DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Field-induced refractive index variations in GaAs/AlGaAs multiple quantum well waveguide modulator

  • Cho, Wook-Rae (Department of Physics, Yonsei University) ;
  • Park, Seung-Han (Department of Physics, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim, Ung (Department of Physics, Yonsei University) ;
  • Park, Kyung-Hyun (Division of Electronics and Information Technology, Korea Institute of Science and Technology)
  • Received : 1997.01.20
  • Published : 1997.03.01

Abstract

A quantum well electroabsorption waveguide modulator utilizing a field-induced refractive index change was designed and fabricated. The on/off ratios of the device were investigated as a function of wavelength over the spectral range of 850 nm to 910 nm for the various reverse biases. The field-induced refractive index variations associated with quantum-confined Stark effect was theoretically obtained based on the measured on/off ratios. The resulting maximum refractive index change(${\DELTA}n) of ~7.5 {\times} 10^{-4}$ at -8 V was estimated.

Keywords

References

  1. T. H. Wood, A. Burrus, D. A. B. Miller, D. S. Chemla, T. C. Damen, A. C. Gossard, and W. Wiegann, Appl. Phys. Lett. 44, 16 (1984) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.94586
  2. S. Tarucha and H. Okamoto, Appl. Phvs. Lett. 48, 13 (1986) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.96776
  3. D. A. B. Miller, J. S. Weiner, and D. S. Chemla, IEEE J. Quanum Electron. QE-22, 1816 (1986) https://doi.org/10.1109/JQE.1986.1073167
  4. D. A. B.Miller, D. S. Chemla, T. C. Damen, A. C. Gos-sard, W. Wiegmann, T. H. Wood, and C. A, Burrus, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 2173 (1984) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.2173
  5. D. A. B.Miller, D. S. Chemla, T. C. Damen, A. C. Gos-sard, W. Wiegmann, T. H. Wood, and C. A, Burrus, Phys. Rev. B. 32, 1043 (1985) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.32.1043
  6. J. S. Weiner, D. A. B. Miller, and D. S. Chemla, Appl. Phys. Lett. 50, 842 (1987) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.98008
  7. S. Adachi, J. Appl. Phys. 58, R1 (1985) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.336070
  8. J. P. van der Zeil and A. C. Gossard, J. Appl. Phys. 49, 2919 (1978) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.325178
  9. M. Warren, W. Gibbons, K. Komatsu, D. Hendricks, H. M. Gibbs, and M. Sugimoto, Appl. Phys. Lett. 51, 19 (1987) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.99002
  10. T. C.Huang, Y. Chung, N. Dagli, and L. A. Coldren, Appl. Phys. Lett. 57, 114 (1990) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.103959
  11. M. Glick, F. K. Reinhart, G. Weimann, and W. Schlapp, Appl. Phys. Lett. 48, 14 (1986) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.96633
  12. T. H. Wood, R. W. Tkach, and A. R. Chraplyvy, Appl. Phys. Lett. 50, 798 (1987) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.98048
  13. R. W. Wickman, A. L. Moretti, K. A. Stair, and T. E. Bird, Appl. Phys. Lett. 58, 690 (1991) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.104545