Quality Improvement Activity in Hospitals and Its Acceptance among Hospital Personnels

의료 질 관리 활동에 대한 병원종사자들의 태도와 인식

  • Hwang, Jeong-Hae (QA Office, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Cho, Sung-Hyun (QA Office, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Chang-Yup (Dept. of Health Policy and Management, College of Medicine, Seoul National University) ;
  • Seo, Juag-Don (Dept. of Internal Medicine, Samsung Medical Center) ;
  • Han, Man-Chung (Dept. of Diagnostic Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Jeong-Ye (The Korean Society of Quality Assurance in Health Care)
  • 황정해 (서울대학교병원 QA전담반) ;
  • 조성현 (서울대학교병원 QA전담반) ;
  • 김창엽 (서울대학교 의과대학 의료관리학교실) ;
  • 서정돈 (삼성의료원 내과) ;
  • 한만청 (서울대학교 의과대학 진단방사선과학교실) ;
  • 이정예 (한국의료QA학회)
  • Published : 1997.03.21

Abstract

Background : It is a primary goal for hospital personnel to improve the quality of patient care. In Korea the concept of quality assurance has been spread over the last five years. Many hospitals have implemented quality assurance programs that fit their own philosophy and needs. As a result, they are supposed to have different experiences and attitudes toward quality assurance. To investigate their diversity will be helpful to have a direction to the future and to enhance the quality assurance activities in Korean hospitals. Objectives : The aim of this study is to obtain information about hospital personnel's attitude and opinion toward quality assurance in hospitals. Methods : A questionnaire was developed which consisted of five parts; the general characteristics of respondent, the concepts of quality assurance, need for quality assurance program, current status of quality improvement activities, and participation in programs. Using the registry of Korean hospitals, 102 hospitals with more than 400 beds were selected. Questionnaires were mailed to hospital staffs of each hospital; top managers, clinical department heads, registered nurses, medical recorders, and administrators. Results : Of 2038 questionnaires sent, 877 were returned, giving response rate of 44%. Most respondents(70%) regarded quality assurance as efforts to provide patient with care in highest quality and to improve effectiveness or resource utilization. Ninety-nine percent of respondents agreed to need for quality assurance in their hospitals. There were current quality improvement programs implemented in the department of 553 respondents(62%), and most of the(85%) have participated in at least one program. Lack of motivation was pointed out as a barrier to implement the programs. Conclusion : Although most respondents have known of the concept and need for quality assurance, this study suggests that education and motivation of hospital personnel be needed to activate the quality assurance programs in hospitals.

Keywords