A STUDY ON THE TENSILE BOND STRENGTH TO TOOTH STRUCTURE OF TOOTH COLORED MATERIALS ACCORDING TO FILLING METHODS AND LIGHT CURING UNITS

심미수복재의 수복방법과 광조사기기에 따른 치질과의 인장결합강도에 관한 연구

  • Hwang, Ho-Keel (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Kim, Young-Kwan (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Oh, Haeng-Jin (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University)
  • 황호길 (조선대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 김영관 (조선대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 오행진 (조선대학교 치과대학 보존학교실)
  • Published : 1996.10.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the tensile bond strength to tooth structure of composite resin and glass ionomer cement according to filling methods and light curing units. In this study, two class V cavities were prepared on the buccal surface of each tooth of 140 extracted human molars, and they were randomly assigned into 3 experimental groups with 40 teeth and control group with 20 teeth. And then, each experimental groups subdivided into 2 groups(A,B) according to light curing units. The cavities of each group were filled with the CLEARFIL FII self curing resin(Control Group), Z-100 light curing resin(Group 1), Vitremer$^{TM}$ light curing glass ionomer cement(Group 2) and Z-100 light curing resin over the Vitrebond$^{TM}$ liner(Group 3). And subdivided A Group used Argon Laser(SPECTRUM$^{TM}$, U.S.A.), B Group used XL 1,000 curing light (3M, U.S.A.). The specimens underwent temperature changed from $5^{\circ}C$ to $55^{\circ}C$ five hundred times. After thermocycling, specimens were stored in 100% relative humidity at $37^{\circ}C$ for 24 hours. And then, the tensile bond strength of specimens were calculated with Universal Testing Machine(AGS-100A, Japan). The results were as follows : 1. Among the experimental groups, the group 2-B showed the highest tensile bond strength ($18.89{\pm}7.80$) and the group 1-A showed the lowest tensile bond strength ($11.68{\pm}2.28$). There was significant difference between group 2-B and group 1-A(p<0.01). 2. Between the light curing units, the XL 1,000 unit showed higher tensile bond strength ($16.63{\pm}3.20$) than that of the Argon Laser unit ($13.73{\pm}2.30$). There was significant difference between XL 1,000 and Argon Laser(p<0.01). 3. About filling methods and materials, the group 2 showed the highest tensile bond strength ($17.56{\pm}1.89$) and the group 1 showed the lowest tensile bond strength($13.03{\pm}1.90$). There was significant difference between group 2 and group 1,3(p<0.01). In conclusion, the results showed that the glass-ionomer cement that cured by XL 1,000 light curing unit demonstrated significantly higher tensile bond strength than other curing unit and filling methods.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 조선대학교