DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Inelastic response of code-designed eccentric structures subject to bi-directional loading

  • Chandler, A.M. (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University College London) ;
  • Correnza, J.C. (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of Melbourne) ;
  • Hutchinson, G.L. (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of Melbourne)
  • Published : 1997.01.25

Abstract

The influence of bi-directional earthquake-induced loading on eccentric (plan-asymmetric) building systems has been investigated. In the first part of the study, comparisons have been made with equivalent results from uni-directional studies. The results are important in developing analytical models appropriate to the formulation of design recommendations. It is concluded that for valid comparisons, both perpendicular horizontal earthquake components must be considered when using models with transversely-orientated elements. In the second part of the study, an assessment has been made of a simplified, unidirectional (lateral) design approach. For stiffness-eccentric systems, the latter approach gives accurate and reasonably conservative estimates of the critical flexible-edge deformation, but may under estimate the stiff-edge element ductility demand by a factor of two in the short-period range.

Keywords

References

  1. Associate Committee on the National Building Code (1995), National Building Code of Canada, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.
  2. Chandler, A.M., Correnza, J.C. and Hutchinson, G.L. (1994), "Period-dependent effects in seismic torsional response of code systems", J. Struct. Eng. ASCE, 120(12), 3418-3434. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:12(3418)
  3. Chopra, A.K. and Goel, R.K. (1991), "Evaluation of torsional provisions in seismic codes", J. Struct. Eng. ASCE, 117, 3762-3782. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1991)117:12(3762)
  4. Correnza, J.C. (1994), Inelastic Dynamic Response of Asymmetric Structures Subject to Uni and Bi Directional Seismic Ground Motions, The Univerisy of Melbourne, Australia.
  5. Correnza, J.C., Hutchinson, G.L. and Chandler, A.M. (1994), "Effect of transverse load-resisting elements on inelastic earthquake response of eccentric-plan buildings", Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 23, 75-89. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290230107
  6. De La Llera, J.C. and Chopra, A.K. (1994), "Accidental torsion in buildings due to stiffness uncertainty", Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 23, 117-136. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290230202
  7. European Committee for Standardisation (1994), Eurocode EC8: Structures in seismic regions; Part 1, General design and building, National Standards Institutions.
  8. Goel, R.K. and Chopra, A.K. (1994), "Dual-level approach for seismic design of asymmetric-plan buildings", J. Struct. Eng. ASCE, 120(1), 161-179. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:1(161)
  9. International Conference of Building Officials (1991), Uniform Building Code 1991 Edition, International Conference of Building Officials, Whittier, California.
  10. Mohraz, B. and Elghadamsi, F.E. (1989), "Earthquake ground motion and response spectra", Chapter 2, The Seismic Design Handbook, ed F. Naiem, pp. 32-80, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
  11. Tso, W.K. and Zhu, T.J. (1992), "Design of torsionally unbalanced structural systems based on code provisons I: ductility demand", Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 21, 609-627. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290210704
  12. Wong, C.M. and Tso, W.K. (1994), "Inelastic seismic response of torsionally unbalanced systems designed using elastic dynamic analysis", Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 23, 777-798. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290230707

Cited by

  1. Pseudodynamic response of torsionally unbalanced two-storey test structure vol.36, pp.8, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.672
  2. Role of accidental torsion in seismic reliability assessment for steel buildings vol.9, pp.5, 2009, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2009.9.5.457