OCCLUSION AND VERTICAL DIMENSION CHANGES ACCORDING TO DENTURE PROCESSING TECHNIQUES

총의치 온성방법에 따른 교합 및 수직 고경의 변화

  • Kim, Mun-Young (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Chung, Kwan-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Yu, Hyoung-Woo (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Ahn, Seung-Geun (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Song, Kwang-Yeob (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Park, Charn-Woon (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University)
  • 김문영 (전북대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 정관호 (전북대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 유형우 (전북대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 안승근 (전북대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 송광엽 (전북대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 박찬운 (전북대학교 치과대학 보철학교실)
  • Published : 1996.11.01

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the amount of the vertical pin opening of dentures processed by the conventional compression method & the injection-processing method. The articulating ribbon and T-Scan system were used to determine the changes in tooth contacts and the correlation between the changes in tooth contacts and the amount of the vertical pin opening after processing was analyzed statistically. The obtained results were as follows. 1. The amounts of the vertical pin opening were 0.75mm, 0.31mm for conventional compression method and injection-pressing method, respectively. The difference between the two methods was highly significant on the basis of t test statistics(p<0.05). 2. The total number of contact points recorded by articulating ribbon after processing was decreased to 48%, 72%, of that before processing for conventional compression method and injection-pressing method, by T-Scan system, 39%, 53%, respectively. 3. The mean values for the number of contacts points per tooth recorded by articulating ribbon after processing were 1.6 for the second molar, 2.2 for the first moalr, 0.4 for the second premolar, 0.6 for the first premolar in conventional compression method, and 2, 3.2, 1.2, 0.8 in injection-pressing method. 4. The correlation between the reduction of contact points and the amount of the pin opening after processing was not significant. 5. The mean values for the number of contact points per tooth recorded by T-Scan system after processing were 1.25, 1.4, 0.7, and 0.55 at the second molar, the first molar, the second premolar, and the first premolar in conventional compression method, and 1.45, 2.1, 1.0, 0.75 in injection method, respectively. 6. The correlation between the number of contact points by using articulating ribbon and T-Scan system after processing was not significant in both methods.

Keywords