A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHIC CEPHALOMETRY AND CONVENTIONAL CEPHALOMETRY IN RELIABILITY OF HEAD FILM MEASUREMENTS (LANDMARKS IDENTIFICATION)

일반 측방 두부규격 방사선사진과 측방 추부규격 전산화 방사선사진에서의 계측점의 신뢰도에 대한 비교 연구

  • Kim Hyung-Don (Department of Dental Radiology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim Kee-Deog (Department of Dental Radiology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Park Chang-Seo (Department of Dental Radiology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
  • 김형돈 (연세대학교치과대학 구강악안면방사선학 교실) ;
  • 김기덕 (연세대학교치과대학 구강악안면방사선학 교실) ;
  • 박창성 (연세대학교치과대학 구강악안면방사선학 교실)
  • Published : 1997.02.01

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare & to find out the variability of head film measurements (and marks identification) between Fuji computed radiographic cephalometry and conventional cephalometry. 28 Korean adults were selected. Lateral cephalometric FCR film and conventional cephalometric film of each subject was taken. Four investigators identified 24 cephalometric landmarks on lateral cephalometric FCR film and conventional cephalometric film. The comparable measurements between lateral cephalometric FCR film and conventional cephalometric film were statistically analysed. The results were as follows : 1. In FCR film & conventional film, coefficient of variation (C.V.) of 24 landmarks was taken horizonta1ly & vertically. There is no significant difference of rank order of landmarks in C.V. between two films. 2. In comparison of significant differences of landmarks variability between FCR film & conventional film, horizontal value of coefficient of variation, showed significant differences in four landmarks among twenty-four landmarks, but vertical value of coefficient of variation showed significant differences in sixteen landmarks among twenty-four landmarks. FCR film showed significantly less variability than conventional film in 17 subjects among 20(4+16) subjects that showed significant difference.

Keywords