be modified and a set of numerically acceptable weight would reflect the relatively important degree of multiple objectives. This paper also presents a fuzzy global criterion method ($FGCM_{\lambda}$) included fuzzy constraints that coupled with the objective weighting rank obtained from the modified pairwise comparisons for fuzzy multiobjective optimization problems. Descriptions in sequence of this combined method and problem solving experiences are given in the current article. Multiobjective design examples of truss and mechanical spring structures illustrate this optimization process containing the revising judgement techniques.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : National Science Council

References

  1. Arora, J.S. (1989), Optimum Design, McGraw Hill, New York.
  2. Carmicael, D.G. (1980), "Computation of pareto optima in structural design", Int. J. for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 15, 925-929. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620150610
  3. Cohon, J.L. (1978), Multiobjective Programming and Planning, Academic Press, New York.
  4. Hajela, P. and Shih, C.J. (1990), "Multiobjective optimum design in mixed integer and discrete design variable problems", AIAA Journal, 28(4), 670-675. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.10445
  5. Hwang, C.L. and Masud, A.S.M. (1979), Multiple Objective Decision Marking: Methods and Application; A State-of-Art Survey. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York.
  6. Koski, J. (1984), "Multicriterion optimization in structural design", New Directions in Optimum Structural Design, Edited by E. Atrek, R.H. Gallagher, K.M. Ragsdell, and O.C. Zienkiewicz. John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 483-503.
  7. Osyczka, A. (1985), "Multicriteria optimization for engineering design", Design Optimization, 193-227.
  8. Rao, S.S. (1987a), "Description and optimum design of fuzzy mechanical systems", J. of Mech.,Trans. and Auto. in Design. Trans. ASME, 109, 126-132. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3258776
  9. Rao, S.S. (1987b), "Multi-objective optimization of fuzzy structural systems", Int. J. for Numerical Methods in Eng., 24, 115-1171.
  10. Saaty, T.L. (1980), The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York.
  11. Shih, C.J. and Lai, T.K. (1994), "Fuzzy weighting optimization with several objective functions in structural design", Computers & Structures, 52(5), 917-924. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(94)90076-0
  12. Shih, C.J. and Yu, K.C. (1995), "Weighting objective strategy in multicriterion fuzzy mechanical and structural optimization", Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 3(4), 373-382. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.1995.3.4.373
  13. Zadeh, L. (1965), "Fuzzy sets", Information and Control, 8, 338-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X