전원개발계획 최적화 모형에 기초한 DSM 자원의 회피발전비용 계산

Evaluation of Generation Avoided Costs of a DSM Resource Using the Long-term Generation Expansion Planning Model

  • 발행 : 1998.03.01

초록

본 연구는 회피비용의 정의 및 개념을 소개하고 계산 방법론을 제시하였으며, 사례연구를 통하여 DSM 프로그램의 의사결정에 필요한 회피발전비용을 시산하였다. 본 연구에서 적용한 회피발전비용 계산 앨고리즘인 수요감소법은 전력회사의 DSM 프로그램 도입 전후에 대하여 소요수입의 현금흐름의 비교에 바탕을 둔 것이다. 사례연구에서는 장기 회피발전비용 계산에 필요한 확률적인 운전비 시뮬레이션과 전원개발계획 최적화를 위하여 WASP-Ⅱ 전산모형을 이용하였다. 또한, 효율개선을 통해 최대전력을 감소시킬 수 이는 특정 DSM 대안을 선정하고 우리나라 '95 장기전력수급계획안에 기초하여 회피발전비용을 계산하였다. 시산 결과 DSM 자원에 대한 단위전력량당 회피발전비용은 1995년 불변가격 기준으로 31.3[원/kWh]이며, 이 가운데 회피발전고정비용은 15.0[원/kWh]이고 회피발전변동비용은 16.3[원/kWh]으로 나타났다.

This paper discusses definition, concepts, approach methods, application areas, and evaluation of avoided generation costs based on the Korea's official long-term generation expansion plan. The main objective to evaluate avoided costs of resources is to supply decision makers with the breakeven costs of the resources. For the evaluation of avoided costs based on the Korea's generation system, we consider a DSM option which has 1,000MW peak savings, load factor with 70 percents, and life-time with 25 years. The DSM resource can save the fuel spending and capacity additions of a electric utility during its life time. The capacity and fuel savings are evaluated from two different cashflows with and without the DSM option, which are supplied with on the basis of the generation system optimization model (WASP-II), independently. The breakeven kWh costs of the DSM option is projected to be 31.3 [won/kWh], which is composed of generation capacity and fuel avoided costs with 15.0[won/kWh] and 16.3[won/kWh], respectively.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. '95 장기전력수급계획 통상산업부
  2. 전기요금안내 한국전력공사
  3. WASP 모형의 개선에 관한 연구 한국전력공사 기술연구원
  4. MOST 모형 확장에 의한 IRP 응용방안 연구 한국전력공사 전력경제처
  5. The Marginal Cost and Pricing of Electricity (An Applied Approach) C. J. Cicchetti;W. J. Gillen;P. Smolensk
  6. Power Systems Engineering Dept., GE Industrial & Power Systems Guide for Evaluation og Distribution Trans-formers A. M. Bozarth;D. A. Duckett;W. J. Ros
  7. Tellus Institute Costing Energy Resource Options: An Avoided Cost Handbook for Electric Utilities Tellus Institute
  8. Reliability and Rates Electric Energy Generation : Economics J. Vardi;B. Avi-Itzhak
  9. IEEE. Trans. on Eng. Manage v.40 no.2 Multicriteria generation Expansion Planning with Global Environmental Considerations Y. C. Kim;B. H. Ahn
  10. Electric Power System Research v.201 no.216 Costs Avoided by the Use of Wind Energy in the Netherlans A. J. M. van Wijk;W. C. Turkenburg
  11. Energy Policy Avoided Cost Contracts can Undermine Least-Cost Planning S. Berniw;B. Biewald;D. Marron
  12. IEEE Trans. on Power Systems Avoided Coat Adjustments for Nongenerating Utilities T. A. Foreman
  13. Energy Systems and Policy v.11 PURAP 210 Avoided Coat Rates: Economic nd Implemetation Issues M. D. Devine (et al.)
  14. IEEE Trans. on Power Systems v.8 no.3 An Effient Load Model for Analyzing Demand Side Manage-ment Impacts S, Rahman;Rinaldy
  15. IEEE Intermational Conference on ESDDSM Long-Term Generation Expansion Dtrategies for the Reduction of CO₂Emissions in Korea Y. M. Park;J. B. Park