Variation of Crop Coefficient With Respect to the Reference Crop Evapotranspiration Estimation Methods in Ponded Direct Seeding Paddy Rice

담수직파재배 논벼의 기준작물 잠재증발산량 산정방법별 작물계수의 변화

  • Published : 1997.08.01

Abstract

In order to provide basic information for the estimation of evapotranspiration in the ponded direct seeding paddy field, both field lysimeter experiment and model prediction were performed to estimate daily ET. Various methods were used to predict daily reference crop ET and crop coefficients. Measure4 mean daily ET during the 1995 growing season varied from 5.9 to 6.1 mm depending on the species, while it varied from 5.1 to 5.5 mm in 1996. Model predicted mean daily ET during the 1995 growing season varied from 3.9 to 4.9 mm depending on the prediction model, while it varied from 3.5 to 4.7 mm in 1996. The smaller ET values both measured and predicted in 1996 were caused by the low values of temperature, sunshine hours, and solar radiation. Crop coefficients varied from 1.20 to 1.50 in 1995 depending on the prediction model, while it varied from 1.10 to 1.47 in 1996. Comparison of the seven reference crop ET prediction methods used in this study shows that the Penman-Monteith method and the FAO-Radiation method gave the lowest ET while the corrected Penman method and the Hargreaves method gave the largest ET. Since crop coefficients vary to a large extent based on the prediction methods, reference crop ET prediction method should be carefully selected in irrigation planning.

Keywords

References

  1. 농지개량 no.통권134 벼의 직파재배와 물관리대책 강인식
  2. 영농방식 변화에 따른 필요수량 변화연구(II) 농림부;농어촌진흥공사
  3. 영농방식 변화에 따른 필요수량 변화연구(I) 농림부;농어촌진흥공사
  4. 소비수량산정방법 실용화 연구 농업진흥공사
  5. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering v.112 no.4 A Penman for all seasons Allen,R.G.
  6. Agronomy Journal v.81 Operational estimates of reference evapotranspiration Allen,R.G.;Jensen,M.E.;Wright,J.L.;Burman,R.D.
  7. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering v.117 no.5 FAO-24 reference evapotranspiration factors Allen,R.G.;Pruitt,W.O.
  8. ICID Bulletin v.4 no.2 An update for the definition of reference evapotranspiration Allen,R.G.;Smith,M.;Perrier,A.;Pereira,L.S.
  9. ICID Bulletin v.4 no.2 An update for the calculation of reference evapotranspiration Allen,R.G.;Smith,M.;Pereira,L.S.;Perrier,A.
  10. Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 24 Guidelines for predicting crop water requirement Doorenbos,J.;Pruitt,W.O.
  11. ASCE Manual No. 70 Evapotranspiration and Irrigation water requirments Jensen,M.E.;Burman,R.D.;Allen,R.G.
  12. Transactions of the ASAE v.34 no.5 Prospect of large-sized paddy field using direct seeding supported by subsurface irrigation system Murugaboopathi,C.;Tomita,M.;Yamaji,E.;Koide,S.
  13. REF-ET : Reference evapotranspiration calcultion software Utah State University
  14. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Division, ASCE v.108 New evapotranspiration crop coefficients Wright,J.L.
  15. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, ASCE v.111 Agricultural benefits for Senegal river basin Haragreaves,G.L.;Haragreaves,G.H.;Riely,J.P.
  16. Applied Engineering in Agriculture v.1 no.2 Reference crop evapotranspiration from temperature Haragreaves,G.H.;Samani,Z.A.
  17. Tech. Comm. Commonwealth Bureau of Soils no.53 Vegetation and hydrology Perman,H.L.
  18. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Division, ASCE v.108 no.IR2 New evapotranspiration crop coefficients Wright,J.L.
  19. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Division, ASCE v.96 no.1 Peak water requirements of crops in Southern Idaho Wright,J.L.;Jensen,M.E.